If you want a top MBA, avoid trading

From seeing my trader friends get absolutely crushed with top b-school admissions the past few years, I'm convinced that if you have any intention of going to a top school, avoid trading. The skillsets you develop there are not what schools want. Fair or unfair, they just don't like traders. Even working at a second-tier consulting firm like Deloitte will be better than working at Getco/Jane Street.

 
ERGOHOC:
I can see why. Besides, trader-turned-MBA-applicant = Loser

This sentiment (largely among posters here in highschool and college) is what makes this board really clownish. People all have different career paths in life and I certainly don't think someone who leaves a trading job to seek a top MBA is a loser. You need to get a grip on reality and stop your internet prestige whoring.

 

Of the three traders I know who applied to B school , one went to GSB , one to Wharton and one to Columbia. I think that your friends might not be marketing themselves correctly

 
OMS:
y the hell would you want to go to bschool after a trading gig?

Depends. If you traded say , CMBS or Credit Exotics or Interest Rate Swaps , your options are very narrow unless you want to continue in that specific instrument. You might want to broaden the range of jobs that you can take. You might want a broader exposure to finance and business. Even if it teaches you nothing , a good MBA opens up doors for you - that's undeniable

 
Bobb:
Didn't ShortTheWorld get into Duke from Trillium?

Couldn't a trader apply to B-School be viewed as someone who failed and couldn't cut it in S&T?

One could say the same thing about a consultant/corp-dev/IBD/Hedge Fund analyst as well. Don't many firms promote internally to associate and beyond?

 
Best Response

I think this is very much true for prop trading firms, much less so for top sell-side and definitely buyside trading desks. Part of it is self-selection. The good traders at shops like Getco/Jane Street/drw/sig/jump are much less willing to give up their earning potential for a full-time mba, so many of them actually do the part-time mba at booth to pick up additional knowledge. Another thing is that prop traders don't really have the type of work experience that adcom wants to see (bunch of liberal arts politically correct women for the most part), and it's very difficult to show those attributes in the application.

 
Brady4MVP:
I think this is very much true for prop trading firms, much less so for top sell-side and definitely buyside trading desks. Part of it is self-selection. The good traders at shops like Getco/Jane Street/drw/sig/jump are much less willing to give up their earning potential for a full-time mba, so many of them actually do the part-time mba at booth to pick up additional knowledge. Another thing is that prop traders don't really have the type of work experience that adcom wants to see (bunch of liberal arts politically correct women for the most part), and it's very difficult to show those attributes in the application.

The funny thing is - HFT might actually be better for this as you co-ordinate among network engineers , developers and researchers.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
Brady4MVP:
I think this is very much true for prop trading firms, much less so for top sell-side and definitely buyside trading desks. Part of it is self-selection. The good traders at shops like Getco/Jane Street/drw/sig/jump are much less willing to give up their earning potential for a full-time mba, so many of them actually do the part-time mba at booth to pick up additional knowledge. Another thing is that prop traders don't really have the type of work experience that adcom wants to see (bunch of liberal arts politically correct women for the most part), and it's very difficult to show those attributes in the application.

The funny thing is - HFT might actually be better for this as you co-ordinate among network engineers , developers and researchers.

I also did quite a lot of volunteer work when I was waiting out my 9 month non-compete. I taught Math and Science to poor kids. You must have done other things along some lines

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
Brady4MVP:
I think this is very much true for prop trading firms, much less so for top sell-side and definitely buyside trading desks. Part of it is self-selection. The good traders at shops like Getco/Jane Street/drw/sig/jump are much less willing to give up their earning potential for a full-time mba, so many of them actually do the part-time mba at booth to pick up additional knowledge. Another thing is that prop traders don't really have the type of work experience that adcom wants to see (bunch of liberal arts politically correct women for the most part), and it's very difficult to show those attributes in the application.

The funny thing is - HFT might actually be better for this as you co-ordinate among network engineers , developers and researchers.

Hmm. This is actually a good point. I know one guy from Getco/jump starting at stanford gsb this fall, and he told me that in his application he emphasized the fact that he coordinated projects between programmers, IT guys, traders, etc. He made sure to hit home the point that his job involved leadership and teamwork. Plus, he had insane stats, which always helps.

I think the sample size of people from top prop shops applying to MBA is too small to draw a definitive conclusion, although my impression is that adcom in general does not think that the skillsets deployed in trading add much value to a b-school classroom.

 

I was a trader and met a few while I was thinking about business school. I think you guys forget one major thing about trading that causes a lot of people to leave. It gets boring after a while and if you do semi decent you can afford to do other things in several different fields. Not one trader I met during the business school process was a loser and most went back into trading a either a new product or sales after MBA. Several went to management consulting in the product their traded MBA

 
melvvvar:
HFT trading exciting?

are you fucking kidding me? any actual HFT traders on here?

It's initially exciting because it's so novel. But , later on it really begins to drag. It also pigeonholes you like no other industry.

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/company/goldman-sachs><abbr title=Goldman Sachs&#10;>GS</abbr></a></span>:
melvvvar:
HFT trading exciting?

are you fucking kidding me? any actual HFT traders on here?

It's initially exciting because it's so novel. But , later on it really begins to drag. It also pigeonholes you like no other industry.

it was novel in 2008 but now the market is saturated and you find out just how replaceable you are. oh well i don't give a shit, plan is to make the fuck you cash in

 

This thread is retarded. There's no point in talking in generalizations like this. It's a waste of time. There are former traders at HBS, there are former HF analysts at HBS. Lloyd Blankjew was a trader, looks like he managed okay without yalls brilliant industry insight.

I was taught that the human brain was the crowning glory of evolution so far, but I think it's a very poor scheme for survival.
 

Of course if you've had it with trading it would be a good move, I totaaly forgot about the option of a career switch. Just meant that I thought an MBA would not advance your career as a trader.

And I've only been trading for a while so to me it's still lots of fun.

 

Est rerum maxime excepturi quia excepturi similique dolorem. Atque et voluptatem aperiam enim laboriosam reiciendis. Explicabo molestiae non quis ea. Magnam quia voluptatem eveniet vel.

Molestiae ea et qui laboriosam. Sed aut alias dolorum et nam et iste. Officiis distinctio est quam voluptas recusandae nesciunt unde. Sed facere rerum quis mollitia deleniti ipsam.

 

Sint dolorum minus culpa quia ab harum. Dolorem excepturi est voluptatum et consequatur quasi minus.

Nostrum commodi minus non ut. Commodi vel inventore laborum omnis ipsa quia modi consequatur. Sapiente quos laborum id reprehenderit et. Qui aut dolorem dolorem provident. Qui eos voluptatem dolores aut enim quaerat. Magnam consequatur explicabo mollitia. Quia debitis quas tempora eveniet in et.

Architecto minus et sed impedit cupiditate et. Numquam itaque dolor fuga sint molestias nisi. Accusamus aliquid quisquam labore sit voluptatem et.

Stefan van Woenzel

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”