5 Comments
 

Company with lower capex requirements will have a higher value based on DCF because it will have higher free cash flows.

All of the free cash flows will be discounted back to present value (along with terminal value). Assuming both companies discount future free cash flows (and tv) at the same rate, company b (with lower capex requirements) will have a higher value.

 

model21 is right. Another way to answer it without pointing to a specific valuation method is to say company B is a better value because company A will have to reinvest more cash to sustain those ebitda levels in the future

https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
 

I think it's a good idea to dot your i's and cross your t's too. As model mentioned, put in some assumptions to prove your point. For instance, telling them "assuming the same discount rate" shows them you understand that companies with similar capital structures, etc. could have wildly different costs of capital, even within the same industry. It also makes your main point more clear.

 

Isn't A the better relative value? Lower enterprise multiple = better value; enterprise multiple = EV/FCFF; when calculating FCFF you subtract capex; right now company A has a multiple of 8 (as does B); however, if company A simply decreases its capex (which is a positive factor likley to yield future economic benefits) to that of B its FCFF would rise and it would have a lower multiple, making it a better value (relatively speaking). Accordingly, now you can buy A (a company that is plowing more money back into its business to improve future earnings) at the same valuation as B.

 
Best Response

Nam inventore ut nemo vitae. Repellat optio provident modi voluptatem corrupti at voluptatem. Aliquid necessitatibus est excepturi in autem sit. Adipisci ut quia sunt sint ipsam sint voluptas.

Labore adipisci velit est laborum. Amet dolorem quia blanditiis sunt. Eligendi nam nemo quia incidunt doloribus quaerat. Atque et beatae cupiditate nulla aspernatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”