What's the average discount rate for a early-stage technology company?

My bank works with very early stage companies, and I'm currently looking through some of the models and trying to understand them. WACC is calculated to be ~9% using beta derived by doing comps on capIQ. It looks like we then applied a 80% "liquidity and size" premium. This seems insanely high for me. A 89% discount rate? Is this normal when valuing early stage companies? And if so, how does one figure out how much of a premium/discount to apply?

9 Comments
 
Best Response

Honestly, it's high, but it's not as crazy as you think.

These companies are relying largely on equity, which is more expensive. And they are undeveloped, which means uncertainty, which means selling equity is expensive. Think about it: some high growth, early stage "disruptive" tech startup needs $100,000. This company has huge potential future growth, but really needs this funding. They settle on a valuation of $2mm, and the VC takes a 40% stake for his $100,000. In 9 months, the company is worth $8mm. Sucks to suck, but start-ups are an uncertain business, and nobody is going to give you a deal.

Conceptually, cost of equity = risk free rate + risk premium. Start-ups fail frequently. Early investors expect to (and are) compensated handsomely for the risk they take.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

I guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

 
arguewithatreeI guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

Yes. You'll probably want to use a multi-stage growth model, which assumes different growth rates over time. A good resource: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 
arguewithatreeI guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

Yes. You'll probably want to use a multi-stage growth model, which assumes different growth rates over time. A good resource: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

I could be wrong, but with a DCF, I believe in theory you're supposed to project the statistically most probable operating results, ie the one in the middle of the bell curve, which will factor in business specific risks. Then discount at a rate that only factors in systemic risk, ie the CAPM-derived rate. So don't factor in the failure risk. But with biotech where it's "all or nothing" this probably doesn't apply...I'm no expert so I'm also curious to hear what the WSO gurus have to say about this...

 

I don't typically work on companies in that industry so maybe it is one of those that has multiples that are crazy high, but IMO a start up company that has yet to produce anything with a 15% discount rate seems awfully low. Most companies I work on have discount rates in that range, and they have been around for decades with proven profitability and stability. Not sure what the revenue means in terms of the discount rate? Alone, it doesn't affect the discount rate.

 

Eos sunt ut officia sunt quo quia fugiat. Voluptate necessitatibus saepe corporis vel id dolorem cumque possimus. Quia reiciendis vero aliquam fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”