GetOnTop:
Value_added:
CFA is mostly fundamental analysis, though they cover a few very basic technical analysis concepts.

This. It's more like, "if a lot of people are practicing this witchcraft then it could move markets at times, so you should at least be aware of it".

Exactly, great way to phrase it. But I wouldn't trust somebody to manage money just with a CFA. I know people who have the designation, yet are terrible investors...and a ton of people who are great investors without the CFA.

 

you actually managed to collect 69 points on wallstreet oasis without knowing the answer to this!!!@ ur the dude!!!

"A man travels the world over in search of what he needs and returns home to find it." ~George Moore
 

Obviously fundamental analysis.

Lol @ ppl discounting TA. Like it or not but any decision based off historical data qualifies as TA including spreads, asset correlations, calculating historical VAR (delta version), seasonality spreads, a ton of econometric tools, etc. Of course you also have simple relative strength and momentum tools as well as esoteric oscillators. Nevertheless TA provides a number of valid indicators to describe the market environment. And a lot of those indicators are leaders as opposed to fundamental analysis which is almost entirely lagging. Price action > fundamental analysis

 

you have an interesting view of "TA". to me it's a bunch of idiots who don't understand how markets work stupidly looking for repetition in time frames that are too short for such expectations (aka gambler's fallacy). i personally put a lot of weight in the schiller 10 year trailing P/E and other long term factors - never would have considered that tats and iss however

 
Spalding Get Your Foot Off the Boat:
you have an interesting view of "TA". to me it's a bunch of idiots who don't understand how markets work stupidly looking for repetition in time frames that are too short for such expectations (aka gambler's fallacy). i personally put a lot of weight in the schiller 10 year trailing P/E and other long term factors - never would have considered that tats and iss however

P/E is a fundamental ratio. The price of the asset, however, is a TA trait. Pairs trading, convergence trades, etc. are largely based off price behavior, aka technicals. TA is more than stupid moving averages and other esoteric signals. If you use historical prices to make decisions then you're using TA.

 

using historical prices in the absence of other info seems pretty stupid to me... are you saying that a TA analyst would like a stock based on it's "positive" price movement regardless of a "negative" earnings / sales / assets / liabilities outlook?

trying to use positive and negative carefully here, acknowledging that positive for a momentum trader is different than for a value investor

 
Best Response
Spalding Get Your Foot Off the Boat:
using historical prices in the absence of other info seems pretty stupid to me... are you saying that a TA analyst would like a stock based on it's "positive" price movement regardless of a "negative" earnings / sales / assets / liabilities outlook?

trying to use positive and negative carefully here, acknowledging that positive for a momentum trader is different than for a value investor

If you read Market Wizards you'll see that a lot of top traders use a combination of fundamentals and technicals. Also depends what kind of assets you're investing/trading in as well as the time frame. Most forms of arbitrage (rel value), aside perhaps risk arb, is based more off technicals (historical prices) combined with fundamentals to ensure that the cash flow payoffs expectations are similar/exact.

But yea, for value investing TA is not that relevant. Nevertheless I bet even value investors scan charts for "better" entry points or to see where the stock has come from... or at least the flow traders that fight the VWAP that make the executions do.

 

Minima iure unde libero quo ex delectus quia. Nihil impedit repellat perferendis. Voluptatem amet error unde quo debitis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”