S&T Bonus, why so different from IBD?

Could be completely wrong on this and would love to learn more.

Based on some of the numbers I have seen, why aren’t S&T bonuses higher or at least in line with IDB. Based on Morgan Stanley’s 10k trading revenue made up 9.3 billion and ibd did 4.4.

Just curious about it, I have dug a little deeper but not too much. Thanks

 

Answers may vary depending on firm...BUT.

Both S&T and IB are areas where the departments produce easily quantifiable revenue streams. S&T revenue is down across the board because global trading volume (as of the last time I checked) is still less than half of what it was pre-2008. Meanwhile in the IBD sector 2016 set a record for M&A activity. Those two pieces of information alone go a long way towards explaining the difference. On an incidental point the lack of a recovery in trading volume is a key driver of the past few year's volatility.

 
Best Response

Base pay is more or less in line across IBD and S&T at the BBs (at least at the junior level).

At the end of the day, firms compensate employees based on the value they bring to the firm (in theory). Thus if you are a bank you need to pay the amount that will get good people to stay in their seats and generate money. At the junior level hours are considerably worse in banking generally and thus you likely need to pay them a premium.

At the senior level: The trading business may have brought in double the revenue but they did so utilizing considerably more of the firm's assets (the balance sheet) with considerably higher risk levels. In trading you can lose millions of the firm's capital (or billions as recent history has shown) on single trades. To the extent IBD isn't losing its hat underwriting crappy assets, advisory fees are more or less risk free (aside from time). Thus arguably a BB MD who brings in a $10M M&A fee by himself (using the junior resources and research assets like CapIQ) should be paid more than a trader who brought in $10M but put $2Bn of assets at risk in doing so.

 

in general i work 55-60 hours a week. to the last question....it's when you make a lot of revenue for the firm. could be at 25, could be at 28, could be at 30. no hard rules. and it may never happen at all

 

Could you give a more concrete example. Like give some specifics on what an average first year trader might bring in for the firm, and what percentage he can expect from that to be awarded to him.

Is it tiered where if you bring in 10MM for the firm you get 1 percent of that? Etc....

"Cut the burger into thirds, place it on the fries, roll one up homey..." - Epic Meal Time
 

Jimbo and others, How can S&T analyst bonuses be the same as IBD bonuses when IBD analysts slave around their cubes modeling, powerpointing and exceling all day long...

How do I get into S&T after two years of BB IBD experience?

 

b/c bonuses aren't based on hours worked. they are, in theory at least, based on revenue generation and/or value added, which an anlyst in s&t can do just as easily as an ibanking analyst. I agree s&t is not for everyone, and i wouldn't consider doing ibanking. i know it's not for me.

 

I do not think most people undestand this. S&T analysts are not hired into a two year program at many banks. They are hired to stay as long as they do a good job and produce. Also, most trading desks max out at around twenty people. Most desks I have been on are very top-end loaded with many a desk head, one other MD, a few directors/senior VPs, and then some VPs. You could be the only analyst on a desk that produces more than $100MM in revenue. How many groups do that in IBD with twelve people?

Still a lot of people act like S&T bonuses are lesser. I am not sure what the truth is. All I know is that those in trading generally degrees that are generally considered much harder to obtain than a BS in business. For example my trading intern class had many MIT math and CS majors. Additionally, I know that there are people at buldges making $1MM after four years. I do not know anyone doing that in banking or PE. Do you? Still, if I was in trading and worked hard to get an MIT CS or engineering degree, I would be PISSED if someone with a business degree got more than me in IBD, especially if my group made 100 bucks.

 

Unfrotunately I work for a middle market bank and I heard there isnt much mobility between banking and S&T in my firm =( Would biz school be a good transition in to S&T? I've wanted to be a sales person all my life...

 

S&T bonuses are NOT always less than banking. I switched from banking and my bonus will be the same as it would if I was in my old group. As said above, it's about revenue.

Also, MANY S&T programs are within the analyst program at a bank. At least I know mine is and so are those of my friends who work in S&T at other banks. Even the titles are the same at junior levels - analyst, associate, etc.

Trading is a very unique career that is way differnet than IB. Not as many people fit the mold for it. Also there is more risk you will fail and therefore will be out of a job. I do not spend more than 20 minutes doing a task at work, where before I spent hours on models, etc.

And yes, you are pushed out if you suck at S&T. But analysts are pushed out of ib too...I've seen it happen. I think the difference is it becomes clear very early on if S&T is not a good fit for you.

 

Oh. That makes sense I guess, I just thought of the stereotypical white collar "educated" labor vs. blue collar manual work.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Honestly, the hoarders of the Wall Street bonuses will likely go to the top revenue generators. From the 1990s and up through 2007 I understand that at most BB firms tailored their business-models to focus on revenues primarily driven from trading activities. Going forward I think it's safe to say that with Frank-Dodd, Basil III, and an overall more prudent outlook on credit that S&T revenues could be hurt---particularly the guys working in structured products.

That being said, financial markets are still obviously going to operate and they need players who facilitate the processes which means S&T is still going to be a worthy business segment: but will S&T be able to turn as impressive of profits in an environment with so many restrictions and oversight?

I recall a report released by the BCG back in 2009 about how investment banks will likely see fewer revenues from trading: futures, options, equities, forex, and the big obvious one ABS. The report did not cite huge increases in i-banking revenue but it did suggest that i-banking revenues stand to gain as banks attempt re-center their businesses around more traditional operations. I was unable to find a link... :(

Depending on how the financial reforms work in practice as opposed to theory I think traders do stand to lose out a little, especially with the 3% prop-trading restriction. On the other hand do I think that corporate America is going develop a new thirst for M&A when the concepts of synergy and shareholder-value have almost become laughable opposites? I'd be surprised if such an event occurred.

In the end I think it's really going to come down to how pending regulation affects Wall Street's revenue generating ability---and of course---the degree to which Wall Street innovates financial products and services. At this point, it seems that reform is primarily aimed at S&T operations. Who knows how long it will be before the jocks of Wall Street feel the pain.

I say point goes to "team xerox" on this subjective matter.

Thanks!

 
Cold-Steele:
Honestly, the hoarders of the Wall Street bonuses will likely go to the top revenue generators. From the 1990s and up through 2007 I understand that at most BB firms tailored their business-models to focus on revenues primarily driven from trading activities. Going forward I think it's safe to say that with Frank-Dodd, Basil III, and an overall more prudent outlook on credit that S&T revenues could be hurt---particularly the guys working in structured products.

I stopped reading after this paragraph, I think you are horribly wrong.

 
Midas Mulligan Magoo:
The blue collar sedentary IBD has been replaced by a legion of Adderall chomping, Red Bull guzzling, Excel monkeys with their eyes firmly fixed on the Exit Opps prize.

First, I agree that that's not what "blue collar" means. But second, the Excel modeling/PE-dreaming banker isn't comparable to the old-time banker you described. The Exit Opps guy is an analyst or maybe an associate, no older than 30. The old-time banker was the SENIOR guy, and though the stereotype has evolved, MDs don't pull all-nighters, play in excel, or dream about PE.

One of those lights, slightly brighter than the rest, will be my wingtip passing over.
 
the real deal:
I find it odd that the first year IBD analysts get 70k and the first year IBD associates get 100k. Shouldn't there be a bigger difference between these numbers?
  1. They aren't all that happy
  2. 1st year associates receive $40k sign ons + $10k relocation. 1st year analysts only get the $10k relocation.
  3. Salaries starting at 2nd year Associate have all been bumped up significantly
 

Voluptatibus facilis dignissimos eum ad sunt. Quibusdam et aspernatur itaque numquam quod. Sint amet ratione molestiae nostrum. Nesciunt tenetur harum nemo inventore sunt. Eum voluptatem ratione quaerat placeat.

Nobis ipsam architecto asperiores. Atque blanditiis esse sed officiis.

Rerum et quisquam voluptate velit et inventore. Perspiciatis consequuntur ut sequi reiciendis eligendi ipsam. Inventore voluptatem aut beatae quod quaerat voluptatem quo.

 

Cum dolor quia ex qui repellendus omnis vitae facilis. Excepturi eaque ut et. Voluptas tempore ratione id aut consequuntur qui. Veritatis inventore non libero.

Magni sit corrupti sit possimus eos. Rerum id maiores impedit est. Aut exercitationem omnis sapiente ut. Veritatis qui provident nihil. Earum est tenetur fugiat quo molestiae aliquam inventore. Praesentium maiores ullam numquam sequi. Commodi accusantium aut quaerat occaecati.

Enim nihil aut beatae. Ea et dolor maiores quod. Sit adipisci minus ad labore. Ut magni amet ex pariatur laborum.

 

Sed officia nostrum non repudiandae et tenetur qui. Saepe quaerat odio ratione eaque sint sint expedita explicabo. Quod aliquid saepe impedit ea. Dolor voluptas enim ea. Voluptate iure magnam et harum et.

Provident doloribus qui aperiam dolorem non quaerat. Cupiditate mollitia architecto et. Labore eius quia qui numquam. Quis impedit temporibus ratione suscipit dolor.

Molestiae eos sequi cumque provident incidunt quos omnis. Nostrum eligendi quia magni qui. Laborum recusandae magni quia distinctio vel culpa. Cumque aut quo tempora quaerat dolorum quis.

Aut assumenda laborum vel voluptatem similique voluptas. Id saepe ipsum adipisci non atque. Illum distinctio autem voluptatem pariatur temporibus quia animi. Dolorum in fugiat ut aliquid nostrum. Id nemo similique soluta aperiam nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”