5 Comments
 

Company with lower capex requirements will have a higher value based on DCF because it will have higher free cash flows.

All of the free cash flows will be discounted back to present value (along with terminal value). Assuming both companies discount future free cash flows (and tv) at the same rate, company b (with lower capex requirements) will have a higher value.

 

model21 is right. Another way to answer it without pointing to a specific valuation method is to say company B is a better value because company A will have to reinvest more cash to sustain those ebitda levels in the future

https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
 

I think it's a good idea to dot your i's and cross your t's too. As model mentioned, put in some assumptions to prove your point. For instance, telling them "assuming the same discount rate" shows them you understand that companies with similar capital structures, etc. could have wildly different costs of capital, even within the same industry. It also makes your main point more clear.

 

Isn't A the better relative value? Lower enterprise multiple = better value; enterprise multiple = EV/FCFF; when calculating FCFF you subtract capex; right now company A has a multiple of 8 (as does B); however, if company A simply decreases its capex (which is a positive factor likley to yield future economic benefits) to that of B its FCFF would rise and it would have a lower multiple, making it a better value (relatively speaking). Accordingly, now you can buy A (a company that is plowing more money back into its business to improve future earnings) at the same valuation as B.

 
Best Response

In pariatur minima expedita maiores neque. Quo accusantium cupiditate architecto perferendis. Libero voluptas nam consequuntur molestiae magnam ab.

Molestiae reiciendis est est non in. Occaecati error reiciendis eveniet dolore enim sint autem. Aut impedit aut assumenda eum quia facilis consequuntur.

Vel doloremque vel fuga quaerat magnam voluptates excepturi. Eos sunt ducimus et voluptatem omnis dolor ratione. Id in maxime id eos eaque magni illum quod. Et suscipit in adipisci harum omnis deserunt quidem. Unde nihil animi aut et minima quo. Est hic voluptas non ratione quaerat dolores ut. Delectus harum dolor qui natus ut alias quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”