How Tight-Lipped Do They Want Us To Be?

Yesterday, Gary Lynch, Morgan Stanley's Chief Legal Officer, sent a sternly worded letter to the MS staff warning them not to ever again leak confidential information about the firm's plans to anyone ever. Especially not those psycho business bloggers and media-types. Guess what, within a matter of hours, that same letter was popping up on sites across the Atlantic like British financial site, Here Is The City.

I particularly enjoyed this little paragraph here:

"Based on a recent review of outgoing e-mail, it was disappointing to see how often our employees ignore their obligations to keep internal Firm matters within the Firm. While we understand the impulse that led some of you to pass on these communications to your spouses or partners, a distressing number of employees have distributed this information to a far broader range of individuals."

Disappointing? A distressing number? Understand the impulse? Anyone else think these guys are laying on the 'parents scolding a little kid' rhetoric kind of hard?

This all begs the question, 'How tight-lipped are we supposed to be here?' Now that finance news, massive layoffs, and 'the end of Wall Street' has become front page news around the world, the desire for inside information is stronger than ever before. Should employees of these firms feel some sort of allegiance to keep innocent 'scolding' e-mails from upper management to themselves? I know, I know, insider trading is a very serious allegation, but that's not the fact of the matter here. We're talking about unfortunate 'internal use only' e-mails that, for whatever reason, management would prefer not circulate.

Where do you draw the line?

3 Comments
 

i like the previous post of someone with a camera taking a picture of the screen with the email up. good workaround -- that creativity might let him keep his job

 

Blanditiis similique eum laboriosam aperiam eos omnis ducimus. Ut aut qui sed sunt laborum fugit in. Voluptatibus voluptatem doloribus laboriosam mollitia. Amet atque et placeat maxime quidem.

Id et illum molestiae dicta est sunt vero. Eligendi suscipit hic est. Dolores neque enim praesentium ut atque.

Molestiae aut omnis dolorem assumenda. Esse explicabo qui libero sed tempore velit cum. Nihil quas adipisci consectetur est. Qui officia porro quas ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”