MMmonkeyI find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.
For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573
I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
Marcus_HalberstramI disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
And the guy was not his employee.
No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.
Sit consequuntur sed modi temporibus. Et numquam culpa animi quis. Quia et aut ipsam recusandae est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
I find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.
For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573
I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
And the guy was not his employee.
No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.
My mistake, haven't seen that. Do you have a link?
Sit consequuntur sed modi temporibus. Et numquam culpa animi quis. Quia et aut ipsam recusandae est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...