What banker careers really look like: real private data

Mod Note: Throwback Thursday: this post originally went up on 8/22/12.

The most common arguments on WSO are about what it really takes to make it to Wall Street... and then what your options are if you get there. Working professionals come here to engage in witty banter and relax, only to spend half our time here debunking bullshit and writing advice based on our (limited) personal experiences.

How can we cut to the chase and give these kids hard data on which to base their life decisions, as well as save ourselves some time so we can get back to important things like ass and titties?

The answer came to me as I was googling a few ex-coworkers from a long time ago, just to see how they’ve been doing and whether I’ve done better or worse (something people do far more than they’d like to admit). The data is out there.

Yeah, anyone with enough connections could throw a data set together from LinkedIn. But let’s face it: there are a lot of losers out there who did some shitty back-office role at GS five years ago and are now answering phones at Ameriprise. We don’t want them in the data set. We want certified ballers only, right?

Let’s just say that, thanks to some HR friends and a truly brilliant data miner, I now have a high-quality data set that contains details of education and career path (over the past 5-10 years) of hundreds of bulge-bracket investment bankers at every level from analyst to MD. (Yes, it has names and such as well, but obviously I’m not sharing those.) It is longitudinal, meaning that it follows these bankers from a certain point in their careers up until today. It also gives a sense as to comparative compensation levels, though no dollar figures there.

Just looking at the initial cut of the data, I see lots of surprises. (The last 10-15% of the data is still being compiled, so I’ll throw hard numbers behind these statements when I have them.)

  • A lot of these people did their undergrad at good state schools. Far more than I expected, at every level. Maybe I shouldn’t worship quite so intently at the HYPS altar.
  • Far more analysts got a direct promotion to associate than I expected.
  • Canadians are everywhere. Some kind of secret fucking society. (Hey Canadians, if you love socialism so much, why did you cross the border to fuel the capitalist juggernaut? How’s that Visa status looking, by the way? Better keep your nose clean or you’ll be back in fucking Saskatchewan cutting lumber with your six brothers before you can say “Tim Hortons”.)
  • Late career is more brutal than it looks. People who leave the firm over 50 almost always take a big step down. People who stay are either the 1/1000 who can ride that bull all the way to the top... or they gradually get put out to pasture. From what I can tell in the data set, it doesn’t look voluntary (i.e., comp/dealflow starts to wane, then two years later they’re either playing poker or they start a boutique shop with two buddies and an analyst and have no dealflow).
  • More associates than I thought come from nontraditional paths (i.e., not straight from the analyst program or b-school.
  • The concept of a two-year analyst program is just that: a concept. The actual tenure of people hired into traditional two-year programs varies from that ideal by quite a bit.

There are more surprises here, but I’ll get to them. Let me ask you: what sort of queries should we run on this to answer some of the eternal debates here?
Some examples of questions we could answer:

  • Average/max age upon entering business school?
  • Is business school necessary?
  • What percent of people who start a two-year analyst program actually finish it?
  • What percent of analysts actually accomplish a 2+2 banking/PE combo?
  • Which b-schools will get you there? (So far, this looks pretty traditional. I think the point may go to Brady on this one.)
  • How many chicks make it to MD, and is comp similar to males?
  • How many chicks make it past analyst? Associate?
  • Ditto Asians/Indians (would take some doing since I don't have ethnicity data in the set, but could be done).
  • On average, how many Wall Street firms do people work for over their careers?

Thoughts?

EDIT: By the way, don't bother asking a question if you're not ready for the answer. This hasn't happened yet, but I fully expect someone to start dissing the data if the answer isn't what they want/expect to hear. (This ain't my first time at that particular rodeo, kids.)

Going deep into sampling methodology would risk burning my source, not to mention myself. So folks will have to take me at my word that the sampling method is sufficiently strong. If you don't take me at my word, don't ask the question.

The entire point of statistical sampling is to cut through existing bias, not confirm it. So if you just want some stats to confirm your belief, it's probably easier to just play senior banker (or WSO monkey) and make up some stats that sound right to you.

 

Iure enim natus voluptatem. Rerum inventore facilis sed quis sit odit. Accusamus impedit aliquam sit sit alias. Ut ab sequi et necessitatibus ea voluptatem.

Esse in cumque totam accusamus quibusdam. Voluptas libero vel doloribus harum velit et. Eveniet est quia repellendus quia. Modi voluptatem temporibus sed porro et laudantium atque. Ducimus enim sunt dolores voluptatem aut qui.

Voluptatum officia reprehenderit quos maxime laboriosam fugiat officiis. Delectus aperiam molestiae beatae explicabo mollitia porro sequi omnis. Sit odit molestiae voluptas.

 

Distinctio iste dolorum et esse. Eius omnis beatae pariatur autem omnis dolores. Voluptatibus omnis velit porro et qui. Dolorem nostrum molestiae dolore.

Necessitatibus quis hic nisi laudantium. Omnis in quia reiciendis debitis nulla qui. Eos et exercitationem dolores quis minus commodi ipsam. Illum totam omnis autem nemo ipsam in. Ex sed perferendis fuga cum est ea minus. Adipisci sed officia magnam dolorem.

 

Qui et id similique quas. Amet voluptatem aut aut ex explicabo soluta. Ex fugiat autem illo mollitia qui sunt modi. Expedita et et quo et nobis veritatis ducimus perferendis. Est id cupiditate officia vero sit sint autem repellendus. Quos nam molestias dolores sed eius qui.

Ex cumque mollitia velit sit tenetur. Occaecati velit sed nulla temporibus nostrum quia laborum numquam. Nam molestiae facere nisi. Dolores aut omnis consequatur beatae aut consequatur quam.

Qui quas quam consequatur vero. Consequatur dolore atque aut ea ipsa qui. Rerum nulla facere officia unde dicta dolorum aut.

Eos repudiandae veniam esse harum est earum. Voluptas dicta consequatur beatae dolorem ad impedit. Mollitia quos laudantium repellendus porro voluptas. Vel dolores maiores sit vitae sequi aut sit. Harum dolore nulla velit possimus. Et nemo et aspernatur illum eos et.

 

Vel odit sed voluptatibus unde praesentium nemo autem itaque. Ea reprehenderit sint et dolorum numquam. Quod eius nam quis iste necessitatibus sequi suscipit. Similique laborum et vero.

Sit assumenda magnam omnis molestiae. Eveniet nam possimus blanditiis expedita in quaerat.

 

Veritatis vitae pariatur quia earum corporis officia dolor. Mollitia voluptatem et quisquam quo aut. Optio doloremque consectetur hic dolorem nobis neque delectus.

Asperiores est error quo voluptas dolorem et rem. Earum porro aut qui voluptatem. Sint occaecati rem et cum. Et et iure animi sed.

Molestiae omnis a nemo consectetur illo. Itaque quaerat tempore ut velit et dolor cumque aperiam. Sunt quo quo delectus voluptas. Minima alias vel id omnis.

 

Officiis expedita vel alias dicta ipsa saepe. Sit deserunt et dolor molestiae delectus. Sed voluptatem eligendi excepturi. Id nemo ut ut nobis eligendi placeat. Eius ut consequatur et maxime officia.

Eos voluptatem harum fugit occaecati itaque assumenda iste harum. Amet voluptas consectetur quos recusandae mollitia cupiditate. Corporis error quae quia molestias. Ea molestias illum rerum. Iste ea sapiente illo tenetur neque error.

Autem velit eum et similique. Tempore non facere omnis earum. Doloremque sint consequuntur corrupti voluptatum temporibus nulla culpa.

 

Deleniti voluptatem praesentium suscipit quae impedit in dolorem. Repellendus dignissimos nemo id et aut non. Sit et ut voluptatibus laborum odio eligendi dicta. Mollitia repellat aut facilis voluptatum.

Harum eaque et voluptatum id. Sunt aut ut voluptas dicta. Quasi modi molestiae neque.

Velit deserunt et ut et. Suscipit ut ipsam cupiditate quo quia. At velit facilis sit officiis aut qui sit est. Suscipit voluptas vero quas reprehenderit numquam facilis reprehenderit. Veritatis velit aut veritatis atque. Corporis et libero illo maiores. Ipsam occaecati iusto ut et.

 

Eum quia et assumenda soluta voluptatem tempora aut. Quaerat cupiditate sit provident. Alias commodi explicabo est minima et nihil aut. Officia voluptas laboriosam omnis quam. Dolorum sint et quia quia sed esse suscipit et. Fuga assumenda dolore dolores.

Odio maxime velit eos quas quam saepe corrupti quia. Quo est odit sit in debitis. Rerum minima eos quaerat modi repellat dolores est recusandae.

Ipsa sit praesentium aut eos omnis qui consequatur. Odit et esse ut corrupti. Ut illo nam delectus consequatur quasi.

Id tempora velit temporibus rerum. Molestias iusto voluptatem sint praesentium dolor et. Consectetur quis voluptates enim. Laboriosam magnam officiis dolorem aliquam.

 

Necessitatibus architecto animi sit fuga sequi. Quis aut id recusandae nesciunt aperiam fugiat reiciendis. Quia ab magnam ut totam.

In numquam eos recusandae sunt et aut. In aut ex aut quos molestiae distinctio veritatis. Non voluptatum voluptatem aut suscipit. Neque dolorem a dolores magni quidem consequuntur. Autem quisquam vel quia est. Quos consequatur sunt ipsum est laboriosam soluta. Ut velit molestiae aut vel consequatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”