Very interesting....will try to read more about why some consider it not applicable in this case, although I can see why. We are in a unique place right now, not a good one but not a bad one (yet) either. Will be interesting to see if this holds true. Hopefully not.
"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
Very interesting....will try to read more about why some consider it not applicable in this case, although I can see why.
Theory of Relativity. In this case, bonds and alternative assets relative to stocks.
So, in this case, you're saying that due to the performance we're seeing from alternative categories at this point in time, this 24.xx level isn't relatively dangerous right now?
"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
It'll be useful for calling tops (bottoms) when everyone thinks it's useful for calling tops (bottoms). Because that's when everyone will react to it, creating the top (bottom) in itself.
Asness wrote it shouldn't be used as a tactical trading tool, but as a tool to use for structuring your portfolio going forward. I think there's a lot of evidence to support the predictive power of the Shiller P/E.
Difficult to look at indicators like Shiller CAPE, Citi economic surprise index, etc. (even company earnings), when central banks are using unprecedented policy worldwide..making common alternatives to equities unattractive.
What happens when you do actually take in to account Shiller's P/E assumptions? What are these assumptions? Is looking at track records like this not a dangerous game anyway. I still don't fully understand the role of these tools in decision making.
I was talking to a trader who uses purely technical analysis recently and the main reason for this seemed to be that a lot of these tools and statistics have self-fulfilling properties, as ytinifni said. Does this work of fundamentals or rely purely on market trends?
Concluding it's usefulness with respect to history and track record seems to be a bad way to look at it, no?
Est ut fugiat omnis. Et expedita nisi eaque beatae earum nesciunt atque. Accusantium et minus asperiores eligendi nisi est. Nobis autem et debitis ut. Temporibus rerum debitis a non dolorem quis porro.
Eos alias blanditiis pariatur ex cumque. Aut dolor accusamus incidunt reprehenderit rerum iure recusandae. Eum ea aperiam numquam laudantium sapiente dolorum. Voluptatem tempora molestias a sit omnis aliquid officiis. Ea atque fugiat numquam eum esse quibusdam.
Provident eos culpa et pariatur distinctio ut maiores. Esse qui id nam dolor qui in quibusdam. Esse et quasi exercitationem. Voluptas quam quia ut molestiae aut. Sit optio tempore minus quo omnis fuga esse. Quos delectus maiores vel nulla.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
interesting post. thanks for sharing!
Very interesting....will try to read more about why some consider it not applicable in this case, although I can see why. We are in a unique place right now, not a good one but not a bad one (yet) either. Will be interesting to see if this holds true. Hopefully not.
Theory of Relativity. In this case, bonds and alternative assets relative to stocks.
So, in this case, you're saying that due to the performance we're seeing from alternative categories at this point in time, this 24.xx level isn't relatively dangerous right now?
It'll be useful for calling tops (bottoms) when everyone thinks it's useful for calling tops (bottoms). Because that's when everyone will react to it, creating the top (bottom) in itself.
Asness wrote it shouldn't be used as a tactical trading tool, but as a tool to use for structuring your portfolio going forward. I think there's a lot of evidence to support the predictive power of the Shiller P/E.
Difficult to look at indicators like Shiller CAPE, Citi economic surprise index, etc. (even company earnings), when central banks are using unprecedented policy worldwide..making common alternatives to equities unattractive.
What happens when you do actually take in to account Shiller's P/E assumptions? What are these assumptions? Is looking at track records like this not a dangerous game anyway. I still don't fully understand the role of these tools in decision making.
I was talking to a trader who uses purely technical analysis recently and the main reason for this seemed to be that a lot of these tools and statistics have self-fulfilling properties, as ytinifni said. Does this work of fundamentals or rely purely on market trends?
Concluding it's usefulness with respect to history and track record seems to be a bad way to look at it, no?
Est ut fugiat omnis. Et expedita nisi eaque beatae earum nesciunt atque. Accusantium et minus asperiores eligendi nisi est. Nobis autem et debitis ut. Temporibus rerum debitis a non dolorem quis porro.
Eos alias blanditiis pariatur ex cumque. Aut dolor accusamus incidunt reprehenderit rerum iure recusandae. Eum ea aperiam numquam laudantium sapiente dolorum. Voluptatem tempora molestias a sit omnis aliquid officiis. Ea atque fugiat numquam eum esse quibusdam.
Provident eos culpa et pariatur distinctio ut maiores. Esse qui id nam dolor qui in quibusdam. Esse et quasi exercitationem. Voluptas quam quia ut molestiae aut. Sit optio tempore minus quo omnis fuga esse. Quos delectus maiores vel nulla.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...