What's the average discount rate for a early-stage technology company?

My bank works with very early stage companies, and I'm currently looking through some of the models and trying to understand them. WACC is calculated to be ~9% using beta derived by doing comps on capIQ. It looks like we then applied a 80% "liquidity and size" premium. This seems insanely high for me. A 89% discount rate? Is this normal when valuing early stage companies? And if so, how does one figure out how much of a premium/discount to apply?

 
Best Response

Honestly, it's high, but it's not as crazy as you think.

These companies are relying largely on equity, which is more expensive. And they are undeveloped, which means uncertainty, which means selling equity is expensive. Think about it: some high growth, early stage "disruptive" tech startup needs $100,000. This company has huge potential future growth, but really needs this funding. They settle on a valuation of $2mm, and the VC takes a 40% stake for his $100,000. In 9 months, the company is worth $8mm. Sucks to suck, but start-ups are an uncertain business, and nobody is going to give you a deal.

Conceptually, cost of equity = risk free rate + risk premium. Start-ups fail frequently. Early investors expect to (and are) compensated handsomely for the risk they take.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

I guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

 
arguewithatree:
I guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

Yes. You'll probably want to use a multi-stage growth model, which assumes different growth rates over time. A good resource: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 
arguewithatree:
I guess that makes sense. I'm having trouble understanding how these valuations aren't complete bullshit still. Even with a 90% discount, enterprise value is over $60MM for a company with two years of projected negative FCF. And somehow they have managed to raise over $10MM already.

The long term growth rate also seems high/has an obviously significant affect on enterprise value. I know that for most normal companies long term growth would be around the rate GDP is growing at. Do early stage tech companies have much higher growth rates too?

Yes. You'll probably want to use a multi-stage growth model, which assumes different growth rates over time. A good resource: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

I could be wrong, but with a DCF, I believe in theory you're supposed to project the statistically most probable operating results, ie the one in the middle of the bell curve, which will factor in business specific risks. Then discount at a rate that only factors in systemic risk, ie the CAPM-derived rate. So don't factor in the failure risk. But with biotech where it's "all or nothing" this probably doesn't apply...I'm no expert so I'm also curious to hear what the WSO gurus have to say about this...

 

I don't typically work on companies in that industry so maybe it is one of those that has multiples that are crazy high, but IMO a start up company that has yet to produce anything with a 15% discount rate seems awfully low. Most companies I work on have discount rates in that range, and they have been around for decades with proven profitability and stability. Not sure what the revenue means in terms of the discount rate? Alone, it doesn't affect the discount rate.

 

Saepe et consequatur qui et vero. Laudantium temporibus modi rerum quae dolore qui explicabo. Quidem quia enim esse quibusdam.

Atque repellendus et magni error itaque. Nobis id natus repudiandae odio aut quis tenetur.

Sed aperiam exercitationem harum est aut voluptatem sapiente. Illum asperiores quia dignissimos vero atque. Unde ex itaque voluptas officia qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”