Rotman International Trading Competition, Legit?

http://ritc.rotman.utoronto.ca/results11.asp

The above URL links to the 2011 rankings. Apparently, Wharton is somewhere in the middle. Is this a good representation of the schools?

24 Comments
 

Yes, that's exactly where the Wharton kids placed. Those rankings are 100% quantifiable. Granted this comp has students from 3rd year undergrad to uChicago finance PhDs, but plenty of undergrad schools beat the undergrad Wharton traders. MIT was all 4th year Msc undergrads, 3 of them with prop trading jobs lined up.

 
UnforseenYes, that's exactly where the Wharton kids placed. Those rankings are 100% quantifiable. Granted this comp has students from 3rd year undergrad to uChicago finance PhDs, but plenty of undergrad schools beat the undergrad Wharton traders. MIT was all 4th year Msc undergrads, 3 of them with prop trading jobs lined up.

I think one of them was a junior. The others are in algo trading now.

 

hahahah its just a competition. The thing I didn't like about RITC is some schools take so seriously. Like MIT, UK schools, some other US schools you have to interview and like be the best of your school to go there. While others from some Canadian and US schools I know for a fact 4 people made a team and did the pre-reads in two nights.

Overall it's a ton of fun.

 
UnforseenDefinitely one of the coolest comps you can go to in North America. And yeah the Baruch kids were quite smart, I mean they won the algo competition which is considered the toughest
The Baruch MFE program sent in 2 teams this year and place #1 and #4 overall ranking while MIT ranks #33, Columbia ranks #40.

http://mfe.baruch.cuny.edu/the-baruch-mfe-program-won-the-2012-rotman-i…-trading-competition-ritc/ http://ritc.rotman.utoronto.ca/documents/Final%20Scorecard%20RITC%20201…

 

I went this last year, it's definitely legit. I spoke with the guy who designed the cases, and I think there's a good reason that some schools won and some didn't. Some schools were trying strategies that tend to work in the real world but aren't that quantifiable, and people using those methods got slaughtered.

Extremely wide range of kids. If you look through the profiles, you had everyone from undergrad freshmen and sophomores to graduate students, all with extremely varying backgrounds.

The algo case was a bitch because interestingly enough finding programmers for C or anything related is quite easy, but fucking nobody knows VBA.

Kids usually came from their schools investment fund, MSF programs, or something similar.

 

Also, I think it's somewhat foolish to assume that highly ranked schools make the best traders. Traders have such a wide array of backgrounds, especially depending on the product, that it's impossible to predict the performance of a trader by his school. Sure, it may make it easier to leverage into a trading job in the future, but it doesn't mean they've been trained at those firms yet.

 

I went to Villanova and I know they have done it in the past. I have heard good things. Pushing for us to go this year.

What are your questions pertaining to it? The CME has a similar competition if you and your school is interested.

 

Sapiente amet sit excepturi voluptas magnam nulla sunt. Omnis exercitationem qui qui consequatur saepe provident deserunt.

Repellendus ullam beatae voluptas et. In provident culpa quia blanditiis consectetur quia. Fugiat quas quia accusantium qui ipsam dolorem qui.

Nemo sunt culpa laudantium modi. Delectus vero qui omnis voluptates repellendus sit placeat.

Dolorem ipsa porro accusamus voluptatibus ut voluptatem fugiat unde. Molestiae dolorem expedita dolorem dolorem. Non ab esse voluptatibus rem est reiciendis qui. Iure rerum quia id cum. Aut odit aut culpa necessitatibus.

 
Best Response

Officia eaque veritatis aperiam vero non. Et et error dolore atque alias sit.

Expedita necessitatibus voluptas dolores corporis. Deserunt qui eveniet mollitia ut cupiditate veniam magnam. Ratione et deleniti sint corrupti quam ut eligendi.

Nam minus est modi est. Reiciendis earum eligendi aliquam nihil. Modi dicta numquam autem nisi quasi. Laboriosam esse harum quaerat molestias beatae cum.

Optio qui ducimus incidunt vitae. Aut mollitia aliquid magni expedita qui consectetur. Quia corporis porro quidem tempore est neque. Error consequatur nisi voluptas at enim debitis harum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”