While I am not in PE, I can tell you that MDs and Principals travel quite frequently. I imagine it varies as in most jobs, but activities such as fund-raising can require a fair amount of leg work. Then there are the crazy one-off situations; For example, a family member of mine who is an MD had to spend 6 weeks in China setting up a new satellite office.

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 
Best Response

3rd Year Analyst

I generally work 60 hours/week (rarely on the weekends)and my travel fluctuates wildly contingent upon the phase of the deal cycle. For example, last December I spent two weeks on the ground in Europe analyzing a potential retail acquisition. The trip included traveling to every single site location in the chain (150+) and a subsequent return trip two months later. We also have a Toronto office and I am up there several times a month (luckily the boss has a G5).

Obviously, hours and travel will depend on the size of the fund and the types of deals that your group pursues. For example, we focus primarily on companies (500M-3B EV range) that have strong real-estate platforms in the retail, real estate, lodging, gaming, marina, restaurant, homebuilding, luxury brand industry both domestically and abroad so I travel on an as needed basis.

PS Most of the traveling occurs during the roadshow/fundraising process...

Most of the bigger shops require similar (to slightly less) hours than banking (90+)

 

Does anyone (associate level) at a MM PE fund have any input on this topic? I'm curious how many days per week/month the junior guys will be traveling at a smaller fund. Traveling meaning either overnight for a day or two or even just a day trip here and there. Being in leveraged finance, I travel on occassion to bank/management meetings but I would have to believe that the Sponsor makes several more trips out to the Company during the due diligence process. Can anyone speak to this?

 

i will be applying for a summer analyst stint as a junior coming up at PE fund at one of the BBs

i just wanted to find out the kinds of skills that you learn in PE

is it modeling intensive? i know the mds, vps, and associates go traveling for fund raising but i'm more concerned about the analyst experience

can anyone fill me in?

thanks!

 

I don't think I have ever encountered the word "fratty" employed with such a positive connotation...

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 

Agreed. Lol.

I can attest that PE is substantially more stuffy than banking. There's not nearly as much horsing around and bullshitting. Everyone is all business all the time (atleast thats how it was at my shop and for most of my peers at other similar shops). It took some getting used to, banking was actually a lot of fun. PE not so much. I felt like much more of a grown up. The bullpen setting was definitely sorely missed. And from a purely personal standpoint, I like to be around the other people in my class, besides the camaraderie there's also a strong sense of competitiveness, which you don't really get in the PE environment.

 

I work at a firm slightly bigger than what you mentioned, but hours are generally 9AM to 8PM. It becomes somewhat hard to track because you travel much more and you have a lot more dinners. When entering competitive bid processes, hours can be longer, probably more like 10-midnight. Nothing like banking, though. Very few weekends, and some of the work can be done from home if you choose.

 

GameTheory is correct - MM PE shops tend to have somewhat manageable hours. I'd also argue that the experience you get is more valuable in comparison to a bigger fund. You won't get to work deals featured on the front page of the WSJ, but you will take on a broader, more significant set of responsibilities.

If you're working for a PE firm, you obviously already have the financial skill set to do the job. In order to move up the ladder and be ultimately successful in PE, you need solid execution skills. That being said, the more exposure you have to that aspect of the business, the better. In my opinion, you can get more of that at a MM shop. Just my two cents.

 

Thanks for your answers! I was also wondering about the classic evolution when you enter PE after 2/3 years as an ib analyst. I know it's really tough-some will say impossible but you can still dream..- to become a partner because the current partners are not willing to give you a piece of their carry... Could you please share your experience? Usually how long dos it take to move from associate to Principal to Director...to partner?? Many thanks

 

execution, in the simplest sense, means tangibly getting the deal done. this can encompass a lot of things (negotiation with mgmt, lining up lenders, legal issues, etc.)

as far as a track time line, it really depends on the fund itself and how well you perform. I'm sure any firm would consider adding a partner if he/she was bringing enough to the table

 

It really depends on a number of factors such as how operationally involved is your shop with your portfolio companies, where your portfolio companies and/or potential acquisition targets are located, do you focus solely on domestic targets, what level you are at, etc.

I would say that I travel about 15-20% of the time depending on where we are in the deal cycle (i.e. are we doing any on the ground pre-acquisition due diligence like visiting facilities and attending management meetings, are we meeting with our portfolio company senior level executives for meetings, industry events, etc.). We flew private the majority of the time due to fractional ownership of a jet.

 
basementflat02:

Thanks for the info.
What do you guys hope to really gain from facilities visits? As PE analysts and not operators, what exactly do you expect to uncover that you would be able to recognize, or do you go with consultants/specialists?

Depends on the industry to a certain extent, but lets call a spade a spade - you're checking the box to prepare a diligence defense.

Is some Italian suit wearing HBS-educated finance guy qualified to look at some factory line and make sure everything is up to code? Hell no. You go so that you can say you went and did your best to make sure that the thing at least exists. So if you ever get defrauded and end up in front of a grand jury you can make the argument that you weren't negligent.

Depending on the trade meeting management matters as well sometimes.

As far as private jets, yeah it happens. People tey to use commercial as much as possible in my firm but sometimes there's just no flight. They're not that expensive in the context of a big deal. They're not that cool either.

 

Yes, in banking the facility visits are definitely much more superficial and done for the sake of saying you did it. But my experience in PE was not in-line with what's described by nycbandar. You're putting hundreds of millions of dollars into something, you're not going to do it sight unseen. Would you buy an apartment without having seen it in person? Now multiply that risk by a thousand and add the fact that its not your money and you have to answer for what you did with it.

The visits have several purposes, the biggest IMO is because walking through these facilities and seeing the actual guts of the operation gives you a much better understanding of the business. You see the production line. You see the delivery of raw material being unloaded in the loading dock. You see the factory workers inspecting production as its being pumped out of the machines. You see the rejection bin being shredded into scrap. Its fairly insightful, if you ask me. You get an appreciation for the dynamics and scale and leverage and labor and value chain.

As junkbondswap mentioned, you also get a view of the business that you're not going to get from inside your midtown office, which if you're in the business long enough, has a lot of value. For example, we'd go on site visits and many of the more senior people would come up with some ridiculous insights that I wasn't even close to seeing... based on their experience with portfolio companies or whatever... like the fact that the fleet of older Italian machines are rock solid and the 20 newer machines are much less reliable. Most likely the current sponsor owner saw that they were nearing the end of their investment and tightened the screws on management's capex spend but still wanted to position the company for sale by showing that there's significant capacity headroom to grow into Management's growth projections without having to invest heavily in capex. And so the partner realized the run rate capacity is probably lower than presented by management since 2-4 of the 20 or so newer machines will be down at any given moment and consequently the maintenance capex will likely be higher than presented... and if we want to hit the production figures in our plan we need to either upgrade the equipment or spend more capex to have a few more machines in the production line. That's not something you're going to be able to glean from your Bain report or from the dataroom.

Like most things in this world, you get what you put into it. If you think you have nothing to learn from something, you're not going to learn much.

Its also really fucking cool to see this stuff.

 
Marcus_Halberstram:

Yes, in banking the facility visits are definitely much more superficial and done for the sake of saying you did it. But my experience in PE was not in-line with what's described by nycbandar. You're putting hundreds of millions of dollars into something, you're not going to do it sight unseen. Would you buy an apartment without having seen it in person? Now multiply that risk by a thousand and add the fact that its not your money and you have to answer for what you did with it.

The visits have several purposes, the biggest IMO is because walking through these facilities and seeing the actual guts of the operation gives you a much better understanding of the business. You see the production line. You see the delivery of raw material being unloaded in the loading dock. You see the factory workers inspecting production as its being pumped out of the machines. You see the rejection bin being shredded into scrap. Its fairly insightful, if you ask me. You get an appreciation for the dynamics and scale and leverage and labor and value chain.

As junkbondswap mentioned, you also get a view of the business that you're not going to get from inside your midtown office, which if you're in the business long enough, has a lot of value. For example, we'd go on site visits and many of the more senior people would come up with some ridiculous insights that I wasn't even close to seeing... based on their experience with portfolio companies or whatever... like the fact that the fleet of older Italian machines are rock solid and the 20 newer machines are much less reliable. Most likely the current sponsor owner saw that they were nearing the end of their investment and tightened the screws on management's capex spend but still wanted to position the company for sale by showing that there's significant capacity headroom to grow into Management's growth projections without having to invest heavily in capex. And so the partner realized the run rate capacity is probably lower than presented by management since 2-4 of the 20 or so newer machines will be down at any given moment and consequently the maintenance capex will likely be higher than presented... and if we want to hit the production figures in our plan we need to either upgrade the equipment or spend more capex to have a few more machines in the production line. That's not something you're going to be able to glean from your Bain report or from the dataroom.

Like most things in this world, you get what you put into it. If you think you have nothing to learn from something, you're not going to learn much.

Its also really fucking cool to see this stuff.

You're making a serious run for commenter-of-the-year, dude.

 

It really varies and it will be hard to get a definitive answer. Further, it will be truly dependent on your own skill set and how quickly you work. I have a friend who is a former consultant than is now at a sizable fund. When he first started out, he was working IBD-like hours because he had to figure out how to run a model on top of the other work he was responsible for. A year later, his hours are more similar to my own - 9/10 - 9/10/11. A lot of this will be dependent on the culture of the firm, how deals are sourced, and what you're working on. My group is part of a larger bank so I sometimes feel there is still a culture of face time, but its nothing like when I was in IBD. I know this sounds corny - or maybe mean - but if your primary concern is hours, perhaps you should consider another industry. Its nice to have a life-work balance but at this age, you probably should be focused more on learning.

 

This can be a very subjective.

If I had to tag a figure, I'd say about 7% - 10%, although my colleages (associates and above) travel more. Our trips entails more on-site due diligence visits or supporting the portfolio company through advisory, etc. We have the bargaining power to get potential portfolio partners to come into our office if we need to negotiate.

 

As a Pre-MBA associate, I generally traveled quarterly for board meetings and then as needed for management visits / portfolio monitoring. I've since changed PE shops where my current firm has a tendency to travel less (board meetings sometimes held at our offices, more portfolio management done remotely, consolidate trips so they are back-to-back). At my current firm, I travel approximately 25-50% more than the pre-MBA associates. Most of the increase is due to marketing trips, industry conferences, and "special portfolio company stuff" where the junior guy isn't brought along (example: interviewing new executives in another city).

I'm a bit of a data nerd when it comes to travel. I've tracked every day that I've traveled since I started in PE four years ago. Here is some data to back things up. Note this is just one data point and that experiences can vary widely even within the same PE shop. Note that personal days include weekends where I was out of town. I was in a relationship during my first two years and single in my second two years, which drove the big difference in personal travel.

Two years in pre-MBA role: Personal Travel Days: 47 (6.4%) Work Travel Days: 111 (15.2%)

Two years in post-MBA role: Personal Travel Days: 117 (16.0%) Work Travel Days: 103 (14.1%)

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Depends entirely on the firm. I interviewed with firms that work their post-banking analysts 100 hours a week. The firm I'm going to work for works about 60 hours a week, with no weekends. If you share the name, someone here may know for sure.

~~~~~~~~~~~ CompBanker

CompBanker’s Career Guidance Services: https://www.rossettiadvisors.com/
 

Dolores facere magnam cumque nihil dolor ea. Ad ut asperiores qui mollitia. Velit maiores consequatur cum debitis adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”