Going from law firm to hedge or private equity fund

Hi,
Looking for insight as I'm trying to switch careers from law to finance. I have a good pedigree for law (ivy league undergrad and law school, worked at two top law firms for 6 years doing fund formation work), but don't have any investment banking experience. My (somewhat) relevant experience would be working at one of the largest investment firms for two years out of college doing financial reporting/investor relations, a CFA, and a very short stint as a distressed debt analyst for a family office.

I'm in my mid-30's. Have any of seen someone make this kind of move? If not, do you think it's remotely feasible?

Thanks!

How to Transition from Law to Finance

The transition from law to finance can be difficult, but it can be done. OPs top tier educational background, fund formation work and CFA charter should help him in securing introductions and phone calls. Some areas of finance may even view his law experience as an asset. WSO users offer this additional advice:

Transition to Another Group Within Firm
From Certified Private Equity Professional - Director @brandon st randy" :

I would try to move to the transaction advisory side of your law firm. As a top law firm you will likely get chances to work with major buyside clients as legal counsel on their acquisitions and buyout deals. From there you can take initiatives to actively get involved in working with clients directly and get acquainted with the PE/HF executives in the process. Once you get to know them well and if they like the works you put together for them then you can ask to transfer to their side. This is how the late Ted Ammon (RIP) made his transition from lawyer to KKR where he went on to make general partner.

Pursue Path that Values Law Background
From Certified Private Equity Professional – Partner @APAE" :

You could aim to continue on the distressed/special situations path. Many funds who employ this strategy value a legal background highly; if you look at the bios any of these funds have on their sites, it's always a bit surprising to see so many people who went to lower-ranked law programs, got into good law firms, and moved over to finance at some point. If you have an Ivy undergrad and Ivy law degree, I don't think you'd have trouble getting people to accept your phone call. How well that phone call goes, however, is going to be a function of how prepared you are (start now, there's an immense number of resources available) and how well you can sell your prior experience.

Issues to Consider
From Certified Hedge Fund Professional @on the road" :
I have made the switch. My brief background, in case it's helpful: good schools, transitioned very quickly out of law, spent a few years in non-IBD roles at well known banks (think GS/MS/JP), and then made a transition to hedge funds. There are a few layers of issues that you'll need to determine as you try to make a transition:

  • You'll need to have a rock-solid answer as to why you're leaving the law, particularly as a 6th/7th year. As long as it's a good story, you'll be fine, but it needs to be more than I don't think I'll make partner.
  • Since most buy-side shops don't have any formal training and expect you to hit the ground running, you'll need to show that you can conduct valuations/build models. Since you hold the CFA it'll be easier for you than most lawyers but you'll likely go through a case study of some sort so prepare yourself for that.
  • Beyond just the basic valuation/modeling skill-set, buy-side firms will want to know that you have an investor mindset (i.e., what's your investment process, how do you generate ideas, what makes something compelling for you, etc...). For example, examples from personal investing.
  • You'll need to determine if you want to be a PE investor or a HF investor. This is important b/c it'll force you to think about what type of investor you want to be, which in turn should make your job search more focused.
  • Given you're in your mid-30s, you'll also need to determine if you're willing to potentially take less money than you're making now since there is a very real possibility you won't make the same amount of money as you are now--at least the same amount of guaranteed money.
  • If you join a shop that has a few other investment analysts, chances are you will be much older than other analysts and know the least--psychologically that's a tough thing considering you're probably a very knowledgeable/experienced funds formation lawyer...basically are you ready to be uncomfortable for a bit while you get up to speed?
  • The biggest thing you can do is network. This is the single most powerful thing that helped me when I transitioned away from law. You're fortunate b/c you can tap into two great alumni networks. I would reach out to people shamelessly.

Recommended Reading

Want to improve your financial modeling skills?

Check out WSO’s side-by-side comparison of financial modeling courses and get a WSO discount.

Financial Modeling Course

 

I would try to move to the transaction advisory side of your law firm. As a top law firm you will likely get chances to work with major buyside clients as legal counsel on their acquisitions and buyout deals. From there you can take initiatives to actively get involved in working with clients directly and get acquainted with the PE/HF executives in the process. Once you get to know them well and if they like the works you put together for them then you can ask to transfer to their side. This is how the late Ted Ammon (RIP) made his transition from lawyer to KKR where he went on to make general partner.

Too late for second-guessing Too late to go back to sleep.
 
Best Response

I agree with the above. If you're at one of the BigLaw firms and can get on the transaction advisory side, if you get decent projects and develop relationships with any of your clients, you have a good shot at getting brought in-house. From what I understand from those of my friends who went to law school, these are the positions that are in vogue right now anyway, so your goal is also a goal many other people have as well.

Or, you could aim to continue on the distressed/special situations path. Many funds who employ this strategy value a legal background highly; if you look at the bios any of these funds have on their sites, it's always a bit surprising to see so many people who went to lower-ranked law programs, got into good law firms, and moved over to finance at some point. If you have an Ivy undergrad and Ivy law degree, I don't think you'd have trouble getting people to accept your phone call. How well that phone call goes, however, is going to be a function of how prepared you are (start now, there's an immense number of resources available) and how well you can sell your prior experience.

For the record, I think you're making the right move. I'm not in the industry, but it certainly seems to me that law is going through a structural downturn, not a cyclical one.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
APAE:

I agree with the above. If you're at one of the BigLaw firms and can get on the transaction advisory side, if you get decent projects and develop relationships with any of your clients, you have a good shot at getting brought in-house. From what I understand from those of my friends who went to law school, these are the positions that are in vogue right now anyway, so your goal is also a goal many other people have as well.

I was actually referring to him transitioning to the buyside as an investment professional, not legal/compliance personnel. While many practicing lawyers nowadays aim at transitioning to working as buy-side shops' in house attorneys, the recruitment process for those positions tend to be rather standardized with fixed number of available openings in each shop and is done via recruiters, HR etc.

What I have in mind is that, if the OP can proactively work with the client, come up with creative deal solutions and maybe even leverage his own personal connections to help the client source deals and come up with alternative deal angles and structures--in other words, go well above and beyond his limited duties as an outside legal counsel to add values and make money for the client, then he may quite likely impress some partners at a buyside shop, who will then vouch for the OP to bring him onboard. This is quite possible since the OP is an experienced professional who has been in the business for sometime as opposed to a recent law grad.

This way the OP can readily bypass the standard recruitment process and, depending on how well the partner thinks of him, may even join in directly at a more senior level like director and get to sit on the investment committee and boards of portfolio companies right away. The challenge with this approach is that, since the partner is bringing YOU (as opposed to a generic hire for an existing opening position) onboard for a very specific purpose, you really need to perform up to his/her expectations from day one. You are coming in as a proven deal expert so there will be no training program and you need to start utilizing your existing skill sets and industry relationships to add values to the firm from the get-go.

Too late for second-guessing Too late to go back to sleep.
 
brandon st randy:
APAE:

I agree with the above. If you're at one of the BigLaw firms and can get on the transaction advisory side, if you get decent projects and develop relationships with any of your clients, you have a good shot at getting brought in-house. From what I understand from those of my friends who went to law school, these are the positions that are in vogue right now anyway, so your goal is also a goal many other people have as well.

I was actually referring to him transitioning to the buyside as an investment professional, not legal/compliance personnel. While many practicing lawyers nowadays aim at transitioning to working as buy-side shops' in house attorneys, the recruitment process for those positions tend to be rather standardized with fixed number of available openings in each shop and is done via recruiters, HR etc.

What I have in mind is that, if the OP can proactively work with the client, come up with creative deal solutions and maybe even leverage his own personal connections to help the client source deals and come up with alternative deal angles and structures--in other words, go well above and beyond his limited duties as an outside legal counsel to add values and make money for the client, then he may quite likely impress some partners at a buyside shop, who will then vouch for the OP to bring him onboard. This is quite possible since the OP is an experienced professional who has been in the business for sometime as opposed to a recent law grad.

This way the OP can readily bypass the standard recruitment process and, depending on how well the partner thinks of him, may even join in directly at a more senior level like director and get to sit on the investment committee and boards of portfolio companies right away. The challenge with this approach is that, since the partner is bringing YOU (as opposed to a generic hire for an existing opening position) onboard for a very specific purpose, you really need to perform up to his/her expectations from day one. You are coming in as a proven deal expert so there will be no training program and you need to start utilizing your existing skill sets and industry relationships to add values to the firm from the get-go.

Notice how I outlined two options, one agreeing with you and the other proposing entering on the legal side?
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

I have made the switch. Though my legal background was not in fund formation, I am familiar with your work. My brief background, in case it's helpful: good schools, transitioned very quickly out of law, spent a few years in non-IBD roles at well known banks (think GS/MS/JP), and then made a transition to hedge funds.

There are a few layers of issues that you'll need to determine as you try to make a transition.

-You'll need to have a rock-solid answer as to why you're leaving the law, particularly as a 6th/7th year. As long as it's a good story, you'll be fine, but it needs to be more than I don't think I'll make partner.

-Since most buy-side shops don't have any formal training and expect you to hit the ground running, you'll need to show that you can conduct valuations/build models. Since you hold the CFA it'll be easier for you than most lawyers but you'll likely go through a case study of some sort so prepare yourself for that.

-Beyond just the basic valuation/modeling skill-set, buy-side firms will want to know that you have an investor mindset (i.e., what's your investment process, how do you generate ideas, what makes something compelling for you, etc...). The biglaw experience doesn't lend itself to honing this thought process so you'll need to have examples to show that you do have this mindset and are not solely focused on risk mitigation. For example, examples from personal investing.

-You'll need to determine if you want to be a PE investor or a HF investor. This is important b/c it'll force you to think about what type of investor you want to be, which in turn should make your job search more focused.

-Given you're in your mid-30s, you'll also need to determine if you're willing to potentially take less money than you're making now since there is a very real possibility you won't make the same amount of money as you are now--at least the same amount of guaranteed money. Additionally, if you join a shop that has a few other investment analysts, chances are you will be much older than that other analysts else and know the least--psychologically that's a tough thing considering you're probably a very knowledgeable/experienced funds formation lawyer...basically are you ready to be uncomfortable for a bit while you get up to speed? Lots of people have problems w/that as they get older/more established in their careers, so something to think about.

-My experience w/law firms is that by the time one is a senior associate, it's likely difficult to make a transition from a funds practice to M&A, bankruptcy, or other practice that might be more relevant to an investing career...Perhaps your firm is an exception? If you can make a practice group switch, obviously that doesn't hurt, but be sure to get into something that moves you closer (e.g., bankruptcy) and not something like generic capital markets.

-The biggest thing you can do is network. This is the single most powerful thing that helped me when I transitioned away from law. You're fortunate b/c you can tap into two great alumni networks. I would reach out to people shamelessly.

Happy to help w/specific questions.

 

i think your skill set would be more useful at private equity there are actually a couple people here at my PE firm who made the transition from law, and are probably more qualified and better workers than the other people here with different degrees

I'm not concerned with the very poor -Mitt Romney
 

Get PE transaction experience and then go to PE house, but again will be a challenge to shrug off the legal yoke and be a pure investment professional, or IMO more realistically a distressed debt HF where solid legal background is highly valued. You need to develop some ideas and pitch them though. And what was said before, network your balls off and try to find alumni that can give you some perspective, there must be some classmates / alumni who have done what you want to do. It is not impossible, even if it may be non-standard.

 

amazing. i just left another comment on a thread pretty similar to this one.

so youre pretty set on switching?

to give you an idea of the structure of typical PE firms and where you would fit in: some guys in the business model potential acquisitions and theyre typically from IB, some guys run and manage port co.s and usually have an operations or consulting background, some guys will be general council and those guys will obviously have a legal background etc etc. you get the point.

you would be the GC guy. sometimes PE firms outsource all legal, sometimes they have in-house council.

if i were you, i would stick to what you are doing and try to segue into a practice area that deals with PE. i know someone doing this right now and she meet a bunch of high-level PE guys. she has developed a nice Rolodex for herself. so work in PE and M&A law for a couple years, then you will have a valuable skill set that PE firms will be willing to pay for. that is your path of least resistance.

make sense?

--- man made the money, money never made the man
 

PE firms nut hard for credentials, degrees, etc. Your background should at least get you interviews. Start networking with the various alums at schools where you've received degrees.

I'm assuming the LLM would have been from NYU, Columbia, or GTown...

 

I would say that through Big Law transaction experience, you probably have developed some strong insight into way deals are structured, etc. However, at the more junior levels, you are relied on for analysis, modeling execution, etc. Do you have any financial experience (i.e. something with numbers)?

Even if you were to come in at a senior associate / vice president, you're still expected to be have a pretty strong grasp of the basic financial components of a deal. I know a bunch of guys in PE who have law degrees; they all have some IB experience.

I would say that it is probably easier to transfer to an investment bank from a law firm than a private equity shop, if you're looking to do more on the deal origination/execution side. In fact, I knew a bunch of ex-lawyers who became investment bankers.

 

I thought you were going to be working in IBD at a BB? (At least, that's if you're the same Kimbo Slice from XO.)

-------- Right now this is a job. If I advance any higher in this company, then this would be my career. And um... Well, if this were my career, I'd have to throw myself in front of a train.
 

Vel voluptatibus quod quis ratione temporibus. Autem asperiores aut nihil dolores perspiciatis.

Fuga cumque voluptatum numquam. Quaerat aut recusandae distinctio ut quasi alias. Aliquam nam nam nesciunt facilis. Est aspernatur nemo eius assumenda. Maxime accusamus non ut maxime ex veniam.

Eos praesentium vero deleniti minima rerum neque. Ducimus dolorum sapiente veritatis ut laborum ipsum. Culpa dolor nulla voluptatem quo. Reiciendis est et omnis. Vel atque ut recusandae aperiam dolor debitis et. Eum dolorem qui aperiam facilis similique consequatur.

Voluptatem delectus optio maiores ipsum nesciunt repellat fugiat. Odio quasi quam porro laborum sit. Omnis eligendi tenetur ex eos adipisci repudiandae. Id praesentium consequatur voluptatem quis autem ipsam nostrum. Eius alias et sed et labore id. Iure tempora voluptatibus temporibus dolores consequatur excepturi sequi. Ut reiciendis a minima est aperiam deleniti assumenda assumenda.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”