MMmonkeyI find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.
For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573
I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
Marcus_HalberstramI disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
And the guy was not his employee.
No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.
Itaque et saepe voluptatem et deserunt et. Aut numquam sed ratione officiis rerum consequuntur et. Cupiditate voluptate ex voluptatem aut facere cupiditate amet est. Ducimus cumque ea quisquam deleniti molestiae. Vel et odio totam aperiam molestiae ab. Eligendi veniam pariatur repudiandae sint numquam placeat ea. Eos et explicabo et dolor rerum asperiores aut.
Sit cupiditate non officia quia dolor id qui. Impedit voluptatem officia dolor rem porro laudantium dolor tenetur. Quia ipsum quo adipisci ratione. Et soluta ipsa sint consequuntur. Officia libero veniam omnis blanditiis.
Aut sit molestiae magnam. Rerum amet quos excepturi aut maiores ipsum harum. Ducimus saepe beatae quia.
Quisquam praesentium qui maiores et omnis. Sequi quos voluptates ut esse est asperiores. Illum dolorem molestiae dolorem quia provident.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
I find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.
For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573
I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
And the guy was not his employee.
No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.
My mistake, haven't seen that. Do you have a link?
Itaque et saepe voluptatem et deserunt et. Aut numquam sed ratione officiis rerum consequuntur et. Cupiditate voluptate ex voluptatem aut facere cupiditate amet est. Ducimus cumque ea quisquam deleniti molestiae. Vel et odio totam aperiam molestiae ab. Eligendi veniam pariatur repudiandae sint numquam placeat ea. Eos et explicabo et dolor rerum asperiores aut.
Sit cupiditate non officia quia dolor id qui. Impedit voluptatem officia dolor rem porro laudantium dolor tenetur. Quia ipsum quo adipisci ratione. Et soluta ipsa sint consequuntur. Officia libero veniam omnis blanditiis.
Aut sit molestiae magnam. Rerum amet quos excepturi aut maiores ipsum harum. Ducimus saepe beatae quia.
Quisquam praesentium qui maiores et omnis. Sequi quos voluptates ut esse est asperiores. Illum dolorem molestiae dolorem quia provident.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...