Hi Folks. I am a PhD candidate in a STEM field at Stanford. I’ve decided that academia is not for me, so I have been exploring various career options. It seems the two most reasonable options for me areand R&D at a DuPont/3M/Dow Chemical. I’ve been working hard on getting the case studies down, but I’ve recently asked myself “What’s the point?”
A post-PhDconsultant makes, say, $200k all in. R&D scientist is closer to $80-90k. No brainer so far. However, the difference between the two career paths seems to really drop after the two-year stint in . A Glassdoor search for “strategy manager/senior manager” shows that a typical Fortune 500 manager in strategy makes about $110k-130k. This seems like a pretty typical exit position for an consultant.
Now a $30k difference between the two paths is nothing to sneeze at, but it isn’t life changing. And I imagine that R&D is a lot more interesting than “Senior Manager of Midwest Operations” or other middle management. Am I missing something here? Maybe my numbers are off or perhapsalumni shoot up middle management quickly while the scientists and engineers languish. What do you all think? Thanks!
Don't Miss This Awesome Related WSO Content
- Cash traders & sales-traders- what's the point?
- Post-MBA associates- what's the point?
- What's a good Pre-MBA career path for breaking into MBB Consulting?
- Pre-MBA career switch to MBB-- does this ever happen?
- MBB---> PE Megafund- what's the gameplan?
- What's the best career pathway to break into consulting?
- What's an acceptable salary with 3yrs MBB exp?
- Reference Check @ MBB-- Please Help!