How Tight-Lipped Do They Want Us To Be?

Yesterday, Gary Lynch, Morgan Stanley's Chief Legal Officer, sent a sternly worded letter to the MS staff warning them not to ever again leak confidential information about the firm's plans to anyone ever. Especially not those psycho business bloggers and media-types. Guess what, within a matter of hours, that same letter was popping up on sites across the Atlantic like British financial site, Here Is The City.

I particularly enjoyed this little paragraph here:

"Based on a recent review of outgoing e-mail, it was disappointing to see how often our employees ignore their obligations to keep internal Firm matters within the Firm. While we understand the impulse that led some of you to pass on these communications to your spouses or partners, a distressing number of employees have distributed this information to a far broader range of individuals."

Disappointing? A distressing number? Understand the impulse? Anyone else think these guys are laying on the 'parents scolding a little kid' rhetoric kind of hard?

This all begs the question, 'How tight-lipped are we supposed to be here?' Now that finance news, massive layoffs, and 'the end of Wall Street' has become front page news around the world, the desire for inside information is stronger than ever before. Should employees of these firms feel some sort of allegiance to keep innocent 'scolding' e-mails from upper management to themselves? I know, I know, insider trading is a very serious allegation, but that's not the fact of the matter here. We're talking about unfortunate 'internal use only' e-mails that, for whatever reason, management would prefer not circulate.

Where do you draw the line?

3 Comments
 

i like the previous post of someone with a camera taking a picture of the screen with the email up. good workaround -- that creativity might let him keep his job

 

Animi quam sed consectetur quod saepe at sunt cupiditate. Quam et mollitia libero consequatur. Et dolor odit suscipit eaque. Consequatur quia ad in distinctio perferendis ut. Minus esse voluptas officiis aut natus illo deleniti tempore. Porro magnam libero quis perspiciatis consequatur est et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”