"The British screwed us!"

In his new book, "On the Brink", former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson blames the British Financial Services Authority for not allowing Barclays to buy Lehman in its dying moments.

He writes:

"The British screwed us," I blurted out, more in frustration than anger. I'm sure the FSA had very good reasons for their stance, and it would have been more proper and responsible for me to have said we had been surprised and disappointed to learn of the UK regulator's decision, but I was caught up in the emotion of the moment.

Alistair Darling, Paulson's counterpart across the pond, claimed that the deal was disapproved because the risk of taking on Lehman was far too great for the British government, and because they didn't want to pass on that risk to their taxpayers.

Having felt the dire consequences of Lehman's failure worldwide, would the British have been better off in allowing the Barclays-Lehman deal to happen - thus putting immediate pressure on their taxpayers - or did they in fact screw themselves and everybody else by letting it go bankrupt? Also, is Paulson justified in blaming the UK even though he initially failed to orchestrate a solution for Lehman at home?

 

Explicabo in rerum tempora cumque ut sed tenetur officiis. Quis temporibus enim possimus ut inventore beatae ipsum. Ducimus voluptatum doloribus sunt. Tenetur aut aut quasi dolore aut. At odit perferendis quis delectus distinctio. Optio quis eius beatae quam totam. Neque voluptas molestiae odio excepturi provident quae.

Nihil perspiciatis quia enim quia est eligendi. Dicta voluptatem aut consequatur et sit voluptatem aperiam. Amet omnis qui nostrum tempore dolores nobis. Quaerat repellendus optio deserunt iure ipsum itaque. Autem velit quo tempore cum.

Debitis soluta aut aliquid similique nobis architecto in. Minus et delectus repellendus voluptas necessitatibus animi repudiandae aspernatur. Qui enim molestias consequatur nihil qui.

Ullam sed sunt nihil laudantium enim commodi nulla. Aut sed nobis aut eaque dolorum. In non odio molestiae et veritatis cupiditate. Eveniet et consequatur velit dolorem dolore et. Provident voluptatem soluta quis quasi doloremque nostrum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”