Funniest

Awaiting incoming intern responses

"Think my return offer is ok if the bank goes bankrupt?"

 

That was mostly due to the disturbance of the ALM equilibrium on the balance sheet's of many institutions that are highly exposed to interest-rate risk, and who have a lot of ALM to do (pension funds, etc). So it can be argued that it was systemic . The issue with CS relates only to CS. of course if it does go under, which is very possible, the whole system will be at risk, thus seeing a transition from idiosyncratic to full on systemic risk, but fundamentally, the issues that they're facing are due to their own missteps rather than some systemic issue imo.

ps: this is just an opinion, and far from being fact

 

That is an interesting discussion.  Agree with the Twittwr comment (Wolf of 54th St or something) who said you shouldn’t expect the same risk level this time around.  The tools used in 2008 were considered extreme at the time, which is why they weren’t always used (i.e. save Bear but not Lehman, do QE but only after debating it forever, etc). 

Central banks and legislatures much more ready to act these days.  It’s bad for the long term because it lulls big business and especially banks into irresponsible decisions.  But it does reduce the risk of a default in the near term.

Could be as simple as Fed slowing rate hikes.  Of course now it may look like they’re doing it in response to these kinds of concerns, so they may put ego/signaling first and keep hiking to show they mean business.  

 

credit suisse

Definitely not the kind of stuff that the CEO of a bank with strong liquidity would say.

Very strong Lehman early September '08 vibe.

Markets are also sensing that something is wrong with CS: share price down 56% YTD, CDS surging to '08 credit crunch level, multiple credit rating downgrades this year, senior executives recently leaving (McCarthy, Welter), etc.

If I were at CS right now, I would be looking for a way out ASAP before things get very ugly.

 

I'm at CS.  I'm working on a fairly large megadeal and everything went radio silent mid week through this weekend with my MDs (we have some senior bank people on this deal).  Very weird with how much work we had going on and future deadlines.

Seems like leadership is busy with something else.

Might be a coincidence, but definitely feels odd.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

How did other firms compare pre-2008 in CDS? Would love to see that data.

 

October 3 Updates

Markets recently closed in Europe.

CS 5Y CDS now at 335 bps and CS 1Y CDS exploded today:

cds 5y

cds 1y

Shitibank says CS is not Lehman though:

citi

 

With where their CDS is trading right now I think it would be tough to say the least. 

 

What led to this?  Just the BOE move?  I was just scrolling through Twitter a few days ago and it mostly about UK drama and all of a sudden it's on CS.

 

CS has been in the dumpster for at least the last year.. huge leadership changes, multiple strategic reviews, key dealmakers moving elsewhere, and stock down massively. Strategic review due out the end of this month too. In short, not one specific trigger but a slow avalanche of problems.

Think the story only got "dire" over the weekend because the CEO make some comments that were taken a bit out of context and became a Twitter meme. IMO pretty unlikely CS actually goes down - probably will be some rescue financing or large restructuring.

 

We're hiking into deflation. This is NO evidence of current inflation still persisting just lagging data points spinned for sensationalism. Powell needs to put the brakes on NOW he is out of his damn mind frankly. Anyone thinking otherwise has a very skewed perception of the true risk of "inflation" versus global economic collapse.

 

Parroting Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel's take. Siegel thinks inflation has already peaked based on leading indicators, what these indicators are I'm not entirely sure. Even if inflation peaked, going from over 9% down to 8% is hardly a victory. Most talking heads calling for the fed to stop the rate hikes have a lot to gain (Elon, Kathy Wood).

 

I would speculate what’s going on is a major sale of one of their business (ie an outright sale of its IB practice).

They are not in a good spot but seems like it’s more of a failing company than a total collapse like Lehman. Divestitures seem like a logical next step.

 

The advisory business won’t be an attractive asset given the fact that a lot of their advisory work is with sponsors and if they are, I guess simply put, not able to lend to them (understand it’s more complex), then why would they get the same mandates? Jefferies will just take more of the deals they would bake off for. 

 

If you’re a junior at CS, look to lateral asap. Tbh I’d even trade down for a strong MM gig. Family friend is a VP there and expects huge cuts to the US IB practice … 30%+

 

Not sure why this is getting downvoted…This person is giving a practical outlook. I know none of the college juniors here would ever dare to work at a MM bank but you need to consider general outlook of the bank you want to work for, that goes for any corporation. 

 

there are no credible financial reporters.

oh, you are waiting for someone like Andrew "I have a man crush on Jamie Dimon" Sorkin to opine?  

Most of those guys are corrupted and won't report real negative news lest they lose their contacts.

 

Seems like it’s just one guy that tweeted out some bogus rumor that didn’t even name CS specifically. 

 

theres an emergency fed meeting monday

vatican has moved all their swiss banks funds to vatican controlled banks by sept 30th

more rumors a CS rx starts Monday

40% of the russell2000 companies are unprofitable

money velocity is at an alltime low

 

The Fed meeting today was about as run of the mill as it gets. "Expedited procedures" meetings happen every two - four weeks or so. 

 

Per financial times today 

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/6104a699-fa7f-4a81-9c35-a9a2f8ff92d2

"Credit Suisse team leaders are said to have been working the phones all weekend to reassure customers, counterparties and investors on capital and liquidity, as well as to reiterate that restructuring plans are on course."

Sounds like Dick Fulds final moments 

 

Can’t divulge too much on this but heard there are some funds that CS is dodging speaking with a bit. Unless those calls happened this weekend, I have a friend at a notable credit fund who said CS is trying to leave them in the dark. 

 

A lot of this looks more like people wanting to believe they're in the Big Short and can sense the coming earthquake instead of any reasonable logic. If you're at CS you should definitely be more worried about them exiting your business or MD's leaving than a bail-out due to collapse.   

 
horn95

A lot of this looks more like people wanting to believe they're in the Big Short and can sense the coming earthquake instead of any reasonable logic. If you're at CS you should definitely be more worried about them exiting your business or MD's leaving than a bail-out due to collapse.   

My thoughts exactly. Everyone likes a good drama storm but to be honest I think the big risk right now if I had to pick a bank that could be in trouble, I'd say DB or Commerzbank if they have exposure to Uniper or others affected by skyrocketing energy prices in Europe. CS is going to have a government backstop from Switzerland. Whether or not that's a good thing or ethical thing is another debate entirely, but it's going to happen.

 

My knowledge of CDS is limited so can someone educate on why a 250bps pricing level is noteworthy other than it being a sudden rise and close to GFC levels? If there was a genuine concern of default would it not be shooting far beyond this level? As a tweet notes in the FT article linked above, CS CDS is at same level as General Motors and c.100-150bps over its peers?

 

From my limited understanding: CDS trade above stress levels of GFC and markets give them a decent % chance of a default within the next 5y.

The letter of the CEO to calm the shit down, was called as lousy at best and market participants are not happy at all.

The low share price makes it harder to raise capital, which they might need (various scandals prior to the situation, it’s ugly). So if people loose trust into them, their assets are most likely getting downgraded /re valued, which makes it harder to cover for potential credit risks and this is then reflected in the CDS as well.

 

Deep down we all wants investment banks to fail because we all hate banking 

 

Senior Credit Suisse executives spent the weekend reassuring large clients, counterparties and investors about the Swiss bank’s liquidity and capital position in response to concerns raised about its financial strength.

Executives hit the phones after spreads on the bank’s credit default swaps, which offer protection against a company defaulting, rose sharply on Friday, indicating investor worries over the bank’s financial health.

 

To all incoming CS analysts.

Stop panicking. Just wait and see what happens. Even if you lose your job, you'll get a great life lesson. Your ex-CEO lost his job only a week after his chairman and board publically announced they were supporting him. Is he devastated? Maybe. But he's still surviving!

Never trust what senior management says. In fact, interpret it entirely the opposite way.

 

Gorman might want the wealth management / PB piece, especially at a heavy discount. Probably won't take their IB piece (much more cost-effective for a bank like MS to just poach their best ppl with huge sign-ons which are unlikely to be too high these days given the market). If you were a bank like Capital One or Truist without a well established non-MM ib franchise it might make sense to buy the CS IB franchise wholesale. But for an MS / GS / JPM, the CS IB franchise is value dilutive.

 

If they do this, wouldn’t it make more sense to go ahead with a full sale of the IB platform incl. EMEA and Asia? Maybe retaining DACH activities to support their Swiss client base.

The issue is that buyer universe would be quite limited I guess. I’m not a bank expert but I suspect you’d need a Western bank with broad shoulders but sub-scale global IB operations. Maybe someone like BNPP, SocGen or UniCredit in Europe / RBC or TD in North America. And I can’t even fathom what a nightmare the integration would be

 

Easy to see the eye catching statement that the spread matches that during the financial crisis, but 250bps is hardly at a level of high risk of default though. Leh at 750 area leading up to '09...now that's distress. 

Chances are things will probably continue to worsen but we have some time before anyone needs to panic.  

 

I heard the entire tech group is gone and no filled with bunch of new MDs from much lower tier banks

 

Those were MDs that left months back and just wrapped up their garden leave

 

2nd year MBA (disregard my WSO title, not updated) who interned at CS last summer. For what it's worth, we just got a notification from university career services about CS's upcoming info sessions and coffee chats, i.e. they're still hiring. Take that for what it's worth.

I'm not quite panicking, yet, but safe to say I'm monitoring this situation closely.

 

Hiring a couple of summer associates doesn’t really mean much…not sure that would calm investors. 

 

Maybe if they expect a Swiss government bailout, which could send CS shares up. Kodak went up like 10x after getting government funding for making a vaccine, and it was a failing company.

 

I’ve been thinking about LEAPs. Need to do more research but assuming they somewhat fix the IB group, and the other parts of the biz do just OK, the stock should pop up once bankruptcy/solvency/other concerns dissipate.

LEAPs would keep exposure low while keeping the upside high.

 

How does this affect other investment banks? does it affect other financial institutions - PE etc?

 

People want it to be like last time. The cold reality is there were only 13 recessions last century and 3 so far this one. That’s not a lot of data points to base a “science” off of. Each situation is unique. This isn’t Volcker rates or even close. We had 20%+ unemployment and people kept paying their bills. They just overshot a bit, but it is way better than the alternative. Additionally, it turns out Xi seems to be a bit of an idiot and it takes time to unwind trade dependency with said idiot. Or China can go back to what got them here: more openness and free markets, not Mao 2.0. Same with Pootin. He’s like 5’4” and wears lifts.

 

Thanks for the history lesson. Please go back to WFH, we'll take it from here.

 

Well that's it then. Cs bros, expect your key cards to not work in the morning

 

What class was this and how did the discussion come up and how long did she actually talk for? I’ve def dealt with those type of ppl in my classes before

 

The comment got deleted. It was in Econ lab - we're doing a group project about inflation, rates, and the general market going to shit and she just brought it up.

"By the way, did you see what happened to Credit Suisse?!" and then the hell began. She rambled for like 15 minutes citing that they had layoffs and other very generic shit. I asked her: "What do you think about CS' CDS?" She replies "What does CDS mean?"

Eye-roll

 

saying you are at a top group at CS is like saying you are the best crewmember on the titanic

 

For what it's worth, spoke to 2 people in coverage groups and they said MDs / clients aren't worried and they're still winning mandates. They only see layoffs in Trading, ECM/DCM and LevFin + 10% layoff like GS which shouldn't affect incoming or first years

 

For what it's worth, spoke to 2 people in coverage groups and they said MDs / clients aren't worried and they're still winning mandates. They only see layoffs in Trading, ECM/DCM and LevFin + 10% layoff like GS which shouldn't affect incoming or first years

Those same 2 people are actively spamming their resume everywhere and dreaming of being employed by KeyBanc in Cleveland instead of laid off in NYC finding a lateral spot

 

Delusional.  CS has said on record they are considering a divestment of the US advisory business, perhaps as early as this month.

Ask someone older what happens when another bank buys a a divested advisory business (it's not pretty for the target employees).

 
Ion26

Who would be a advising CS on asset sales and restructuring?

probably an investment bank with a FIG group. not 100% sure though - might need a new thread for that topic

 

Sed nihil deserunt quasi necessitatibus non eius. Perspiciatis aliquam repellendus et eum reiciendis. Voluptatem ut est est vel adipisci. Omnis unde error eaque ut animi dicta. Omnis porro aliquid sed eos consequatur repellendus.

Voluptas dignissimos iusto dolor quisquam qui quisquam et molestias. Sed magnam voluptatem ea consequatur dolor. Ut maxime nulla quae odio.

Iusto est reprehenderit enim voluptas ut cum tempora. Quae consectetur et ad nostrum hic.

 

Itaque qui explicabo tenetur temporibus minus exercitationem sapiente aspernatur. Asperiores rem ipsum nam facere ut et asperiores. Aspernatur quo dolorem nostrum iure quidem consectetur sunt. Harum tenetur consequatur rerum aut labore beatae.

Aut quis placeat eligendi numquam nihil perferendis corporis culpa. Facilis sunt nemo laudantium autem possimus aperiam.

Nobis est nisi repellendus voluptatum molestias repellendus. Officiis esse enim placeat consequuntur. Sit accusantium ab perferendis.

 

At sed ipsam molestiae occaecati. Sunt fuga quos et temporibus ut. Non nemo quibusdam molestiae et. Perferendis ullam rerum porro error ducimus.

Mollitia accusamus non minus modi numquam. Vel odio est vel dolorem dolorem adipisci voluptatum. Officia vitae atque rem. Molestiae dolore aliquid aperiam tenetur et aut nam. Quaerat modi facilis consequatur aliquam aspernatur.

Sint rerum voluptates aut aut voluptates quasi voluptas debitis. Quaerat praesentium eveniet repellendus quis totam. Quo ullam voluptas ad ut. Sed veritatis ut expedita cum. Rem provident nobis sunt id tenetur. Sed accusamus et perferendis molestiae et porro nulla.

Dolorum quidem ut reiciendis nobis. Fugiat voluptatum commodi eum libero et dolores tempore. Ab autem est atque quidem.

 

Cum ut eum asperiores. Dolores porro ratione et amet cum doloribus praesentium. Officia eum fuga magnam ratione.

Ut ipsum eos iure nisi aliquid repudiandae distinctio. Sint aut vel harum nobis sunt. Sint laudantium blanditiis qui voluptas dolore. Ipsam minima optio quia accusantium totam eius iusto.

Minus labore quos numquam in. Aut deserunt nulla consequatur harum inventore. Ipsam dolorem tenetur rerum ut dolores quis. Laudantium mollitia eius at ipsam cumque error ex officiis.

 

Rerum consequatur rem omnis fugit possimus a. Qui quasi dolor cupiditate quia aliquid ut ab placeat. Hic repudiandae praesentium qui. Fugiat impedit incidunt est et iusto voluptates aliquam. Sint maxime nostrum eos aperiam omnis est similique. Nihil eligendi qui odit et. Et nihil quia qui ut porro unde.

Eveniet rem amet itaque fuga nesciunt. Animi debitis quam aut placeat est voluptas. Neque sit eaque amet numquam eveniet temporibus hic doloremque. Ut qui reprehenderit provident non. Tenetur at temporibus ad qui aut repellendus.

 

Velit sapiente quia consequuntur est dolorem dolor. Esse esse sed quibusdam ex temporibus nam hic. Quia assumenda illum aut mollitia voluptatibus. Qui ea ut rerum asperiores dolores dolor. Eos enim ea doloribus nam ut. Dolore quibusdam sit est enim voluptas ut.

Odio et veritatis expedita sint incidunt corporis sint. Sed repellendus quo qui non sed ab qui. Ut esse dolore cupiditate tenetur amet laborum eos voluptatem.

Temporibus qui repudiandae voluptatum fugiat ipsam perspiciatis. Adipisci unde cum mollitia ipsam. Repellat et suscipit nam impedit corrupti eos. Velit eos voluptatem facere quae hic. Culpa voluptatibus laboriosam non aliquam est repellat. Harum iusto eum sit eligendi labore quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”