Morgan Stanley S&T vs. Citigroup S&T (Offer Help)
(Senior Chimp, 25
Points)
on 2/28/12 at 2:36am
I have never posted on this site, or had a log until today for that matter. But I have read the posts and wanted to get none BS opinions from people on MS Institutional Equity S&T vs. Citi S&T and QA analysis programs.
Both are SA positions and I have an offer from both. I liked the people at both places but Citi would give more diversity in terms of FI and Equity desk rotations vs. MS being equity only, but it seems that MS has the better general rep.
Thanks for the opinions!





PM me
PM me
I'd go with Citi
I'd go with Citi
^^^ agreed
^^^ agreed
Gambler Daily
The opportunity to "try
The opportunity to "try before you buy" so to speak is incredibly valuable - you may find Equities are just not your thing.
Sometimes I feel that some
Sometimes I feel that some answers in this forum are directed to actually choosing the worse possible one. How could Citi S&T is better than MS S&T?? Last year MS posted a record high $1.7bn in equity sales and trading revenue1, its highest figure in that business since 2008. On top of it, by Q4 2011, MS did less to cut down on pay than Citi. Citi did lots of bloodshed for cost-cutting its insane. I would go with MS. Especially knowing MS is the underwriter for Facebook IPO for crying out loud.
FunFundedFund
Sometimes I feel that some answers in this forum are directed to actually choosing the worse possible one. How could Citi S&T is better than MS S&T?? Last year MS posted a record high $1.7bn in equity sales and trading revenue1, its highest figure in that business since 2008. On top of it, by Q4 2011, MS did less to cut down on pay than Citi. Citi did lots of bloodshed for cost-cutting its insane. I would go with MS. Especially knowing MS is the underwriter for Facebook IPO for crying out loud.
Could you please do us all a favor and stop posting?
-thanks
@ OP, you mentioned QA in your original post. Just to clarify, the SA at Citi is for sales & trading, not quantitative analysis, right? SAs in QA are placed in research for the summer, but will do rotations in both trading and research once they start fulltime.
FreezePops
Sometimes I feel that some answers in this forum are directed to actually choosing the worse possible one. How could Citi S&T is better than MS S&T?? Last year MS posted a record high $1.7bn in equity sales and trading revenue1, its highest figure in that business since 2008. On top of it, by Q4 2011, MS did less to cut down on pay than Citi. Citi did lots of bloodshed for cost-cutting its insane. I would go with MS. Especially knowing MS is the underwriter for Facebook IPO for crying out loud.
Could you please do us all a favor and stop posting?
-thanks
@ OP, you mentioned QA in your original post. Just to clarify, the SA at Citi is for sales & trading, not quantitative analysis, right? SAs in QA are placed in research for the summer, but will do rotations in both trading and research once they start fulltime.
Just to please you?
NEVER :)
NewGuy and gekko, why do you
NewGuy and gekko, why do you guys think Citi.... and for clarification both are S&T QA is just a part of citi's program name.
Because Equities sucks and is
Because Equities sucks and is boring as hell, and because Citi is a FICC powerhouse. NO ONE who works in S&T will ask you to choose MS over Citi. The guys saying Citi in this thread are the more informed posters.
As for Citi, make sure you stay on the S&T track and not QA (unless hardcore quantitative analysis excites you).
The numbers, NewGuy, speak
The numbers, NewGuy, speak louder than words.
FunFundedFund
Sometimes I feel that some answers in this forum are directed to actually choosing the worse possible one. How could Citi S&T is better than MS S&T?? Last year MS posted a record high $1.7bn in equity sales and trading revenue1, its highest figure in that business since 2008. On top of it, by Q4 2011, MS did less to cut down on pay than Citi. Citi did lots of bloodshed for cost-cutting its insane. I would go with MS. Especially knowing MS is the underwriter for Facebook IPO for crying out loud.
Citi without a doubt.
Citi has a great culture and the ability to do a rotational program is the biggest benefit. They have a 3 desk rotation for this summer intern class and will give you a great ability to find what you want to do. Yes MS is great at equities but what if you do not like it? Citi is great at FICC but sucks at equities.
Don't enlistee to this jackass. Who gives a fuck about underwriter for facebook IPO when your in S&T? That is a classic getting caught up in a name. I believe it was MS who capped cash bonuses this year at 125 and not Citi.
Last point, your goal as an intern is to get a fulltime offer. No place gives you a better shot at that than Citi. They have been at the top in terms of offer rate in S&T to interns. Last year they had a 90% offer rate to anaylst interns.
PM me if you have more direct questions about Citi
Wu_banga wrote: NewGuy and
NewGuy and gekko, why do you guys think Citi.... and for clarification both are S&T QA is just a part of citi's program name.
QA and S&T are two separate tracks within S&T at Citi. QA is not S&T. There is no chance of being placed in sales if you are in the quantitative analysis track.
If you're in quantitative analysis, you will not be on a trading desk over the summer. Once you get to full time, you will have rotations both in trading and research and ultimately be placed in one of those areas.
If you're in the S&T track, you may have rotations in both Sales and Trading.
Which one you're in makes a pretty big difference.
Is Potty-Mouth part of Citi's
Is Potty-Mouth part of Citi's culture? Sounds like it. Any representatives of Citi such as FreezePops, NewGuy, and NYguy07 exhibit characteristics of pirates than bankers.
Thanks for revealing that to the ones who are trying to figure out your culture.
To OP: it seems you need to learn more on the Facebook IPO, and perhaps read more news about both companies before you decide. Bonds are safe and less risky than equity, which makes it, in my opinion, more boring. Either way, your decision.
FreezePops wrote: Wu_banga
NewGuy and gekko, why do you guys think Citi.... and for clarification both are S&T QA is just a part of citi's program name.
QA and S&T are two separate tracks within S&T at Citi. QA is not S&T. There is no chance of being placed in sales if you are in the quantitative analysis track.
If you're in quantitative analysis, you will not be on a trading desk over the summer. Once you get to full time, you will have rotations both in trading and research and ultimately be placed in one of those areas.
If you're in the S&T track, you may have rotations in both Sales and Trading.
Which one you're in makes a pretty big difference.
Agreed. I assume OP is referring to S&T. At Citi the program is called S,T & QA and they are two different tracks. I am not familiar with how the QA part works except that it is not part of the S&T rotation
2011 pay is irrelevant to a
2011 pay is irrelevant to a SA.
dabanobo wrote: 2011 pay is
Fundamental analysis, people.
FunFundedFund wrote: Bonds
bearflatten
Agreed. FunFundedFund is a
Not to derail the topic, but
turk1 wrote: Not to derail
Do not feed the trolls
I've been on both floors
I appreciate the feedback
Maximus Decimus Meridius
NewGuy wrote: Maximus
Maximus Decimus Meridius
this is crude but is my
IVY for Life
I know Citi has a higher
Spectro wrote: I know Citi
NewGuy wrote: Just my
Maximus Decimus Meridius
Maximus Decimus Meridius
NewGuy wrote: Maximus
leveRAGE. wrote: NewGuy
with regards to your first
leveRAGE. wrote: with regards
NewGuy wrote: leveRAGE.
Bernankey wrote: NewGuy
leveRAGE. wrote: Bernankey
Bernankey wrote: NewGuy
your comments are
why do these threads always
Look, I have no interest in
lolgpa wrote: turk1
Wu_banga wrote: why do these
leveRAGE. wrote: your
It's worth noting that most
Reality wrote: It's worth