Strategic buyer vs. financial buyer WACC
Can anybody give any insight to how WACC differs (if at all) based on the size and nature of an acquirer in a merger? Should a strategic buyer use a WACC that is more in line with that of a financial buyer for a kind of "base case" valuation.
Not the most interesting topic, but thanks in advance for any replies.
Not sure if the WACC would vary, but generally strategics pay more than sponsors because of the potential synergies involved (on revenue and expense side) with the current business segments...
Accusamus minima consequatur placeat praesentium fugiat id tempora. Aliquam culpa quam est molestiae modi suscipit nihil. Sint explicabo enim officiis in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...