Wharton undergrad... would math PhD be ridiculous??
I am a rising fourth year student at Penn doing dual degree finance/ computer science with Wharton and Penn Engineering... Working this summer as an SA at Allstate Investments in Chicago writing VBA programs for ABS traders and am getting really interested in some sort of quant career at a bank/hedge fund, but am kinda of the understanding that Wall Street quants are like almost invariably expected to have some sort of advanced degree in something quant'ish... starting to get interested in some sort of doctorate in Math as a result but it seems like killing myself w/ 4-5 more years of school is a pretty big step especially since coming out of Penn it seems like I could probably get a pretty decent-paying entry level finance job without killing myself for another degree. It seems like PhD programs are pretty tiny and selective, and I don't have a 3.8+ undergrad GPA or anything ridiculous like that, if I'm lucky I'll graduate with about a 3.5 or so. Does anyone know about admissions to grad programs?? I don't have a good feel for my chances at all of getting into a top PhD program and it only seems worth it if I managed to get in somewhere good... Seems like the starting salary for quants w/ a doctorate is like 200-300k or so and since 4 years getting a doctorate could be spent instead as two years as an analyst somewhere then two years MBA then associate, the starting salary of an associate to my understanding also being like ~200-300k, the doctorate doesn't seem totally unfeasible... kinda a big decision to be making though and i don't really know anything about this stuff. any insight would be greatly appreciated... thanks
My understanding is that it is only worth pursuing a PhD if you are really-really interested in that particular field and could imagine yourself being a prof sooner or later (say, after 10-15 in years in a quant job, when you have already made enough to retire). If you "only" want to do business, I think a PhD would be too big of a sacrifice, in terms of time.
Go talk to your professors. A few that you really trust. You're a smart kid: a PhD is no small undertaking. If you're just doing it to get it as another accolade on the road to something, you might not have the heart to finish it. They will be able to give you the best advice
Quants seem to tend to end up in trading (see: banking requires nothing mathematical of you beyond what a calculator can do). Get on the phone with some alumni that are doing trading, or working at very quant-oriented shops (DE Shaw, Citadel) and ask them about their experiences. Hearing from the source is the best way to decide what you want to do.
Way to double post this.
yeah, sorry.....
just joined yesterday, thought posting on two different forums could increase the visibility of it... still appreciate any insight on either, though
Why not do an MFE in one of the top programs ? Its usually only a 1 year program and you can then consider a Phd if its not enough. Having a combined comp sci and finance background makes you a likely candidate. Just try to get your gpa up to 3.5
there's no doubt saying "hey i have a phd in math or physics" is a great way to get hired on wall street or hedge funds...but i think most of those guys don't go into it thinking that way, they just find out there are no jobs in academia. your best bet is probably to get hired out of undergrad at a quant HF that will let you do research. the question then would be does not having that phd hurt you later on..i don't know.
I completely agree with you, coming out of Penn with highly quantitative coursework as well as a decent GPA (by Math/Engineering standards), I think that you might be better off to see what it is actually LIKE working there. Get a S&T job for 2 years and see if you really like it, especially the quantitative side. If you do, maybe that would be a sign to get a Masters or PHD, but I would recommend that you be 100% sure before you drop money and more importantly, 5 years of your life, on something your not sure of.
A PhD in Stats with coursework in Stochastic Calculus will be much more useful than one in math.
A PhD is not a profesional degree. 4-5 years from now you have no idea what wall st. will look like or where your mind will be. If you want to work on Wall St., go get a job on Wall St.
I'll bet you a beer that if you go get that PhD you never end up working in this industry.
I know where you are at. Look into the FInancial Engineering program at Berkeley and Columbia. Benninga referred me to those as I was in your same position.
However I decided to go IBD and not do quant.
Get a master degree in Finance.
Wharton undergrad considering Math PhD (Originally Posted: 07/27/2008)
I am a rising fourth year student at Penn doing dual degree finance/ computer science with Wharton and Penn Engineering... Working this summer as an SA at Allstate Investments in Chicago writing VBA programs for ABS traders and am getting really interested in some sort of quant career at a bank/hedge fund, but am kinda of the understanding that Wall Street quants are like almost invariably expected to have some sort of advanced degree in something quant'ish... starting to get interested in some sort of doctorate in Math as a result but it seems like killing myself w/ 4-5 more years of school is a pretty big step especially since coming out of Penn it seems like I could probably get a pretty decent-paying entry level finance job without killing myself for another degree. It seems like PhD programs are pretty tiny and selective, and I don't have a 3.8+ undergrad GPA or anything ridiculous like that, if I'm lucky I'll graduate with about a 3.5 or so. Does anyone know about admissions to grad programs?? I feel like I could probably nail the quant section of the GRE if I studied enough, but with the non-ridiculous GPA I don't have a good feel for my chances at all of getting into a top PhD program and it only seems worth it if I managed to get in somewhere good... Seems like the starting salary for quants w/ a doctorate is like 200-300k or so and since 4 years getting a doctorate could be spent instead as two years as an analyst somewhere then two years MBA then associate, the starting salary of an associate to my understanding also being like ~200-300k, the doctorate doesn't seem totally unfeasible... kinda a big decision to be making though and i don't really know anything about this stuff. any insight would be greatly appreciated... thanks
ha ha - you are optimistic -
yes quant salary is roughly same as mba assoc. high end finance salary. up side is lower though - also quant is sometimes euphemism for other things, rather than what you might imagine. also math phd is not easiest way to quant land (depending on type of math). also 4 years for phd is beyond aggressive - i think 6-7 is more realistic for a math phd. there are quants who don't have phds - they just are few and far in between. getting into a top phd program is much harder (% admit wise) than getting into a top analyst program. go join the real world for a couple of years - if you want to do phd after that, reconsider.
Error est nulla impedit deleniti. Laborum omnis aliquam voluptates ad quis aliquid. Eaque similique excepturi quisquam omnis inventore. Itaque sed consequuntur molestias quidem aut ullam cum. Sunt excepturi adipisci et vel. Totam repellat architecto rerum est ea velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...