GS to Settle for $5 BILLION?

I've got nothing concrete on this, but there's a rumor Goldman is willing to cough up $5 BILLION to make the fraud case go away. That's right, kids, NINE FUCKING ZEROES. That is unbelievable. I saw it at the bottom of the Daily Short Report and I'm wondering if it's even possible. Anyone have anything on this???


Word on the street is that Goldman may settle the case against them for a whopping $5B.
Stumbling block is the regulators want them to admit the fraud, and they want the traditional cover of not-admitting or denying. Supposedly, GS says they will pay any amount, but an admission is a deal breaker. Will keep you posted.
 

I'll believe it when I see it. I still don't think the SEC has a solid case against Goldman. The Abacus deal was partially crafted by Abacus and they're also a big sophisticated investor. Expected outcomes would suggest that $5B is too much unless there's a lot more skeletons in the closet.

It's not like the reputation damage is a real threat. People still worship at the Goldman altar.

 
Victor252:
I'll believe it when I see it. I still don't think the SEC has a solid case against Goldman. The Abacus deal was partially crafted by Abacus and they're also a big sophisticated investor. Expected outcomes would suggest that $5B is too much unless there's a lot more skeletons in the closet.

It's not like the reputation damage is a real threat. People still worship at the Goldman altar.

They already have lost like 40billion, reputational damage is done. I am sure they would gladly pay $10billion 3 months ago now.

 
BCbanker:
$40Bn of fluctuation in market cap is very different than $40Bn cash outflow.

Exactly, even if Goldman was trading at a P/CF of 1, operationally, losing $5B in cash is different than the shareholders losing money.

Good point BC

Plus that MV "damage" is more likely to be caused by fear/uncertainty and shorting of the stock rather than clients and talent fleeing the company. Goldman doesn't do business with welfare sucking populist peasants. Their clients would probably be labeled as evil speculators as well (Abacus).

So I'll believe it when I see.

 

Good post Davey +1. GS's clients are big boys and have their own research departments. Market makers take the opposite side in any transaction anyway and Goldman is expected to hedge risk as a responsible corporation. If they didn't and stock holders lost money, they'd be sued for criminal negligence.

 

What reputational damage?? You can't just use the 40bn drop in market value and say that quantifies loss of reputational goodwill. They structured this deal for the client and at the behest of the client and it made the client a bucketful of money. Everyone knew by that point Paulson was maaad short MBSs, yet there were still willing buyers to go long. Market is zero-sum game, for every winner there's a loser. They should've done their due diligence and probed deeper into wtf they were investing in.

 

^^Like I said, there's a good chance that there are other skeletons in the closet but $5B is a heft price to pay for the possibility of a law suit. Last week it was supposedly a settlement deal in the hundreds of millions, now it's in the billions? Sue me for anchoring bias but I'm skeptical.

 

@CMoss

Good question. Abacus made money on that deal so I doubt there's be any compensatory damages. It would have to be punitive damages paid to the government because some SEC wannabe has a bug his butt.

I'm not a lawyer but that's my 2 cents. Anyone have an expert opinion on this?

 

Why did all the institutions sell off the stock right away when the SEC report went public? Why has the stock not rallied at all? Why have none of the big boys, Paulsen size guys said "GS" is undervalued its time to buy.

Say what you want since that SEC report, there is not once peice of proof besides Buffet keeping his shares, that shows institution have forgiven GS and bought back in. If I have a PM at a large mutual fund, and after the SEC report GS just eff'd me, I may not be buying back in so soon. That is the reputational risk I am talking about.

 

All the SEC wants to do is make it appear as if they actually have balls. If they seriously thought that deals like Abacus and Timberwolf were criminal or wrong or shitty deals or whatever, they would be hardcore investigating every single bank on the street that ever made a synthetic CDO, and being as obvious about it too. Instead they're trying to make Goldman the fall guy for everybody else with this dog-and-pony show.

 

Nisi quia officia sed non dolor deleniti. Consectetur nam quaerat voluptatibus est. Voluptatem exercitationem eveniet sit corporis. Dolorem exercitationem facilis rem quasi et odit impedit. Nobis impedit earum velit animi commodi quidem.

Voluptatem et sapiente ducimus doloribus nostrum earum. Incidunt sunt sint ut nesciunt et consequuntur voluptatem eveniet. Voluptatibus reprehenderit nam quisquam. Facere voluptas iusto et aut.

Iusto aut consequatur amet animi aspernatur velit optio. Dicta enim est animi repellat nulla et tempore nisi. Autem ut voluptatem doloremque. Est omnis maiores ut quo porro. Molestiae voluptatem eum dolor id animi dolore rem. Minus consequuntur omnis labore consequatur. Libero sint corrupti voluptas officia cupiditate.

Aut in quod beatae enim similique. Molestiae velit deserunt delectus eius molestiae quia earum. Autem cupiditate distinctio totam suscipit aliquam numquam voluptatem modi. Adipisci quis qui consequatur. Possimus eligendi voluptatem qui nam. Eos animi commodi et omnis consequatur ducimus aut.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”