Why do top shops (founded by former traders) recruit into IBD rather than S&T?

Many of the founders/key people at multistrategy shops like Moore Capital, GLG, SAC, DE Shaw, Bridgewater, Citadel, and Fortress came from trading backgrounds.

Yet it seems much of the recruiting done by these funds nowadays is into IBD classes rather than S&T - any insights as to why this is happening?

 

Because they want a slave. They don't need someone that has the next great trade, they need someone to model out the trade they've already thought of. A lot of these bigger funds are so institutionalized that you're not really doing the shit that makes investing fun. If you really want that stereotypical HF lifestyle/ work environment, you should look at smaller funds (no guarantee they'll give it to you, but much more likely than with the names you mentioned).

 

Thanks Alex. When looking at smaller funds for the 'stereotypical HF work environment', does it make more sense to come from a S&T rather than IBD background considering you'll be closer to executing the actual trade?

 
Best Response

Not true at all with the funds you mentioned. Moore is a macro fund; they recruit a lot of former S&T guys. SAC does as well, along with ex-equity research people. Bridgewater is a mixed bag; they recruit tons of undergrads and professionals of all stripes. I know ex-consultants who have gotten jobs there. DE Shaw is a quant fund, so they target brilliant math/science students from elite schools and programmers from google/microsoft/facebook. Citadel is multi-strategy, so they run the gamut from sell-side traders to ex-bankers in their global equities group and programmers in high-frequency. Fortress has IBD people in their private equity and event driven funds, but their macro drawbridge fund is composed mostly of traders.

 

Very insightful, thanks a lot Brady. Sseems for more macro-focused funds at least, sell-side trading experience might be relevant/helpful.

Are there particular trading desks that might be better platforms for moving to a macro fund than others? Perhaps FX/rates/commodities over distressed/credit/equities?

 
mca2k4:
Very insightful, thanks a lot Brady. Sseems for more macro-focused funds at least, sell-side trading experience might be relevant/helpful.

Are there particular trading desks that might be better platforms for moving to a macro fund than others? Perhaps FX/rates/commodities over distressed/credit/equities?

Definitely. For macro funds, trading experience in currencies, rates, or commodities, is by far the most common. Exotic equity derivatives can also be useful if a fund engages in volatility trades.

 

Agreed with the other posters.

Keep in mind, a lot of those very large shops also need a lot of support for the traders they do have--research assistants, analysts, accountants, IT, back office stuff, etc. So those positions are more suited to the finance-major, investment banking-focused undergrads.

Metal. Music. Life. www.headofmetal.com
 

Brady is exactly on the point. Top corporate hedge funds (i.e. distressed, equity long/short and mergerarb, credit, etc) will tend to hire mainly bankers and equity research analysts; more macro orientated shops on the other hand will tend to hire FICC (mainly rates/FX) traders, economists, etc. I've worked in t1 funds in both areas, and thish holds true.

 

Many of the top macro funds will recruit some investment bankers for grinding, analyst-type work. These are like 24-25 years olds who have just completed analyst programs and they are perfect because they have good work ethic but none of the skills neccesary to actually take risk and advance into a PM role...so within about a week they will realize that and just shut up and do their work without complaining about being on the bottom of the totem pole for a long time. Higher level jobs like PMs and senior strategist-types who work with the PMs are all experienced hires (often from sell-side trading) and it is very rare for someone to move from an analyst job to anything other then a more-senior analyst without leaving the firm.

 

Perferendis vitae soluta et facere. Doloremque repudiandae architecto veritatis eum fugiat. Et velit incidunt dolor qui excepturi atque non. Aut blanditiis eos eius et perferendis asperiores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”