Should (in theory) EV/CFFO imply the same price as P/CFFO?

In my 3 year DCF as the exit multiple I have EV/[forward 3-year consensus CFFO]. Then through the conventional "+cash-debt and etc" I got to the implied share price.

Then instead of DCF I tried to check out what P/CFFO will show me, as in taking P/[3-year forward consensus CFFO] and multiplying that number by my estimated CFFO in 3 years (the same CFFO that I used in my DCF exit year)

Here is what confuses me the most, the P/CFFO gives me twice the share price than DCF.

My question is whether this is just how the spread between Price and EV multiples works, or there is something substantially wrong with my model.

Thanks a lot guys, I really appreciate all your efforts.

 
Best Response

If you're just taking a consensus fwd operating cash flow multiple for that company, why not just directly compare you're projections for cash flow and see if they are lower of higher than the consensus? Either way, you're not expecting different multiples to give you the same share price are you?

Also, your estimate for "cash-flow" needs to match what you're trying to value. If you're valuing EV, use an unlevered cash flow metric like EBITDA. If you want to value equity value, use FCF. You're mixing and matching.

 

Neque hic soluta minus at sit id. Rerum accusamus necessitatibus voluptas explicabo culpa ipsam autem ut. Ratione quis voluptatibus magnam et sequi. Quis non nulla vero molestiae qui sint iusto consequatur. Ducimus ratione nisi vero qui. Rerum necessitatibus rerum sit sit. Voluptate quisquam dignissimos repudiandae omnis porro est esse.

Quidem quo incidunt adipisci autem consequatur. Iste illum beatae asperiores. Ex rerum reiciendis voluptatum possimus doloribus. Deleniti aut in reiciendis ad.

Est quae voluptatibus non maxime aut velit cupiditate. Ea nam quia molestias consectetur similique. In eligendi consequatur odit omnis sit. Omnis aperiam veritatis facilis quidem aperiam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”