Do BB bankers really make that much money when you adjust for the cost of living?
Most of the big banks are in New York and Glassdoor has their salary between $100-$150k first year. $150k is like $60-$70K In Texas dollars.
Most of the big banks are in New York and Glassdoor has their salary between $100-$150k first year. $150k is like $60-$70K In Texas dollars.
+167 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 63 | 1h | |
+121 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 59 | 7h | |
+85 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 61 | 3h | |
+40 | Ranking banks that went under | 24 | 4h | |
+39 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 20 | 5h | |
+36 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 25 | 1h | |
+33 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 17 | 1h | |
+27 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 2d | |
+27 | Intern Ettiquette | 4 | 1d | |
+23 | What are hours like at BBs in London? | 47 | 1d |
Career Resources
You can always work for the BBs in their energy groups in Houston and make the same amount of money in Texas... people don't do these jobs for the salary out of the gate, they take them because of the long term growth and career opportunities.
True, but energy sucks.
To each their own. Energy banking is one of the most lucrative fields out there (no pun intended) - and for those who enjoy it, kudos to them.
Depends on what you are doing in energy.... its a big place.
Energy is quite interesting on the contrary
Also, some people actually like NYC. Personally, Texas is great, but I'd rather live in NYC than Texas.
Agreed with that, but OP clearly thinks NYC is too expensive for him.
.
It's worse at the analyst level, most need to have a roommate or two in order to survive off their salary. But that's partly because when they do get out of the office, many go all out with vacations, dinners, bottles at clubs etc. If someone is frugal they can save a good chunk of cash even as an analyst. $150k is basically what a first/second year analyst makes all in, and to anyone outside finance that's a very good comp.
Once you get to associate comp and later, you should be fine in New York. You wont be able to ball out in a two bedroom apartment all by yourself, but on the flipside a $300 dinner every once in a while wont kill you.
I've frugal as hell. What do you think?
You've grammar as hell too.
Consumption creeps up on you. IP in 2017 spends money differently than he did in 2010. The rusty honda (whose bottom is literally falling apart due to rust) is getting replaced with a used Lincoln or Buick. However, it will still have a trailer hitch installed.
You will start off by splitting a four bedroom flat with a kooky roommate in Jersey City and eventually graduate to a fifth floor walkup studio on 11th ave.
But yes, in Manhattan I lived in a fifth floor studio walkup. In Chicago I own a 46th floor 900 square foot condo with a partially obstructed view of Lake Michigan, an indoor pool, and an elevator. The condo costs less than the fifth floor Manhattan walkup.
But in the meantime, save as much as you can, and never forget what a dollar gets you in the Midwest.
Also look at Wells Fargo in Charlotte or SunTrust in Atlanta. At both firms you'll make pay similar to NYC with a fraction of the COL/Taxes.
Chicago, Dallas, Houston. you could
SF, NYC, Denver (MM banks) London not a chance on your base. bonus is taxed at like 45-48%
Bonus is taxed at the marginal rate; there is no separate tax rate for a bonus.
If you disagree with this link to the bonus tax rate. Note I said tax rate and not withholding rate, but if you are single in ny your withholding rate is already very high.
I think the better question is what shakes out when you adjust for the hours?
Oh god its like $35k/year. Might as well work 3 jobs. To me, IB comp doesn't make much sense. My dad works 2 jobs that require an associates degree for around 70-80 hours week and makes 100k/yr.
Have even taken high taxes into consideration.
Nobody works IB for the analyst comp - they do it for more lucrative opportunities or to climb the ladder. If you're such a chimp that you can't understand the difference between your dad earning 100k near or at the peak of his career, vs. an analyst that STARTS at 150K and can make $1MM or more as an MD in 12-15 years, then I don't know how else to explain this to you. Now of course, that's not guaranteed, but that's why IB is a hard industry to be in. And yes, while most people I know who went to IB left after their analyst years - ALL of them are in comfortable 9-5 jobs that pay 200K+ now (before 30), or are in PE making quite a bit more.
You're comparing apples to oranges when you're comparing somebody in his 40s or 50s to somebody who's 22.
What I'm trying to say is there are better career opportunities. VC and PE hire out of undergrad. Elite Boutiques have much higher compensation. Tech. Corporative Development. The list goes on.
Dawg, I made an active choice to leave IB and pursue consulting.
BTW - how many opportunities are there in VC/PE out of undergrad? You'll be doing bitch work, same as IB analyst. The best opportunities generally only hire after IB analyst years.
Same thing holds for EBs. And not everyone wants to pursue tech.
Also, arguing with some random college student from some shit state university on the internet that spells 'corporate' as 'corporative' is a waste of my time. See ya later.
Edit: WAIT, EVEN BETTER. I looked up your old threads and you're the moron from community college with a 2.8 GPA. Great story, still a moron.
I think the OP's main questions is if you look at people at equal points in their career, let's say 2 people are VPs at GS and one lives in NY while the other lives in (insert random smaller city here) etc, is living in NY worth it (Do you get paid more in NY than in small city)?
That answer is most likely a case by case analysis. Consisting of how much the individuals make, how far the dollar goes in their respective city, and as I mentioned in my post below - what are the extras that people are spending those dollars on. (I used 5 star hotels as an example).
I would say that yes, all else being equal and assuming that the VPs above have the exact same salary perfectly adjusted for CoL. The NY VP makes more overall than the small city VP because the NY VP can buy more "extras"
.
Why is nobody here talking about the kid from Colgate University who's gonna work at the M&A department of Goldman Sachs? Isn't he going to make 7 or even 8 figures after 10 years at GS?
Lol. Have you noticed it's always GS that those kind of videos are about?
That's because they've never done their research and have no clue that other banks exist besides GS. God forbid they pull in 8 figures at JPM in 10 years. Orrrrrrr they just love to troll.
What I was thinking...
Do you have a link to the video? It seems the original was deleted, and I've never seen it yet.
As someone who does not live in a high CoL area, but makes good money and doesn't have to work intense hours very frequently, it is hard for me to ever want to go into banking. My salary adjusted to NYC, places me at a very comfortable level in NYC - BUT when you look down the line, the difference becomes the style of living that one is capable of. If I went on vacation could I stay at a 5 star hotel? If I want it to be a hefty % of my total yearly income sure, but no doubt that a well performing analyst could. These types of "purchases" become your standard as your career in IB progresses, for myself they will be more special occasion luxuries.
Everything becomes about pricing and what % of income an item is. While rent and food may be far more expensive in NYC than it is where I am, the bankers will get more "nice" things.
Cost of Living and Pay (Originally Posted: 01/10/2017)
How do you quantify the income reduction you would accept when moving into a bigger city?
If you're getting paid $100k in city A and moving to city B (2x cost of living), you're probably not going to get a pay bump equivalent to 2x ($200k). This is assuming you have a similar job and role. That said, how much of a hit would you be willing to take on your pay for moving to a bigger city (I understand this is pretty subjective).
Go!
This is a fairly salient question, particularly if one is moving from say a tier 2 or 3 city to New York or London. I'm personally okay with a 15-20% pay bump in this scenario at a minimum, but this is assuming greater promotion prospects and most critically, the optionality (depending on industry of course) that a city like NY or London offers versus in this example say Minneapolis or Houston. You just have to accept you are paying for that. With all that said, it would have to be a better fit role-wise.
Within the US, there are only two costs that I would adjust for cost-of-living, and I would adjust them incrementally from salary using absolute figures, not %s. The two costs are:
For example, soon I will be relocating from Chicago to the Bay Area. Let's say I currently make $130k pre-tax in Chicago.
Which means I would need to make $152k in the Bay Area to equal $130k in Chicago. But note, this also means that if I made $200k in Chicago, I would only need to make $225k in the Bay Area. In my experience, Bay Area jobs pay significantly more than Chicago jobs, even after accounting for this cost-of-living difference.
The point is, if you're negotiating salary on a job in a "low-cost-of-living" city, make sure to do the specific math instead of swallowing the standard "our city is X% cheaper" line from HR.
Note: Buying a house would make this calculation significantly different, but I'd argue that buying real estate is a consumption choice, not a true cost-of-living.
Not sure how you're coming up with your estimates, but you can actually save a decent amount in NY. Things that are more expensive in other cities (like travel in sf/LA) are cheaper in ny.
My brother worked in NY as an ib analyst. All in comp was $150k, $180k, $210k over the three years.
For tax, don't look at the tax bracket rate, that doesn't make sense. You need to look at effective tax rate, which is ~35% on all-in comp. that brings you to $98k, $117k, $137k.
Less $25k for rent and $10k for living expenses. that brings you to $63k, $82k, $102k.
spend another $10k per year on god knows what and you'll still average $70k per year in savings.
Just because you couldn't break in because of the 2.8 from a community college, doesn't mean you need to look down on those who could. It is a great career path and opens a ton of doors for those who are there.
What is the community college cutoff for investment banking? How about University of Phoenix Online?
Well Texas sucks, so theres that
why would you reference two jobs that pay $30k instead of one job that pays $60k? Surely someone who has the competency and background to consider BB IB can land a $60k job, no? Whose dream isn't to be an FP&A god?
Buyside/Prop FTW. CT, NJ, IL and even CA if you're lucky are a bit less "shitty".
Having any sort of job is a true fortune, but how are you going to talk down to those who break into BB banking!? Regardless of the COL, some people enjoy the NYC life and that compensation is more than enough to live a comfortable lifestyle there. SMH OP
I don't understand the people talking about the NY "lifestyle". If you're working 80-100 hours a week how much time could you possibly have to enjoy it?
68-88 hours per week
No we dont, not near enough.
Can OP break into the cashier group of McDonalds from a non-target with a sub 3.0 GPA????
When you adjust your salary for income taxes, state taxes, city taxes and cost of living you're probably make the same per hour as a McDonald's employee. The only difference is you work more hours
Totally man, that's why you see so many Target and McDonalds employees driving their Audi's around the Hamptons.
Granted expenses vary due to spending habits and where you choose to live... but this is interesting: http://money.cnn.com/calculator/pf/cost-of-living/
apparently, according to that chart, I make just under first year IB money being in my area and I work 50 hours a week. lol.
Sounds like paradise to me.
I don't have time to read all the comments right now, but the short answer is no.
When you adjust for the following the income drops pretty quickly:
High Taxes in NYC
High COL in NYC
Twice the average hours a person works - This one is killer, divide 120K by 4000 and the hourly rate drops quickly to that of a Chik Fil A manager. Of course this is only true at the very entry levels, moving up brings significant pay bumps.
When you break it down they still make more money, but they work more too. As previously mentioned, a bigger reason people go into the field is for the exit opportunities it presents.
Thanks, that breakdown was super informative. And yeah living in NYC is crazy--just read King of Capital and see where some of those guys started off their first years in the industry in terms of living arrangements.
I would not let location, or costs affect your choice of career. I would figure out your end goal and work backwards from there. This is something I tell a lot of people. Sort of like a binomial model tree, there are many paths to achieve your goals in life. If your goal is purely to make as much money as possible then get into sales and kill it. If your goal is to have a great career but focus mostly on your side hustle/enjoying life, then find something MO and still make a ton of money but just a little slower.
Keep moving towards your goals and stay motivated and educated.
how can you expect to work in banking op and not understand basic micro eco
Wow - so much IB defensiveness and bashing here.
I grew up in the suburbs in a Southern state. The mortgage on the house I grew up in (middle/upper middle close) was approximately half of what I now pay to rent a small one bedroom in Manhattan. I used to be of the "this is way too expensive stupid cold why does anyone live here" variety but I've come to appreciate it.
Five (or 3) years ago me would kick me in the balls for saying it, but I can understand why people that can afford it pay up to be in NYC. NYC is a city on a scale different from any in the U.S. (I say this having lived in SF and Chicago, though not LA/Miami). World class everything (food, transportation, entertainment, culture, arts, social opps, diversity, job opportunities). In exchange you have one good that is stupidly expensive: housing (ok, alcohol too). If you are over the threshold where your salary can absorb a few GS a month of rent/housing (say guaranteed $150K/yr) it is, dare I say, worth it.
Obviously, the calculus changes as you age/ go through different phases of life. Once you have kids (or even a serious relationship), the value of a lot of NYC amenities (esp. entertainment and social opps) plunge b/c you no longer take as much advantage. Your costs also tend to rise and become less flexible (kids). At that point I can see why you'd want to go elsewhere (elsewhere being Chicago/SF/ parts of Virginia, think it would be hard to go back to a Southern suburb).
+SB, I agree with this 100%. Obviously people have varying opinions but Dazedmonk says it perfectly. If you want to live in NYC and have an opportunity there then take it. I personally chose a second tier city with a high salary. My decision was driven on giving me the ability to focus on things outside of work (sports/traveling) while still making good money.
Yeah I think this is really what attacked the core of the problem and answer all the relevant questions. Glad to know that this has become such a popular thread.
Would like to say I did make this discussion more heated and less rationale by inserting "liberal" and "shithole" into it, but perhaps we may have not arrived at these conclusions without it.
Great job man, if I was an MD, I would hire you. You executed were all other monkeys failed.
All that's missing from this thread is that guy from around six years ago who said you need to make $500k to be middle class in NYC. I wonder if he'd adjust that upward now.
Fugit ullam ut illo aliquam ad. Consequatur itaque architecto aut repellendus totam dolor nulla. Dignissimos repellendus sed eligendi ut placeat nemo vel. Ut modi voluptatem quis odio quas et. Tempora quibusdam adipisci error sed numquam. Quasi ducimus aut hic ad.
Aut consequatur pariatur unde quia culpa. Excepturi tempore fuga soluta illo facere inventore nobis. Saepe itaque ut tempora sint facere perspiciatis qui. Voluptas velit eos quos alias.
Quia doloremque a non aut sapiente possimus aperiam. Minima fugit aperiam quia voluptas ipsum. Quia dolores ex aut pariatur ut optio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Veritatis ipsa molestiae quam laboriosam provident quia consequuntur delectus. Nemo neque ipsum et sequi. Autem consequuntur consectetur et voluptas quisquam fugit quam.
Nihil natus dolor rem ipsam saepe fuga qui. Amet ut quibusdam quod harum quibusdam eaque illum impedit. Iusto odio dolorum a molestiae. Corporis atque et deleniti aut dolorem. Assumenda quae voluptatibus reiciendis ut officia. Est ratione libero autem facere.
Adipisci ad quaerat ab neque libero. Magni similique fugiat et nam debitis exercitationem. Aut eveniet delectus facilis aut aut. Provident quibusdam ab rerum sint accusamus voluptatem quia.