Ugh frustrating GPA rounding on resume question
CGPA: 3.86
Major GPA: 3.96
How would you round this on your resume?
At first I was thinking "cGPA: 3.9/4.0, major GPA: 4.0/4.0" but then I realized it would be a bit deceptive since I didn't really get a perfect major GPA.
But if I do "cGPA: 3.9/4.0, major GPA: 3.96/4.00" people might ask, why did you use different significant digits? Are you an idiot?
Should I just list out 3.86/4.00, 3.96/4.00? A 3.9/4.0 looks so much sexier than a 3.86/4.00 though...
This guy never goes away huh?
3.86
whatever you want to put it really does not matter... either way you are a nerd
no one cares. just put it to the hundredth.
GPA: 3.9 Major GPA: 4.0
No one got dinged from a few hundreths of a point. Ask Scott Morris if you don't believe me.
Its commonly known that you should go out to the millionth place.
You've got to be the most indecisive retard that's posted on here lately. You will not make it in banking if you can't resolve a simple rounding problem on your own.
I make no apologies for being blunt.
It doesn't friggin matter, that GPA is great anyway and rounding it won't make one damn difference
Round them both to 3.9
rounding to a 4.0 is bullshit
Don't round to 4.0 unless you want to look like a dumbass when they see your transcript. Personally, I'd just list "GPA: 3.9/4.0" and be done with it--there's no need to list a major GPA when you've got a 3.9 cumulative.
Excellent advice.
This is the first post I've read here that actually pissed me off. Clearly with a 3.9 cgpa you're smart enough to figure out this ridiculous issue on your own. Wah Wah Wah I don't want to round to 3.9 and then leave 3.96 and risk the question of why are you using different decimals? Are you fucking serious? This post is clearly to flaunt your plump GPA. The "Ugh, I didn't get the job with my 3.86 because there was another applicant with a 3.861... I knew I should've rounded up!" story, doesn't exist.
LOL u mad? Poor baby is jelly of my GPA.
I ended up rounding to 3.9 and 4.0, just FYI.
This nub is clearly jelly.
Duke, you obviously tried really hard for a 4.0 and failed. TRIED AND FAILED 3.96 clearly highlights that. If you had like a 3.66, they'd be like alright, this kid isn't really shooting for a 4.0, but he still does very well, but the 3.96? this is gonna be the fucker that will choke under pressure and bring the entire project down. No matter how hard he tries, he just can't help coming short.
Lmao. Agreed
I have a 3.67 cumulative at a semi-target school. I know a popular cut-off between good and outstanding is a 3.7. I think it's appropriate for me to round to 3.7, but would like to hear advice given the fact that a) im from a semi-target b) 3.7 is a cut-off, and c) im only 3 hundreths away.
Ipsa officia reiciendis maxime laborum officiis. Omnis impedit assumenda corrupti qui enim. Aspernatur saepe aut et sint saepe debitis consequatur.
Perferendis est doloremque veritatis laudantium unde beatae. Officiis aliquid sit iure placeat. Molestiae omnis nihil veniam dolor. Quia ut qui odio distinctio et. Necessitatibus ut est quis quia omnis voluptatem harum. Minus minus veritatis maiores sunt.
Quae cumque sit culpa aut non corrupti qui. Esse quis aliquam aut dolore ducimus quia tempora molestiae. Doloribus vero quisquam quae aut culpa veniam.
Reiciendis ad nihil possimus. Labore est enim quasi ex et voluptatem. Omnis veniam et vel. Ullam aut assumenda modi et quis harum ea. Nihil tempora ipsa qui consequuntur consectetur ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...