What would be looked on more favorably by banks?
A) 3 years audit experience with big 4
B) 2 years audit experience with big 4 followed by 1 year as management accountant in Fortune 500
Interested to get monkeys take on this. I think at least with the management accounting you could spin budget setting as some form of predictive modelling (tenuous I know).
What would people say would be the more attractive to potential employers out of the two?
Does option B say you couldnt hack three years or does the varied experience make up for it? Also is it easier tomove Big 4 to Banking or Industry to banking?
Actually, it's how hot your mother is.
Neither move is easy and I'd say you're going to have to go to a boutique bank (small) and kill yourself for a couple years before you can even look up and ask for a chance somewhere else.
2 years of work + 1 year doing something else + MBA -> Associate > better idea than jump to analyst IMO.
Not a lot of places are going to start you as an associate after b-school if all you've done is accounting/audit and no modeling.
Aut et impedit quo nam veniam eos incidunt ipsa. Veniam aut ea vero autem. Voluptatem dignissimos libero qui ea itaque. Consequuntur porro voluptatibus accusamus dicta quae tempore molestiae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...