Stock deal - Deferred Tax Liability
My understanding is that a DTL is created when cash taxes higher book D&A which leads cash taxes > book taxes
Why then is a DTL created in a stock deal?
Where am I going wrong?
My understanding is that a DTL is created when cash taxes higher book D&A which leads cash taxes > book taxes
Why then is a DTL created in a stock deal?
Where am I going wrong?
+253 | My folks just don’t get it | 49 | 13h | |
+176 | Dating a Nontarget is Paradise | 23 | 1h | |
+57 | Effort level | 6 | 55m | |
+45 | How's Greenhill doing? | 58 | 3h | |
+39 | Was I in the wrong here? | 18 | 1d | |
+34 | Working as an investment banking M&A anal-yst at a sweatshop is paradise | 9 | 3s | |
+31 | What’s going on with RBC Real estate ?? | 18 | 1d | |
+31 | How's DB looking in 2024/25? | 21 | 4h | |
+26 | Prep for FT recruiting class of 2025 | 2 | 18h | |
+25 | Unbiased EB Rankings | 5 | 5d |
Career Resources
Take a step back and think about pretax income first; after a merger, there have been write-ups, then book value > tax value, which leads to higher D&A, like you said. Therefore, pretax book income will be lower than pretax tax income, which means that on your books, you'll recognize a lower dollar amount of taxes than you actually pay to the IRS. Thus, we create a DTL to bridge the gap between financial and tax accounting. Basically, the DTL recognizes what the acquirer must eventually pay the IRS in excess of the lower taxes it will report on its income statement for accounting purposes.
Basically, your first statement is wrong ("My understanding is that a DTL is created when cash taxes balance sheet will not balance unless you also decrease the DTL account by the difference between cash paid out and book tax expense.
Hope this helps.
Separate from the D&A you're talking about, the DTL is based on the fact that there is a fair market value on the books that shareholders/corp will eventually have to pay taxes on.
So say the tax basis for the company was $100mm and it is bought for $300mm in a tax free stock deal. Tax basis remains at $100mm, but FMV (what is recorded on books) is $300mm. You have a "realized gain" of $200mm, but have not yet "recognized" the gain. So the deferred tax liability is related to the deferral of taxes on the $200mm gain that has not been "recognized". Calculated as the gain x the buyer's tax rate. Eventually the taxes are paid once gains are recognized
Sorry to bring up an old post, but I am a bit confused. In the second part - I don't understand the concept of how the DTL is related to the deferral of taxes on the $200mm gain that has not been "recognized".
Does the corp have to create additional DTL for writing up assets in an acquisition (does the acquirer incur a gain on a tax basis when it writes up an asset in an M&A deal)? When does the corp eventually "recognize" the gain on a book basis?
I thought a DTL entry on the B/S is created solely for the anticipation that the corp will have future cash payments for taxes owed on a cash basis, excess of what is recorded on a book basis due to increased D&A.
When the assets are eventually sold, the gain recognized for books will be, in this case, 200MM less than the gain recognized for tax, because your tax basis has not been written up, but your book basis has (obviously in a taxable or an (h)(10) acquisition, the DTL will not be present). Remember, deferred taxes are about matching the timing of tax recognition for financial statements items to those items in the financial statements. thus, when you have the gain down the road, you would owe 70MM (give or take - 200*.35) more than the amount of the gain for book purposes times the effective tax rate.
somebody help me dammit
Deferred Tax Liability Accounting (Originally Posted: 11/16/2011)
I am selling a company in a STOCK transaction and my client (TARGET) has a deferred tax liability. Most of this is due to goodwill from a previous acquisition. My question is what is the true economic cost to a potential acquiror of TARGET?
http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=deferred+tax+liability
Investment Tax Credit and Deferred Tax Liability (Originally Posted: 07/13/2013)
I have two financial modeling questions related to energy finance / project financial modeling:
1) US investment tax credit is 30%, which reduces tax liability of the parent company. How is this treated in a project financial model? Is it a reduction in project cost at the outset in the assumptions, or is it a reduction in income taxes over the life of the project?
2) If using MACRS or accelerated depreciation, there will be Deferred Tax Liability. I know this goes into the Balance Sheet, but what is the on the side of the BS to balance the DTL? Where else in the three financial statements would DTL appear?
Thanks in advance, CC
Repellat earum ex sed similique atque. Eos facere earum doloribus tenetur. Nesciunt modi architecto cumque.
Totam nulla vero harum. Aut porro ut corporis necessitatibus in in vel. Officia voluptatibus nostrum aut ipsum et quod harum et. Qui fuga deleniti saepe et nostrum amet qui eum.
Est placeat beatae qui. Laudantium cupiditate consectetur ea voluptate magnam incidunt. Est nulla quidem voluptatem cum reprehenderit aut iusto ut. Maiores tenetur et tempora qui.
Quisquam et quia expedita quisquam sunt. Quae quia aut aut enim. Recusandae possimus soluta illum ut enim perspiciatis et excepturi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...