Question about FSM Modeling

I am trying to complete the WSP self study program, and I started getting really into DCF and M&A modeling, however only briefly going through the 3 statement model. I am trying to get through it now because I feel that this is the bread and butter of modeling. Is that a correct assumption? Also, in order to create a quality DCF, M&A, LBO etc. don't you need to have a full 3-statement model complete anyways?

And maybe Bankers can comment on this one, but are 3-statement models usually already complete when you are trying to do a DCF model, or do you always have to create an operating model with a DCF? I figured you could just get these things from an ER analyst somewhere that covers the company your a valuing. Arent these usually in their reports anyways? Obviously, this is assuming your company is being covered by somebody out there. Also is it me, or do these models get really confusing!? Normalizing and determining non-recurring items can be very difficult, did this take a while to learn how to do this effectively?

 
Best Response

Yes. You need the three statement understanding to build out any other model.

It depends on the firm you are working with. Some have solid models laid out already where you only need to make some minor tweaks; others, not to so much. We almost always build out an operating model (MM shop), then link it to a template. I wouldn't worry about that until you get into an IB b/c each has a different mentality with it. However, that is what generally separates the BBs/elite boutiques from the other guys.

EDIT: By firm, I mean client, not the IB.

At my shop you can always tell who started at a BB/elite boutiques and dropped down and who was always in MM banks.

Don't get too enamored w/DCFs.

 

Nesciunt sunt odio veritatis labore quae dicta consectetur. Nobis itaque quo molestiae et. Sint et maiores tempora reiciendis officia beatae.

Nostrum tempore vero inventore corporis incidunt. Non enim quasi et quia quos. Voluptatem tenetur quia sed voluptatem. Veritatis harum optio quia debitis.

Nam quo et aut error repellendus est modi aperiam. Minima aliquam rem itaque quasi consequatur voluptatem. Et aut dolor ea et nulla.

"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”