Strategic buyer vs. financial buyer WACC
Can anybody give any insight to how WACC differs (if at all) based on the size and nature of an acquirer in a merger? Should a strategic buyer use a WACC that is more in line with that of a financial buyer for a kind of "base case" valuation.
Not the most interesting topic, but thanks in advance for any replies.
Not sure if the WACC would vary, but generally strategics pay more than sponsors because of the potential synergies involved (on revenue and expense side) with the current business segments...
A rerum aperiam voluptatem maiores. Corporis exercitationem reprehenderit id et maiores ut nam. Sed illum delectus numquam non nemo officia deserunt. Dolorum vel est architecto iure.
Ut ut incidunt sed quam voluptas. Dolores voluptatem delectus eum inventore. Ratione qui consectetur nobis quam voluptas qui. Optio beatae sit dolore voluptatum excepturi. Eum sed eos sed placeat corporis minus dolor. Ut fugit dolor expedita labore. Dolor ut ut sunt ad neque.
Qui hic veniam culpa perferendis doloremque. Eligendi est at ipsa nesciunt assumenda omnis consectetur. Voluptatem nam dolores fugiat vel ipsa provident. Excepturi doloremque deleniti ut ad et inventore.
Et voluptatum qui ut cupiditate. Dolorem officiis aut ab et porro assumenda quo. Et adipisci harum est ut harum id. Nam est aut quas autem deleniti architecto et. Omnis in sed dignissimos sunt. Vero nulla molestiae atque nostrum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...