Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not

If you're an M&A banker at UBS in America this summer, you might not want to spend too much money on your vacation. Things don't appear to be going entirely well for you. As we observed in June, UBS ranked somewhere below 20th position for US M&A deals in the first half of this year. Its US M&A market share was very far below 2% of the total.

If you're an M&A banker at UBS in Asia, on the other hand, a frugal vacation is less of a necessity. UBS ranked 2nd for M&A revenues in Asia ex-Japan in the first half of 2026 according to Dealogic, and accounted for over 7% of the available fees in the region. Comparatively speaking, the Asian M&A business at UBS is thriving. 

What's the cause of the discrepancy? UBS didn't comment for this article, but speaking during last week's investor call, CFO Todd Tuckner suggested the bank had failed to participate in this year's "very large transactions where participation is often influenced by broader client financing relationships." By comparison, said Tuckner, the bank is seeing "good momentum" in the "mid-to-large cap" segment. This seems to particularly be the case in the US market. 

Unfortunately, US mega deals are where this year's mega growth is. Dealogic says US M&A revenues were up 35% in the first half of this year, to $15bn. Major M&A deals such as Paramount's $110bn acquisition of Warner Bros Discovery have driven the big US fee surge. Although UBS is a joint bookrunner on the debt syndication financing for this deal, it is not an M&A advisor. Nor is it advising on any of the other six mega deals as defined by law firm White & Case. 

In Asia, by comparison, UBS was an advisor on many marquee deals in the first half, including, for example, the $31.2bn merger between Guotai Junan Securities and Haitong Securities, and the $14.7bn merger between Taishin and Shin Kong financial holding companies in Taiwan.

It's unfortunate, then, that Asian M&A revenues were down 15% to $854m. Because UBS missed out on the US windfall, its global M&A revenues fell 4% year-on-year in the second quarter and were up only 2% in the first half. By comparison, global M&A revenues at the more US focused Morgan Stanley and Barclays were up 66% year-on-year in the six months to June.

UBS's persistent poor showing in America is despite the bank doubling the size of its US dealmaking team to 200 people since acquiring Credit Suisse in 2023 and despite hiring 17 M&A bankers in America in 2025. Marco Valla, global head of the investment bank, informed Financial News last December that the Swiss bank was "well-positioned to significantly grow," particularly in the US market. That hasn't happened yet. Tuckner's comments suggest this might be because UBS is less willing to finance the most mega US deals than its rivals. 

In Asia, UBS has also added bankers. Speaking to Financial News earlier this month, heads of UBS's Asian investment banking business - Gaetano Bassolino and Greg Peirce - said the bank added 100 Asian dealmakers when it acquired Credit Suisse and that this had worked out well because the bank had thus widened its focus. Pre-Credit Suisse, UBS's Asian business was focused on equity capital markets (ECM), said Bassolino and Pierce. The 100 new Credit Suisse bankers enabled it to 'broaden' "across South-east Asia and South Korea as well and into [M&A] advisory."  

In Asia, therefore, UBS's 100 new bankers have broken new ground. In the US, all the new bankers are ploughing the same terrain that their predecessors had failed to fully cultivate. This is more complicated. It also entails the politically sensitive task of reallocating existing relationships. 

UBS certainly hasn't given up on the US market. Valla wants UBS to rank sixth for investment banking globally, versus its current position somewhere far outside the top 10. He will need to crack the US M&A market to achieve this and Valla has accordingly indicated that he intends to hire another 25 dealmakers in America this year. Good luck to him. Existing US M&A MDs at UBS seem unlikely to get the best bonuses in the meantime. 

18 Comments
 

They probably need to 3x-4x output/productivity in the Americas to get to #6, I.e. not going to get there

 

They are so bad in the Americas that they made many of their Americas group heads into global group heads so they wouldn’t have to speak to Americas results and could take credit for EMEA and APAC deals

 
Most Helpful

UBS is a WM bank with an IB bolted on to serve their wealth management clients. They dominate WM in APAC and Europe, but have a relatively weaker US platform. That's why they crush it internationally but struggle stateside. You'll see UBS on a lot of ECM syndicates because of their access to APAC family offices and HNW individuals. A lot of PE firms, including mine, slot them in as bookrunners on ECM deals solely for their WM reach. Also helps that our partners use UBS WM and they provide fairly aggressive financing terms.

 

I agree with you, but i would say that i've worked with a few UBS people (inc. group heads) and they said the access of wealth management clients for IPO bookbuilding was waay overblown, but something every client loved and fell for. I'm still of the unpopular view that UBS' European ECM franchise is still solid - barely more than a select few European heritage banks can crack the US market, the sooner the likes of DB, UBS, Santander and the Frenchies realise this and focus on Europe-wide, the better for everyone. 

 

Nothing to do with Switzerland (or even WM). UBS is strong in Asia because it inherited SG Warburg’s Asia business which was top notch. Post GFC when they committed hara kiri in the US and lost what was a phenomenal pool of talent, they were still killing it in Asia and given limited resources to pay people, they took care of Asia. 

They are an irrelevance in the US. No clue why they get so much airtime here.

 

its because its generally classified as a bulge bracket and that makes a bunch of prestige hungry college students go crazy 

 

Been in M&A for 10 years. UBS has always been irrelevant in large cap US M&A and that won’t be changing ever. Stick to Sponsors work Sergio

 

Sunt perspiciatis temporibus temporibus ut quae. Facilis eum quisquam odio impedit expedita. Ut ut accusamus et necessitatibus debitis aut perspiciatis. Omnis perferendis nesciunt autem rerum rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”