The All-Powerful Niche

Finding a niche is a piece of advice that I don't often hear given to aspiring investment bankers. But, I think it's one of the more important things that any ambitious professional or aspiring company can do to get ahead.

It's funny, actually. I think that most people are attracted to jobs in investment banking, and private equity precisely because they don't want to find a niche. Junior professionals in the industry are positively terrified of being pigeon-holed in a role that they don't care for.

However, I'd argue that finding a niche that you can get behind is a powerful method for achieving exceptional results in your career. I also believe that owning a niche is a powerful strategy that startups and small companies use to grow into major players.

Let's have a look at the pros of finding a niche and how one can use it to their advantage.

First, I want to again touch upon what I feel is an aversion to niches that exists amongst junior finance professionals. I do feel that there is some validity to the fears of being pigeonholed. Few among us want to be known as the "back office finance specialist" or the best damn internal IT guy at a bank. People are attracted, in large part, to investment banking and PE because it allows them to act purely as business people, with a broad set of skills that are applicable to most general corporate environments.

With that said, finding a niche that you can feel strongly about and excel in is going to be key to your own advancement. Let me share a couple of examples, one from my own time as an Analyst and one of a friend of mine who is currently an Associate at a bulge bracket bank, and let's take a look at how they helped us succeed and stand out in our positions.

My Niche - Becoming an Industry Expert:

Back in my Analyst days, I worked in a group covering Aerospace and Defense companies. While that spans an assortment of sub-industries, there were two particular sectors that just happened to be poised for immense growth and sectors that I found extremely interesting. Unmanned Air Vehicles and Cyber Security.

I was already a strong Analyst with a few deals under my belt, but knew that I could do more to stand out, attain a high ranking (and bonus), and increase my knowledge base in subjects that were both interesting and useful to my group. So, I set out and became something of a subject matter expert. Working alongside a VP, I built out industry-specific pitch books for the UAV and Cyber Security industries and grew intimately familiar with the major players in each field. Beyond showing off my top shelf PPT skills, I was able to join my VP and an MD on a slew of pitches to private equity firms with an interest in the spaces, thus giving me increased exposure both in and out of my firm.

To say that doing this went a long way for me would be an understatement. I got to learn about two industries of interest, got exposure to potential future employers, and was, eventually, rewarded for my extra efforts when bonus time came around.

The Associate - Diving Into a Niche Product to Accelerate Advancement Up the Ranks of the Firm:

While I focused on a niche industry, my friend decided to focus on a niche product within the bank. Mid-way through his second year as an Associate in leveraged finance, he was tapped to join a very specific product group, focusing on asset-backed loans in the middle market. While this may not sound like the sexiest group at the bank, it certainly has some upsides. Namely, a promise of an early promotion if he continues to perform at the high level he has throughout his Associate program.

Already knowing a bit about the product and having an interest in mid-sized companies, the move made perfect sense. While other friends of ours are cranking away at b-school apps, hoping that they'll have something to do after they finish their PE program, he'll be getting promoted, making bank, and working cushy hours.

___________________________________________________________________

Startups and smaller companies, by their very nature, need to find and excel in a niche.

Because of their size, startups can move swiftly in attacking niches in ways that bigger, established companies can't. Without bureaucracy, a young company can make moves and pivot on a dime, target specific end-markets, and respond to customer demands with ease.

Look at Google. What is today an internet giant was once a company with one mission - to make internet searches better. By dominating in that niche, it put itself on a path to become one of the biggest companies on the planet.

Or look at one of the many companies at Y-Combinator's latest demo day, many of which are attacking niches in truly innovative and disruptive ways.

While this mainly applies to startups and new business ventures, it's worth stating that it's possible to go too far when choosing a niche. For instance, while a website like WSO works wonders because its niche has broad appeal, one wouldn't necessarily want to go to a site that only targeted middle market investment banking analysts.

I'd argue that the same goes for many new companies that have been popping up lately. One company that presented at Y-Combinator's demo day, for instance, called imgfave, touts itself as a hybrid of Imgur and Reddit in hopes of becoming the place to "explore interesting images" and share them online. How this provides anything different or better than imgur, reddit, buzzfeed, tumblr, 4chan, 9gag, etc., I fail to see it.

___________________________________________________________________

Anyway. I hope some aspiring monkeys or budding entrepreneurs amongst us take this advice to heart and seek out a niche they can call their own.

 
Best Response

nestling into a niche too early on can be very dangerous

say ur a junior guy on a trading floor and decide to be on a desk trading certain types of exotic municipal derivatives and spend most of your time understanding that market inside and out and the mechanics of how they trade. that's great, right?

turns out thats a relatively idiosyncratic illiquid market, and when u decide to do something else, ppl aren't convinced that you've acquired much of any transferrable skills other than learning how to trade exotic municipal derivatives

theres a distinction between being good at ur job and nestling into a niche. if you cover the a&d sector, it is part of your job to understand that sector if u want to do well in your role. i dont see that as nestling into a niche really.

as a monkey, your focus should be becoming as versatile as possible by continually building a stockpile of transferrable skillz, not nestling into a nice cozy niche that can one day be wiped off the face of the map...while delving deep into things could be a part of doin your job well, your motive shouldn't be to find a niche to settle down in

i wonder what all those bustling throngs of CDO structurers are up to these days

 
<span class=keyword_link><a href=/resources/skills/finance/going-concern>Going Concern</a></span>:
nestling into a niche too early on can be very dangerous
+1 SB. I agree with this for the overwhelming majority of people. I consider myself a generalist even in my mid-thirties and have made a conscious decision to structure my career that way. Certainly, some people have done well by specializing into very narrow niches and in some ways, your perspective can shape whether you consider something a niche or not.

I consider Google fairly generalist...I would say that they help by finding global information easier, as opposed the niche of someone who helped sort information about mufflers on AMC cars built between 1967 - 1972.

At the boutique consulting from I work for, accepting and specializing in a niche is the only way to advance your career. In your first two years, you have work in a variety of industries, with companies of varying sizes (start-up to F500). However, after the initial two years, when it comes time for the first internal promotion, you have to declare an industry group as a niche. Although it segregates you, you have the opportunity of picking an industry that interests you and mastering it. I think it's a very effective structure.

 

One of the Tiger21 Scholars wrote a cs/2012/06/all_hail_the_generalist.html">piece for the Harvard Business Review that provides an insightful counter-perspective to this ideology.

The crux of his argument is simple:

The time has come to acknowledge expertise as overvalued. There is no question that expertise and hedgehog logic are appropriate in certain domains (i.e. hard sciences), but they certainly appear less fitting for domains plagued with uncertainty, ambiguity, and poorly-defined dynamics (i.e. social sciences, business, etc.).
Often it's the big picture thinker who engineers the solution that redefines the industry or process or business problem. Think of where the very phrase "Skate where the puck is going, not where it is now" originates from. As the author states, when it comes to bark, you can be the groove specialist, the cranny guy, the nook guy ... but if you're the guy who understands that bark is only the skin of the tree, that there are many layers to the tree, and that the tree is only one of countless others in the forest, you're going somewhere farther than the cranny guy.

Interesting approach.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Ducimus magni in ipsam inventore. Quia aut eos magnam consequatur necessitatibus saepe veritatis. Perspiciatis illum dicta consequatur ut. Excepturi aperiam enim ut. Architecto sunt quidem omnis voluptas qui consectetur.

Ut et aliquam omnis voluptatem. Autem ut id est quia recusandae. Ipsa tempore qui in consequatur accusamus doloribus eligendi. Ea fuga et veniam minima. Odit ducimus rem eum fuga voluptatem culpa aperiam fugit.

Perferendis enim aut minima at. Eos tempora placeat cumque recusandae explicabo sit et tenetur. Provident architecto sint voluptas. Esse aut et vel rerum adipisci autem. Perspiciatis ut excepturi omnis sit. Et nemo veniam nobis earum rem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”