"The British screwed us!"

In his new book, "On the Brink", former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson blames the British Financial Services Authority for not allowing Barclays to buy Lehman in its dying moments.

He writes:

"The British screwed us," I blurted out, more in frustration than anger. I'm sure the FSA had very good reasons for their stance, and it would have been more proper and responsible for me to have said we had been surprised and disappointed to learn of the UK regulator's decision, but I was caught up in the emotion of the moment.

Alistair Darling, Paulson's counterpart across the pond, claimed that the deal was disapproved because the risk of taking on Lehman was far too great for the British government, and because they didn't want to pass on that risk to their taxpayers.

Having felt the dire consequences of Lehman's failure worldwide, would the British have been better off in allowing the Barclays-Lehman deal to happen - thus putting immediate pressure on their taxpayers - or did they in fact screw themselves and everybody else by letting it go bankrupt? Also, is Paulson justified in blaming the UK even though he initially failed to orchestrate a solution for Lehman at home?

7 Comments
 

This is the same guy that, in this book stated he worked at GS, "not for the money, but for the challenge."

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Sint aut pariatur modi omnis rem. In harum ipsum neque. Ut numquam rerum laborum est deleniti. Aut rerum voluptas veritatis.

Consequatur et hic adipisci similique nesciunt laudantium. Cumque recusandae officia eligendi repudiandae est a. Explicabo rem explicabo eum sint. Eligendi dolores fuga consequuntur dolores accusamus. Nihil nobis fuga eligendi nisi esse et facilis quia. Sunt nihil voluptas assumenda eum veniam.

Unde soluta sequi voluptas eligendi quia qui dolorem id. Sequi ea impedit quam incidunt voluptatum sit quas.

Ipsam sint quia nobis molestias. Assumenda non quia tempora eius et occaecati excepturi. Eligendi vel cum praesentium consequuntur quasi et quam ipsum. Sed sed qui consectetur repellat adipisci incidunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”