Buy-Side vs M&A straight out of undergrad

Buy-side (i.e. PE or Real Estate PE at BB firm) vs. M&A at BB straight out of undergrad (at analyst level)

Which do people think has the greater/better:
1) Prestige
2) Exit options
3) Compensation & work life balance
4) Overall package

Thanks!

 

Really? From what I understand BBs hire in very few people straight from undergrad into their private equity divisions. At my college only a few of the very top students got (and accepted) offers from BB private equity divisions.

I would say its more selective and prestigious than M&A which is far easier to get into straight from college. Exit options should be good as well as you've actually get buy-side experience.

 
Best Response

I would take BB M&A. I know it's hard to resist taking a PE job right now, down the road I think it'll be worth it.

Reasons:

  1. Deal Flow: Probably the most important reason. Most of your learning comes from doing a lot of reps on a model, offering materials, etc. You'll find this more at a M&A/CorpFin rather than PE.

  2. Training: BBs invest a crap load of time and money into analyst, and you can easily see the difference between analysts from lateraled from BBs with decent training and ones form boutqiues who had just "on-site" training.

  3. Network: During analyst training, since it's a bigger pool, you'll develop a larger network of friends and contacts in CorpFin vs. PE right out of the gates.

 
b0088:
Just to clarify, the offer to do PE/Real Estate PE is with a bulge bracket.

The deal flow would not be the same as M&A - i.e. do fewer+smaller deals but you would get the same training and networking opportunities as you are in a BB.

I would jump at it, working in P.E. straight out of UG is an unbelievable opportunity. I have a friend who is working for GS's P.E. division straight out of UG. He's having a great time and the hours are not that rough for obvious reasons.

People overestimate the experience you get in M&A even at a BB.

I really wish I was in your position because I really want to do Real Estate PE anywhere regardless of size of the bank.

 

This is a very high level and interesting thread.

It gets back to a similar question I posed here (which no one answered cause you guys are all bankers).

I had the same dilimea, sell side research or an undergrad analyst position at a buy side firm (a top kind of firm, with 200+ Bil AUM).

Everyone in the business said, go buyside if you can. Sure you get some networking and training, but who cares, if you can start at where everyone wants to go, why do you care? You are already at the best, and you can stay there, should you do well, as long as you want.

If you get a training program to boot (as I would at a BB equivelenet IM firm), then you'd be a fool to turn it down.

 

if you are in a top group (aka high dealflow) and you are good then you'll be closing deals and not pitch all the time. a good analyst in top group should be able to close 3-5 deals in a 2 year period. THAT will set you for any exit you may want. Its deal experience that matters the most. From what i've seen BB PE do a lot of minority equity investments and very rare proper buyouts. Even if they do buyouts, you might be lucky to do 1, but I think thats not enough.

 
wamartinu:
if you are in a top group (aka high dealflow) and you are good then you'll be closing deals and not pitch all the time. a good analyst in top group should be able to close 3-5 deals in a 2 year period. THAT will set you for any exit you may want. Its deal experience that matters the most. From what i've seen BB PE do a lot of minority equity investments and very rare proper buyouts. Even if they do buyouts, you might be lucky to do 1, but I think thats not enough.

In terms of deal experience, in a BB PE group if the buy side deal dies in the last round, all the learning is already compeleted. All the due diligence is done, offer letter etc, the only part missing is admin process after the deal is done. Also monitoring existing portfolio companies is a very useful learning exprience, kind of like consulting type work.

In conclusion, although the number of deals you do is less, the experience/learning curve should be steeper in my opinion... please correct me if i am wrong?? would appreciate some input from professionals in the industry on this

 
wkc207:
wamartinu:
if you are in a top group (aka high dealflow) and you are good then you'll be closing deals and not pitch all the time. a good analyst in top group should be able to close 3-5 deals in a 2 year period. THAT will set you for any exit you may want. Its deal experience that matters the most. From what i've seen BB PE do a lot of minority equity investments and very rare proper buyouts. Even if they do buyouts, you might be lucky to do 1, but I think thats not enough.

In terms of deal experience, in a BB PE group if the buy side deal dies in the last round, all the learning is already compeleted. All the due diligence is done, offer letter etc, the only part missing is admin process after the deal is done. Also monitoring existing portfolio companies is a very useful learning exprience, kind of like consulting type work.

In conclusion, although the number of deals you do is less, the experience/learning curve should be steeper in my opinion... please correct me if i am wrong?? would appreciate some input from professionals in the industry on this

correct. but thats the same thing you could say about IBD. You can close 3-5 transactions and have an extra 3-5 that didnt close but you still got the experience. In terms of GS PIA vs. IBD, again I would choose primarily on fit, number of deals, number of people (how big is the PIA team?) I know that in Europe, the best group to join at GS is Healthcare. They have by far the best dealflow. And to be honest, PIA in Europe is not that active, the do a bunch of small transaction and equity/debt investments. PIA in NY I think has better dealflow.

 

buyside if you want to make it your long-term goal; for all the talk about the sell-side being a better learning exp due to deal volume, there is no better way to have relevant buyside exp than to work on the buyside. crossing over from buyside to sellside (if you ever have a change of heart, this rarely happens) is a bit easier than sellside to buyside, I think

 

PE right now. I agree that there are benefits to doing M&A first. However, your ultimate goal is probably to land a buyside job. There are no guarantees that you can land a PE gig in two years. Take the bird in hand. It would fucking suck to turn down the PE job now and never get this opportunity again.

 
Buyside <span class=keyword_link><a href=https://www.e-junkie.com/ecom/gb.php?ii=1145861&amp;c=cart&amp;aff=44880&amp;ejc=2&amp;cl=175031 rel=nofollow>CFA</a></span>:
PE right now. I agree that there are benefits to doing M&A first. However, your ultimate goal is probably to land a buyside job. There are no guarantees that you can land a PE gig in two years. Take the bird in hand. It would fucking suck to turn down the PE job now and never get this opportunity again.

what if i dont know/ not clear on what the ultimate goal is.... whats better for the long term, lets say i quit finance all together and go to corporates/ start my own thing?

BB PE analyst gig straight out of undergrad seems more unique than BB IBD gig

 

Rerum dolor ipsa voluptatem beatae sit temporibus et. Asperiores voluptatem reiciendis suscipit omnis voluptatem architecto qui. Error optio et molestias.

Ratione temporibus est adipisci velit. Pariatur nam incidunt ea vel et et. Alias possimus neque dicta libero. Dolores quo ex voluptas cumque commodi qui. Consequatur necessitatibus porro non repellat corrupti maiores ullam.

Accusamus rerum distinctio adipisci et maiores. Dolor et et veritatis accusantium omnis.

Recusandae fugit rerum dignissimos sit. Assumenda nemo temporibus eos et suscipit in doloribus veniam. Voluptatem non soluta rem officiis veniam aut. Nostrum suscipit aspernatur accusamus dolores sit numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”