Waterfall Scenario * Explain?

After reading through these forums and some job posts, I have came across the waterfall scenario. Does anyone have a good grasp on what this is. Can you explain it in further detail and the ins and outs of the scenario. Any help would be appreciated.

 

You derive an end value to something, say a valuation or an earnings figure, for the purposes of this illustration I'll say earnings.

Let's assume in t0 you earned 100. You could then create a chart with your base earnings of 100 at the far left, then various adjustments (i.e. sector incomes such as investment banking fees (+12), trading gains (+7), mortgage defaults (-9) and net interest (-3) which will take you to your end earnings number of 107.

Waterfall distribution is designed to encourage confidence from the investor in the PE fund. Once the investor receives his/her money back, plus a preferred return, the general partners (i.e. PE fund) then participate in the profits. The kicker, is that general partners typically invest a small a share of the initial equity (

Fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds of run. - Kipling
 
prospie:

This is a little different from what I'm used to, but it came up on Google and should give you an idea: www.exinfm.com/excel%20files/Cash%20Flow%20Waterfa...

This is my understanding of a waterfall analysis in Real Estate. The developer won't be able to put nearly as much equity into the project but as the project attains a higher IRR and surpasses a new IRR hurdle the developer will receive more cash flow than their pro-rata share would normally provide them.

 

What Gene basically said. You have general partners that have a very small stake, say 10%. Even though they invested 10%, that's not the portion they are receiving now. The PE firm or fund will take mostly everything and then the general partner will slowly begin to see profits. This is mainly done by general partners who dont want to allocate alot of capital to a project. 10% of a 25% equity interest(assuming 75% debt) in a project means the GP only had to put up 2.5% of the total project cost. Hope this helps.

Array
 
Best Response

Waterfall is an allusion to capital flowing down the cap table in a liquidation event. Different investment tranches have different terms and you need to model how that impacts investor payouts in different scenarios (usually date and valuation are your different scenarios, also terms of the new tranche if this is growth capital instead of just liquidating). It's too complicated to explain coherently in a post on here. If you have to do waterfall analysis for a job, your employer will almost certainly train you on how to model one.

As other posters have mentioned, same rationale can be applied to the fund level too, it's the same concept (when at fund level it's usually just the LPs and GPs as two separate tranches). It's common when the GPs don't have enough to invest their pro-rata share.

I did a lot of waterfall scenario analysis when I was in PE and we were considering selling or investing in a company. They are not fun, especially when you have multiple tranches with vastly differing terms. You're talking tons of nested ifs in your formulas, tons of testing to make sure they work properly, etc. They're one of the hardest things within financial modeling (now some douche quant person is going to come and chime in about modeling complicated options, swaps, etc. and how waterfalls are a joke haha).

 

Et voluptatem modi error saepe occaecati cupiditate. Ab explicabo adipisci et aut. Et odit consequatur nam amet ut omnis accusamus. Ea eius qui enim eos et reprehenderit harum.

Ratione doloremque consequatur voluptatem et. Nihil dolorem asperiores illum sed ab accusamus sed. Quis atque dicta nemo incidunt voluptatem quo expedita consequuntur. Minus laudantium sint eveniet.

Asperiores unde tempora mollitia consectetur numquam. Quod voluptatem provident vel eaque id vero vitae. Hic aut animi occaecati non blanditiis deleniti. Quae maxime aspernatur dolores iste saepe magni perferendis. Distinctio libero tenetur labore ab quisquam sequi aut. Magni aspernatur ipsa sint dolores. Ut atque quam voluptatem sit tempora praesentium fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”