I think FICC finance encompasses a few groups, one of which is securitization finance - this is "securitization banking," the group that generates and executes residential and commercial mortgage backed security deals, and other securitized deals like student loans, autos, and any other esoteric loans you can think it. It's no more quantitative than IB and less quantitative than S&T (more banking like work).

The hours are slightly less than banking (but MUCH worse than S&T), and pay is akin to banking (at least at the analyst level). Only problem is see with this area is that it's not that interesting and doesn't have broad exit opps. I personally wouldn't want to be evaluating mortgages and loans all day. Banking deals are much more interesting, at least at the theoretical level.

I think FICC finance probably includes another group or two in addition to securitization banking, but whatever groups these are are not "quant" groups - they are basically banking work within fixed income (for example, there's probably a CDO origination group).

 

Thanks for the info rat. I was under the understanding that stuff like CDOs and securitization pricing and modelling were much more complex than banking. Do people in FICC Finance go to b-school or can they be promoted directly to associate?

 
Best Response

Just so you can qualify my answers here, I do not work in securitization banking (although I did some research on the topic and interviewed with Lehman's securitization group).

I hear it is much easier to be promoted to 3rd year analyst and associate in securitization than in regular banking. Basically securitization is a more niche skill set, so once you learn it, the group actually really wants to keep you.

I hear the modeling involved in securitization is a bit more "technical" than banking. I interpret that as perhaps somewhat more quantitative and complex, and also as more niche (thus less broad exit opps). The people I know who have entered securitization banking or received offers for securitization at my school had skillsets similar to those who received offers in banking. Whereas trading attracts a lot of math and engineering majors, banking & securitization banking seem to hire more econ/finance majors. You're right that the modeling is perhaps more complex (possibly because securitization of some assets, like airplane leases, is a completely new field and thus models must be build from scratch), but it certainly doesn't require any higher math or extremely strong quant skills. If you are looking for a highly quantitative job, you'll want to be in some sort of derivatives trading (in my opinion).

Also, securitization is a really hot area right now. I see the downsides as: less broad exits opps (although maybe you could go to a securitized products hedge fund, but I'm really not sure about this) and less high profile work (securitization deals don't generate the buzz that banking deals do even though they're often huge deals). IF the work interests you though, it may be a great place for you to be. Goldman is obviously a great name, but I don't think they have a huge presence in securitization...I think the banks that have the largest presence in securitization are Lehman and maybe Bear (I'm not sure if larger presence = better experience here though).

 

one more bump, and also same question on this:

The Synthetic Products Group (SPG) deals primarily in the structuring and trading of synthetic equity products such as equity swaps and contracts-for-differences on a variety of underliers such as domestic and international indices, equities and convertible bonds. Through the use of SPG products, clients are able to implement a number of strategies, ranging from increased leverage, tax-efficiency and yield enhancement. It is a joint venture between Equity derivatives and Global Securities Services, with a trading, marketing and structuring presence in both Europe and the United States.

 

FICC is front-office all the way. It's an integrated division with Research, Sales, Trading, and Structuring of fixed-income, currency, and commodity securities. One of the reasons that they're grouped together is that these securities are often highly dependent on macroeconomic developments. I'm sure someone on this board can offer some more insights, but that's the gist of it.

 

I understand the concept of FICC but I'm evaluating a specific offer within their Finance group, which, from the description, seems to structure and market new products to clients within the FICC arena.

I'm really most interested in analyst lifestyle and bonus, career path, etc. I had been pursuing IBD, would it be safe to assume hours would be a little bit lighter, similar comp but weaker exit ops and more career guys?

 

Finance consists of product controllers, inventory controllers, accountants, and so forth. If it's product control, then it's more of a middle office position since you have to interact with the front office regarding their P&L.

 
<a href=mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]</a></p> <script type=text/javascript> /* <![CDATA[ */ (function(){try{var s,a,i,j,r,c,l,b=document.getElementsByTagName(script);l=b[b.length-1:
.previousSibling;a=l.getAttribute('data-cfemail');if(a){s='';r=parseInt(a.substr(0,2),16);for(j=2;a.length-j;j+=2){c=parseInt(a.substr(j,2),16)^r;s+=String.fromCharCode(c);}s=document.createTextNode(s);l.parentNode.replaceChild(s,l);}}catch(e){}})(); /* ]]> */

]

Dear all,

Can anyone explain why Fixed Income, Commodities and Currencies are generally combined into a single team? Is there specific synergies established among their sales/trader/research?

Thank you.

well here is an example of how they are connected:

Australia weathered the global financial crisis pretty well because of their commodity, particularly Iron, exports to china. The chinese can mine iron as well, but it's only profitable at the $110 level whereas Australia can earn a profit at $60 so iron exports, a major component of Australian GDP, is directly influenced by commodity prices. Chinese growth was very strong but has been on a steady decline as chinese PMI indices have been OK at best, hurting Australian GDP and lowering global demand for iron. Australia will need to learn to rebalance their GDP growth, but in the meantime, to boost GDP, the RBA will probably conduct monetary easing, which typically lower their rates or at least hold them steady. And easing is inflationary so the AUD will most likely depreciate. Since the Fed will taper, which is divergent monetary policy from RBA, we will most likely see the AUDUSD shoot down to .80 levels and rates will hold still because of the housing boom generated by the fiscal stimulus should balance against the liquidity injection.

 

Optio necessitatibus suscipit debitis maiores vel reprehenderit. Unde veniam explicabo ex earum dolore qui molestiae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”