Hi,
Can anyone tell me what the key factors are when looking to value an oil or gas company? What are the industry specific factors influencing the an oil or gas stock? What metrics would I use to value a specific oil and gas stock?
Any help would be most appreciated!
Thanks in advance.
| +81 | Q&A - Buyside Equity Research Analyst/PM | 29 | 1w | |
| +32 | How the heck do you learn all of this stuff? | 10 | 2d | |
| +28 | My experience on the sell side | 20 | 2w | |
| +24 | Clues in Financial Reporting Analysis | 7 | 3d | |
| +17 | Am i fairly compensated? | 9 | 4d | |
| +14 | Data Science to PM | 8 | 1w | |
| +14 | Heard they don’t model at Oppenheimer | 10 | 2w | |
| +12 | ER - Remote Jobs? | 8 | 1w | |
| Equity Research at Bank vs IG, High Yield & Leveraged Loans Research at Asset Manager | 4 | 2d | ||
| +11 | Who uses sell-side Strategists? Are they valuable? | 4 | 1w |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Are you talking about E&P / upstream, midstream or downstream? Makes a big difference.
guessing he's going to say e&p or asset (e.g. shale gas play)
short answer is a NAV model. essentially a dcf where your revs are driven by the price of (gas) and the production. On top of the fact that opinions on future gas prices can vary greatly depending on the source (wood mac, cera, etc), there are a ton of other factors (where are you selling geographically...henry hub +- a basis differential, well costs, number wells, spacing, acreage, million tax issues, royalties), but nav is the easy answer.
What is a NAV model?
hi - either upstream or downstream, i'm interested in either. thanks for your help so far!
also - possibly to make things simpler, how is valuing an oil and gas company different to valuing a company in another industry?
thanks.
Upstream and downstream are quite different businesses... but either way assets are the key factor in energy. Basically an NAV model will value the assets today, assuming no future acq or development. Again assets, whether they be proven reserves or pipelines are what produce revenue, not market position or brand name like in other businesses, remember energy is a commodity
I don't know much, but I can give you a high level on why O&G companies are diff. First of all, they are very asset centric, so the value is derived off the assets they have on the b/s rather than primarily looking at revenue or other similar metrics. You wouldn't use a DCF because E&P companies are very CAPEX intensive so they would have very low FCF leading to a low valuation. You also have to account for the fact that oil is a depleting asset so you cannot assume a well will last forever and there will always be an asset retirement obligation, etc. Also, companies cannot control O&G prices the same way a normal retailer can control the price of the items they sell. The price of O&G is determined by the market and you have to account for fluctuations in price.
Note: I do not work in an oil and gas group, but interviewed with one and did some homework so any of the more experienced O&G bankers feel free to chime in and correct me if I'm wrong on anything. I also have a few primers that some members on this site have sent to me and I would be happy to forward them your way if you want, just send me a PM.
Very good answer. Sent you a PM, would love to get a look at those primers.
And yes upstream and downstream are VERY diff, a downstream company would be valued much more like a "normal" company.
I personally did not receive too many o&g specific questions in my interviews but the guide was very helpful nonetheless. One difference short left out is the accounting differences (FC v. SE), but otherwise that is correct.
Hi,
Thanks for the great answers everyone.
What are the specific accounting differences when analyzing an oil and gas company when compared with a normal company?
To give you some background I'm asking all of this because I'm interviewing for an equity research role which is entry level. I don't have an educational background in finance and my work experience has been in hedge fund sales, however it was an oil and gas hedge fund so I want to have all my bases covered.
Thanks everyone.
The diff is successful efforts and full cost and they differ on how they account for exploration expense (capitalize or expense).
Reiciendis molestiae sed sunt officiis sint. Modi consequuntur at cumque magni. Nostrum nesciunt et est nulla. Facilis dolor sunt maxime quisquam dolore.
Doloremque ratione ipsam non voluptatibus voluptas voluptas aut maiores. Necessitatibus et vel aperiam ut est tenetur qui. Officia aliquid tempore esse quia quaerat nobis id tempora. Voluptatem adipisci iusto laudantium beatae. Et sint nam aperiam non vitae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...