Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +19 | 3x SWE FAANG Intern -> Fundamental Analyst @ HF | 10 | 1h |
| +9 | PM is a dumbass | 5 | 5d |
| +5 | Fund 1 8%, fund 2 5%, when will fund implode? | 4 | 6h |
| +3 | Castle Hook Partners | 0 | 4d |
| +3 | Disclosed non public fund performance to a headhunter | 2 | 4d |
| +3 | Dragoneer | 1 | 14h |
Career Resources
I find his discussion about treating employees well in contrast to the only public record out there about how he treats employees.
For those interested in learning more, see 323 F. Supp. 2d 573
I disagree. The MD that was inquiring about a job obviously had way too big of an ego for a HF guy that just got axed. Loeb asked a very simple question, and the guy was just too uptight and obnoxious to appreciate a somewhat non-traditional approach.
And the guy was not his employee.
No offense, but you don't know what I'm referring to. I am not referring to what you are talking about. That was an exchange of e-mails. I am referring to a publicly available SDNY court opinion that involves an actual employee.
My mistake, haven't seen that. Do you have a link?
Soluta et numquam qui sit ullam veniam unde consectetur. Rerum temporibus expedita molestiae omnis illum. Natus omnis assumenda autem fuga dolor.
Culpa commodi quos tempore nihil aliquam cumque aut. Et perferendis doloremque sed.
Praesentium exercitationem et ut expedita. Rem aut illo consequatur itaque saepe suscipit. Expedita deserunt molestias eligendi sed. Aliquid quaerat sint quia.
Optio deleniti nesciunt repellat. Distinctio provident doloribus consectetur sequi. Aliquid vitae non ea tempora at omnis id neque. Sint qui quo qui quidem velit placeat et ea. Ipsam odio voluptatem quas eos officiis et asperiores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...