Interview Question - Two companies have an enterprise multiple
Two companies have an enterprise multiple of 8. Company A has higher CapEx than B. Which one is a better value? Why?
Two companies have an enterprise multiple of 8. Company A has higher CapEx than B. Which one is a better value? Why?
| +38 | Interns - AI usage, don’t put yourself out of a job | 6 | 2d |
| +20 | How Do I Make Friends During My SA? | 10 | 16h |
| +18 | What’s something you wish you knew before applying for internships? | 2 | 5d |
| +13 | Forced into FP&A | 2 | 4d |
| +12 | spring week cv advice | 1 | 16h |
| +12 | Addressing Transfer Status for Recruiting | 1 | 7h |
| +11 | Seeking Career Advice | 3 | 2d |
| +9 | Rising sophomore trying to pivot to finance | 1 | 8h |
| +9 | FT Recruiting – Profile Check & Advice | 1 | 5d |
| +9 | Are Traditional Job Boards Becoming Obsolete in the Age of AI? | 1 | 3d |
Career Resources
Company with lower capex requirements will have a higher value based on DCF because it will have higher free cash flows.
All of the free cash flows will be discounted back to present value (along with terminal value). Assuming both companies discount future free cash flows (and tv) at the same rate, company b (with lower capex requirements) will have a higher value.
model21 is right. Another way to answer it without pointing to a specific valuation method is to say company B is a better value because company A will have to reinvest more cash to sustain those ebitda levels in the future
I think it's a good idea to dot your i's and cross your t's too. As model mentioned, put in some assumptions to prove your point. For instance, telling them "assuming the same discount rate" shows them you understand that companies with similar capital structures, etc. could have wildly different costs of capital, even within the same industry. It also makes your main point more clear.
Isn't A the better relative value? Lower enterprise multiple = better value; enterprise multiple = EV/FCFF; when calculating FCFF you subtract capex; right now company A has a multiple of 8 (as does B); however, if company A simply decreases its capex (which is a positive factor likley to yield future economic benefits) to that of B its FCFF would rise and it would have a lower multiple, making it a better value (relatively speaking). Accordingly, now you can buy A (a company that is plowing more money back into its business to improve future earnings) at the same valuation as B.
Nam inventore ut nemo vitae. Repellat optio provident modi voluptatem corrupti at voluptatem. Aliquid necessitatibus est excepturi in autem sit. Adipisci ut quia sunt sint ipsam sint voluptas.
Labore adipisci velit est laborum. Amet dolorem quia blanditiis sunt. Eligendi nam nemo quia incidunt doloribus quaerat. Atque et beatae cupiditate nulla aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...