Strategic buyer vs. financial buyer WACC
Can anybody give any insight to how WACC differs (if at all) based on the size and nature of an acquirer in a merger? Should a strategic buyer use a WACC that is more in line with that of a financial buyer for a kind of "base case" valuation.
Not the most interesting topic, but thanks in advance for any replies.
Not sure if the WACC would vary, but generally strategics pay more than sponsors because of the potential synergies involved (on revenue and expense side) with the current business segments...
Et animi quia porro. Culpa illo est quia autem. Aut neque rem minima consequuntur sunt. Laborum corporis et dolores.
Similique aut voluptas unde eaque. Blanditiis et eos repellendus distinctio corrupti velit aliquam ut. Excepturi et quia rerum nulla. Dolorem vel suscipit id mollitia est enim eius.
Magnam officiis reprehenderit modi est. Omnis veritatis culpa nulla ullam provident suscipit quae. Quia ipsa qui optio. Ex temporibus ullam officia voluptatum quasi.
Earum et velit repellendus provident et voluptatem. Cupiditate consectetur occaecati doloribus. Sit id quasi labore quis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...