Fundamental Fixed Income Analysis Techniques?

Hi all,

I've recently wanted to learn how to invest in fixed income and was wondering what models, etc. are used to evaluate these types of securities. For example, in valuing equities from a bottoms-up perspective, we use either comps or DCF analysis and I was wondering if the same ideas are used for fixed income or if it's different.

Even though I'm not sure I want to invest in fixed income professionally, I want to learn how to do it as a hobby, which is why I'm asking this. How would I go about, for example, evaluating whether a speculative/junk bond from a company like Nokia would be profitable if held to maturity? Additionally, would I even need to worry about an increase in interest rates if I'm holding securities till maturity and am basically looking to make sure that the yield I'm getting from interest and principle paydowns is secure, or do changes in interest rates still need to be monitored for an objective like this?

Thanks!

 

It can be a lot more exciting if it is distressed or in bankruptcy; however the most common ratios to look at are leverage and debt coverage (i.e. do they make enough $ to cover current portion of debt obligations).

Also,, on more technical levels, some funds use cap structure arbitrage, such as if the debt is mispriced in comparison to the equity, so on so forth. Check out website for distressed stuff: http://www.distressed-debt-investing.com/

Also check out Fabozzi Fixed Income book.

Regards

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 

Your analysis will depend on whether or not you hold bonds to maturity or buy and sell before that. Bonds have contractual coupons so you know the cash flows in advance. If you buy and hold your concern is can this company generate sufficient cash from operations to service it's debt? This involves basic fundamental analysis and cash flow modelling like that done by an equity analyst. If you're planning on actively jumping in and out on bonds you are likely going to be using relative value and comparing spreads of various bonds with similar credit characteristics. For example, 2 bonds issued by wall mart and cosco might trade at different spreads and you think they should trade at the same spread, so you might go long the bond with the wider spread and sell when it converges.

 
Best Response

You care about different things with fixed income (i.e. will you get paid back with interest?). So to the extent you can quantify that via leverage and coverage ratios you should. Bond prices and yields are pure math. The amount of work you have to do to feel comfortable with a debt investment is a lot lower than an equity investment IMO (with the exception of distressed-type situations). You still want to look at the financial statements and overall business.

If you are going to hold to maturity, then you don't really care about interim moves, unless you're using leverage and have to monitor prices for calls. You do care about moves caused by changes in the underlying business, though, which could signal a change in the likelihood of the company's ability to take out your debt.

One thing to always do is analyze the entire capital structure to see where your prospective investment falls in terms of seniority and collateral. Also, understand where the securities are trading that are both junior and senior to yours to see if you're missing anything, or to identify capital structure arbitrage opportunities.

 

Wow, thanks everyone for responding so quickly. Let me attempt to further clarify my goals with FI investments. Essentially, I'm looking to hold the bond till maturity and am mostly looking to analyze speculative/junk grade companies that would have a fairly decent yield. Therefore, I'm mostly looking at how I would go about analyzing whether or not a firm (maybe even countries if I ever decide to look into public debt) will be able to pay me back with the interest. A lot of you already mentioned this, but I just thought I'd clarify once and for all.

Looking at firms such as Microsoft aren't that exciting to me (seems pretty safe and thus would have an unattractive yield) , so for my own sake, I'd probably venture more into companies that are struggling but still aren't extremely risky either (hence why I mentioned the example of Nokia). If I ever did this professionally, I too would hope to work on the distressed/hyper-risky type of securities, but I'm not sure at the moment if I want to pursue investing professionally as a career (we'll see if I change my mind).

Are there good books on analyzing securities with my goals? One person mentioned a book by Fabozzi, which I will look into, but any others?

Thanks again!

 

Distressed bonds are different than just high yield. With distressed bonds, you aren't exactly thinking about "will I get my coupons and face value back at maturity?" With distressed, you're looking at a bankruptcy scenario where you are buying a bond for dirt cheap and hoping your payout is greater than what you bought it for (i.e. debt rolled over, post re-org equity, etc). 

Based on what you described, I think Oil and Gas Credit is perfect for you to analyse. Those bonds tend to have high interest rates. You want to analyse leverage ratios for the companies, look at what drives cash flows (operating cash flow specifically), look at CapEx requirements, build out production schedules, etc.

 

Placeat ea nobis qui aut. Enim dolor dolore veniam eveniet qui et sit. Nostrum nesciunt aut hic perferendis porro odio minus. Ratione similique nemo eos modi sit ipsum. Impedit alias animi enim minus quae. Expedita autem dolores consequatur sapiente eos porro mollitia.

Voluptatem est ipsum veritatis aperiam. Quo eveniet doloremque a iure laboriosam earum. Necessitatibus possimus voluptas illum eaque ab reiciendis. Ut totam sed excepturi mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”