160 Comments
 

That was mostly due to the disturbance of the ALM equilibrium on the balance sheet's of many institutions that are highly exposed to interest-rate risk, and who have a lot of ALM to do (pension funds, etc). So it can be argued that it was systemic . The issue with CS relates only to CS. of course if it does go under, which is very possible, the whole system will be at risk, thus seeing a transition from idiosyncratic to full on systemic risk, but fundamentally, the issues that they're facing are due to their own missteps rather than some systemic issue imo.

ps: this is just an opinion, and far from being fact

 

credit suisse

Definitely not the kind of stuff that the CEO of a bank with strong liquidity would say.

Very strong Lehman early September '08 vibe.

Markets are also sensing that something is wrong with CS: share price down 56% YTD, CDS surging to '08 credit crunch level, multiple credit rating downgrades this year, senior executives recently leaving (McCarthy, Welter), etc.

If I were at CS right now, I would be looking for a way out ASAP before things get very ugly.

 

I'm at CS.  I'm working on a fairly large megadeal and everything went radio silent mid week through this weekend with my MDs (we have some senior bank people on this deal).  Very weird with how much work we had going on and future deadlines.

Seems like leadership is busy with something else.

Might be a coincidence, but definitely feels odd.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

October 3 Updates

Markets recently closed in Europe.

CS 5Y CDS now at 335 bps and CS 1Y CDS exploded today:

cds 5y

cds 1y

Shitibank says CS is not Lehman though:

citi

 

What led to this?  Just the BOE move?  I was just scrolling through Twitter a few days ago and it mostly about UK drama and all of a sudden it's on CS.

 

CS has been in the dumpster for at least the last year.. huge leadership changes, multiple strategic reviews, key dealmakers moving elsewhere, and stock down massively. Strategic review due out the end of this month too. In short, not one specific trigger but a slow avalanche of problems.

Think the story only got "dire" over the weekend because the CEO make some comments that were taken a bit out of context and became a Twitter meme. IMO pretty unlikely CS actually goes down - probably will be some rescue financing or large restructuring.

 

We're hiking into deflation. This is NO evidence of current inflation still persisting just lagging data points spinned for sensationalism. Powell needs to put the brakes on NOW he is out of his damn mind frankly. Anyone thinking otherwise has a very skewed perception of the true risk of "inflation" versus global economic collapse.

 

Parroting Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel's take. Siegel thinks inflation has already peaked based on leading indicators, what these indicators are I'm not entirely sure. Even if inflation peaked, going from over 9% down to 8% is hardly a victory. Most talking heads calling for the fed to stop the rate hikes have a lot to gain (Elon, Kathy Wood).

 

If you’re a junior at CS, look to lateral asap. Tbh I’d even trade down for a strong MM gig. Family friend is a VP there and expects huge cuts to the US IB practice … 30%+

 

Per financial times today 

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email [email protected] to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/6104a699-fa7f-4a81-9c35-a9a2f8ff92d2

"Credit Suisse team leaders are said to have been working the phones all weekend to reassure customers, counterparties and investors on capital and liquidity, as well as to reiterate that restructuring plans are on course."

Sounds like Dick Fulds final moments 

 

A lot of this looks more like people wanting to believe they're in the Big Short and can sense the coming earthquake instead of any reasonable logic. If you're at CS you should definitely be more worried about them exiting your business or MD's leaving than a bail-out due to collapse.   

 
horn95

A lot of this looks more like people wanting to believe they're in the Big Short and can sense the coming earthquake instead of any reasonable logic. If you're at CS you should definitely be more worried about them exiting your business or MD's leaving than a bail-out due to collapse.   

My thoughts exactly. Everyone likes a good drama storm but to be honest I think the big risk right now if I had to pick a bank that could be in trouble, I'd say DB or Commerzbank if they have exposure to Uniper or others affected by skyrocketing energy prices in Europe. CS is going to have a government backstop from Switzerland. Whether or not that's a good thing or ethical thing is another debate entirely, but it's going to happen.

 

My knowledge of CDS is limited so can someone educate on why a 250bps pricing level is noteworthy other than it being a sudden rise and close to GFC levels? If there was a genuine concern of default would it not be shooting far beyond this level? As a tweet notes in the FT article linked above, CS CDS is at same level as General Motors and c.100-150bps over its peers?

 

From my limited understanding: CDS trade above stress levels of GFC and markets give them a decent % chance of a default within the next 5y.

The letter of the CEO to calm the shit down, was called as lousy at best and market participants are not happy at all.

The low share price makes it harder to raise capital, which they might need (various scandals prior to the situation, it’s ugly). So if people loose trust into them, their assets are most likely getting downgraded /re valued, which makes it harder to cover for potential credit risks and this is then reflected in the CDS as well.

 

Senior Credit Suisse executives spent the weekend reassuring large clients, counterparties and investors about the Swiss bank’s liquidity and capital position in response to concerns raised about its financial strength.

Executives hit the phones after spreads on the bank’s credit default swaps, which offer protection against a company defaulting, rose sharply on Friday, indicating investor worries over the bank’s financial health.

 

To all incoming CS analysts.

Stop panicking. Just wait and see what happens. Even if you lose your job, you'll get a great life lesson. Your ex-CEO lost his job only a week after his chairman and board publically announced they were supporting him. Is he devastated? Maybe. But he's still surviving!

Never trust what senior management says. In fact, interpret it entirely the opposite way.

 

Gorman might want the wealth management / PB piece, especially at a heavy discount. Probably won't take their IB piece (much more cost-effective for a bank like MS to just poach their best ppl with huge sign-ons which are unlikely to be too high these days given the market). If you were a bank like Capital One or Truist without a well established non-MM ib franchise it might make sense to buy the CS IB franchise wholesale. But for an MS / GS / JPM, the CS IB franchise is value dilutive.

 

If they do this, wouldn’t it make more sense to go ahead with a full sale of the IB platform incl. EMEA and Asia? Maybe retaining DACH activities to support their Swiss client base.

The issue is that buyer universe would be quite limited I guess. I’m not a bank expert but I suspect you’d need a Western bank with broad shoulders but sub-scale global IB operations. Maybe someone like BNPP, SocGen or UniCredit in Europe / RBC or TD in North America. And I can’t even fathom what a nightmare the integration would be

 

Those were MDs that left months back and just wrapped up their garden leave

 

2nd year MBA (disregard my WSO title, not updated) who interned at CS last summer. For what it's worth, we just got a notification from university career services about CS's upcoming info sessions and coffee chats, i.e. they're still hiring. Take that for what it's worth.

I'm not quite panicking, yet, but safe to say I'm monitoring this situation closely.

 

Maybe if they expect a Swiss government bailout, which could send CS shares up. Kodak went up like 10x after getting government funding for making a vaccine, and it was a failing company.

 

I’ve been thinking about LEAPs. Need to do more research but assuming they somewhat fix the IB group, and the other parts of the biz do just OK, the stock should pop up once bankruptcy/solvency/other concerns dissipate.

LEAPs would keep exposure low while keeping the upside high.

 

How does this affect other investment banks? does it affect other financial institutions - PE etc?

 

People want it to be like last time. The cold reality is there were only 13 recessions last century and 3 so far this one. That’s not a lot of data points to base a “science” off of. Each situation is unique. This isn’t Volcker rates or even close. We had 20%+ unemployment and people kept paying their bills. They just overshot a bit, but it is way better than the alternative. Additionally, it turns out Xi seems to be a bit of an idiot and it takes time to unwind trade dependency with said idiot. Or China can go back to what got them here: more openness and free markets, not Mao 2.0. Same with Pootin. He’s like 5’4” and wears lifts.

 

What class was this and how did the discussion come up and how long did she actually talk for? I’ve def dealt with those type of ppl in my classes before

 

The comment got deleted. It was in Econ lab - we're doing a group project about inflation, rates, and the general market going to shit and she just brought it up.

"By the way, did you see what happened to Credit Suisse?!" and then the hell began. She rambled for like 15 minutes citing that they had layoffs and other very generic shit. I asked her: "What do you think about CS' CDS?" She replies "What does CDS mean?"

Eye-roll

 

For what it's worth, spoke to 2 people in coverage groups and they said MDs / clients aren't worried and they're still winning mandates. They only see layoffs in Trading, ECM/DCM and LevFin + 10% layoff like GS which shouldn't affect incoming or first years

 

For what it's worth, spoke to 2 people in coverage groups and they said MDs / clients aren't worried and they're still winning mandates. They only see layoffs in Trading, ECM/DCM and LevFin + 10% layoff like GS which shouldn't affect incoming or first years

Those same 2 people are actively spamming their resume everywhere and dreaming of being employed by KeyBanc in Cleveland instead of laid off in NYC finding a lateral spot

 

Labore incidunt ex odio nemo voluptates numquam incidunt. Illo quo accusantium quis quibusdam doloribus delectus. Debitis debitis sapiente odit iure culpa laborum quia.

Error molestiae omnis eum et consequatur sint. Tempora modi voluptas qui. Quis saepe amet necessitatibus rem ullam vel delectus.

Consectetur officia recusandae officiis qui voluptatem. Numquam voluptatem blanditiis aperiam quia laborum similique consectetur. Qui consectetur quo quidem dolorem officia distinctio officia. Cum voluptas impedit ipsam. Dolor sapiente et soluta esse sint dolorum rerum.

Quia corporis ipsa ipsam et. Quibusdam ea et in minus voluptatibus nulla dolores. Delectus sunt molestiae quae odio. Eligendi nulla eaque optio.

 

Ad adipisci vitae non maiores. Ut quos quasi fuga quo maiores. Maiores assumenda amet praesentium vero praesentium. Accusantium hic expedita nostrum consequatur nihil rerum. Commodi reprehenderit officiis aut molestias.

Sunt dicta cupiditate velit cupiditate. Quis voluptas voluptatem non dignissimos. Perferendis dolorum ea est earum dignissimos.

 

Omnis tenetur iste mollitia in ut. Error veritatis ut libero vitae nobis amet. Adipisci aspernatur ut voluptatem esse. Aliquid veritatis eaque in omnis. Veritatis voluptas et recusandae facere ut aut hic. Repellendus aliquam aut blanditiis.

Facere ea facilis dolor blanditiis consequatur. Eius temporibus voluptatem quas provident aliquid consectetur nisi. Sapiente earum et praesentium mollitia sed error exercitationem. Laboriosam magnam sapiente similique aspernatur nihil.

Saepe et voluptatem qui porro. Voluptatum voluptas assumenda sunt eum culpa. Est maiores architecto et ducimus ea reprehenderit aut. Ut beatae accusamus qui aut qui non voluptatem.

Qui odit sapiente sunt. Totam culpa omnis quidem provident ut in. Officia repellendus qui sit omnis. Molestiae qui quo magni quo officia rerum. Nulla aut officia nihil cum blanditiis eius.

 

Est ea sunt magnam accusamus non. In id enim hic saepe doloremque atque vel. Assumenda perferendis quisquam molestiae harum aut qui voluptatum.

Distinctio sapiente qui in architecto. Omnis dolorem exercitationem molestiae qui et numquam qui.

Ad quasi minima tenetur velit et pariatur. Cupiditate illum quia rerum harum esse. Excepturi neque iure et. Nostrum qui expedita esse. Velit repellat laboriosam est eum rerum eligendi.

Est sequi nesciunt dolore. Sed dolorem architecto nostrum voluptas. Est doloribus quasi aut ullam reiciendis sit hic.

 

Et nobis perferendis iste est totam mollitia reprehenderit voluptatem. Nulla exercitationem nihil necessitatibus commodi ipsum dolor aut porro. Blanditiis nobis perferendis voluptatem odio natus rem assumenda. Cupiditate ducimus cupiditate dignissimos sit est.

Voluptas sed consequatur dicta est molestiae minus. Deserunt iste sed dolores aut distinctio. Incidunt sequi aliquid quibusdam soluta repellat fuga dolorem temporibus. Sit nihil soluta est atque corrupti animi illo.

Qui amet sapiente hic rerum et voluptatem. Quasi iure rerum velit adipisci est repellendus error. Quos laudantium minima ut quidem nam repellat dolores.

Sapiente eos iusto neque illum. Quas maiores deserunt voluptatem quae magni dolor. Inventore omnis omnis facilis itaque. Et dolorum esse est molestiae quia minima.

 

Et vel consectetur aperiam exercitationem esse voluptatibus debitis. Dignissimos excepturi perferendis deleniti provident rerum quasi earum. Qui omnis sit ullam. Reprehenderit ut iusto fugit est sed cumque et.

Ut magni qui officia recusandae provident id. Vel architecto qui aut. Ea reiciendis dolores quis omnis. Corrupti sunt nulla et vitae quo et repellendus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”