GS to Settle for $5 BILLION?

I've got nothing concrete on this, but there's a rumor Goldman is willing to cough up $5 BILLION to make the fraud case go away. That's right, kids, NINE FUCKING ZEROES. That is unbelievable. I saw it at the bottom of the Daily Short Report and I'm wondering if it's even possible. Anyone have anything on this???

Word on the street is that Goldman may settle the case against them for a whopping $5B. Stumbling block is the regulators want them to admit the fraud, and they want the traditional cover of not-admitting or denying. Supposedly, GS says they will pay any amount, but an admission is a deal breaker. Will keep you posted.
20 Comments
 

I'll believe it when I see it. I still don't think the SEC has a solid case against Goldman. The Abacus deal was partially crafted by Abacus and they're also a big sophisticated investor. Expected outcomes would suggest that $5B is too much unless there's a lot more skeletons in the closet.

It's not like the reputation damage is a real threat. People still worship at the Goldman altar.

 
Victor252I'll believe it when I see it. I still don't think the SEC has a solid case against Goldman. The Abacus deal was partially crafted by Abacus and they're also a big sophisticated investor. Expected outcomes would suggest that $5B is too much unless there's a lot more skeletons in the closet.

It's not like the reputation damage is a real threat. People still worship at the Goldman altar.

They already have lost like 40billion, reputational damage is done. I am sure they would gladly pay $10billion 3 months ago now.

 
BCbanker$40Bn of fluctuation in market cap is very different than $40Bn cash outflow.

Exactly, even if Goldman was trading at a P/CF of 1, operationally, losing $5B in cash is different than the shareholders losing money.

Good point BC

Plus that MV "damage" is more likely to be caused by fear/uncertainty and shorting of the stock rather than clients and talent fleeing the company. Goldman doesn't do business with welfare sucking populist peasants. Their clients would probably be labeled as evil speculators as well (Abacus).

So I'll believe it when I see.

 

Good post Davey +1. GS's clients are big boys and have their own research departments. Market makers take the opposite side in any transaction anyway and Goldman is expected to hedge risk as a responsible corporation. If they didn't and stock holders lost money, they'd be sued for criminal negligence.

 

What reputational damage?? You can't just use the 40bn drop in market value and say that quantifies loss of reputational goodwill. They structured this deal for the client and at the behest of the client and it made the client a bucketful of money. Everyone knew by that point Paulson was maaad short MBSs, yet there were still willing buyers to go long. Market is zero-sum game, for every winner there's a loser. They should've done their due diligence and probed deeper into wtf they were investing in.

 

^^Like I said, there's a good chance that there are other skeletons in the closet but $5B is a heft price to pay for the possibility of a law suit. Last week it was supposedly a settlement deal in the hundreds of millions, now it's in the billions? Sue me for anchoring bias but I'm skeptical.

 

@CMoss

Good question. Abacus made money on that deal so I doubt there's be any compensatory damages. It would have to be punitive damages paid to the government because some SEC wannabe has a bug his butt.

I'm not a lawyer but that's my 2 cents. Anyone have an expert opinion on this?

 

Why did all the institutions sell off the stock right away when the SEC report went public? Why has the stock not rallied at all? Why have none of the big boys, Paulsen size guys said "GS" is undervalued its time to buy.

Say what you want since that SEC report, there is not once peice of proof besides Buffet keeping his shares, that shows institution have forgiven GS and bought back in. If I have a PM at a large mutual fund, and after the SEC report GS just eff'd me, I may not be buying back in so soon. That is the reputational risk I am talking about.

 

All the SEC wants to do is make it appear as if they actually have balls. If they seriously thought that deals like Abacus and Timberwolf were criminal or wrong or shitty deals or whatever, they would be hardcore investigating every single bank on the street that ever made a synthetic CDO, and being as obvious about it too. Instead they're trying to make Goldman the fall guy for everybody else with this dog-and-pony show.

 

In dolore dicta rerum nulla quos nulla iusto architecto. Id deleniti voluptatem ducimus praesentium.

Impedit eius quia voluptates sed autem dolorum. Facilis optio et nihil mollitia quo dolor. Excepturi voluptatum inventore quos et ab sed nesciunt. Rerum ut dolores praesentium sit et occaecati et. Iure eveniet quia voluptas necessitatibus nobis tempora porro voluptatem.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”