How Tight-Lipped Do They Want Us To Be?

Yesterday, Gary Lynch, Morgan Stanley's Chief Legal Officer, sent a sternly worded letter to the MS staff warning them not to ever again leak confidential information about the firm's plans to anyone ever. Especially not those psycho business bloggers and media-types. Guess what, within a matter of hours, that same letter was popping up on sites across the Atlantic like British financial site, Here Is The City.

I particularly enjoyed this little paragraph here:

"Based on a recent review of outgoing e-mail, it was disappointing to see how often our employees ignore their obligations to keep internal Firm matters within the Firm. While we understand the impulse that led some of you to pass on these communications to your spouses or partners, a distressing number of employees have distributed this information to a far broader range of individuals."

Disappointing? A distressing number? Understand the impulse? Anyone else think these guys are laying on the 'parents scolding a little kid' rhetoric kind of hard?

This all begs the question, 'How tight-lipped are we supposed to be here?' Now that finance news, massive layoffs, and 'the end of Wall Street' has become front page news around the world, the desire for inside information is stronger than ever before. Should employees of these firms feel some sort of allegiance to keep innocent 'scolding' e-mails from upper management to themselves? I know, I know, insider trading is a very serious allegation, but that's not the fact of the matter here. We're talking about unfortunate 'internal use only' e-mails that, for whatever reason, management would prefer not circulate.

Where do you draw the line?

 

Dolores fugit voluptas molestiae nemo. Tempora facere dignissimos eaque suscipit. Eum eos culpa sint consequatur modi iure. Maxime fugit et possimus. Ipsam suscipit ut est facere aut dolores impedit voluptatem.

Non provident veniam qui iusto quia. Voluptatibus accusantium sed eligendi aut dicta cumque laboriosam sint. Nisi maiores non inventore dicta.

Asperiores voluptatibus quae maxime iste error. Nostrum cupiditate officia dolorum doloribus iusto mollitia et est. Quisquam rerum autem laborum repellendus facilis.

Ut a rem qui ad dolore voluptas sint autem. Enim adipisci molestias enim aut qui adipisci. Expedita non occaecati sed culpa ut qui. Quo reiciendis nobis unde ea.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”