China Mainlining US Treasuries

They say the customer is always right, and when you're as dependent upon your "customers" as the US government is, I suppose it pays to offer top notch customer service. The US Treasury has entered into a first-ever direct-selling relationship with China, effectively allowing the Chinese to bypass Wall Street firms and purchase treasuries straight from the source.

It isn't costing primary dealers anything, but it is an interesting twist. And it helps to conceal what the Chinese are really doing with treasuries. Before you think I'm going all Zero Hedge on your asses, I simply mean that under the old primary dealer model the whole market knew how much and how many the Chinese were bidding for at a given auction. Now the Chinese could potentially get better executions because the market won't know exactly what they're up to.

It's also important to note that this only applies to treasury purchases and not sales. If and when the Chinese want to sell a treasury holding, they still have to go through a primary dealer.

The US Treasury has gone to considerable lengths to keep this new arrangement under wraps; they made no public announcement and didn't even inform the primary dealers. This is no doubt due to the controversial nature of the policy.

The granting to China of direct bidder status may be controversial because some government officials are concerned that China has gained too much leverage over the United States through its large Treasury holdings.


For example, economist Brad Setser, who is a member of the National Economic Council and has also served on the National Security Council, has argued China's large Treasury holdings pose a national security threat.


Writing for the Council on Foreign Relations in 2009, Setser posited that China's massive U.S. debt holdings gave it power over U.S. policy via the threat of a swift, large sale of U.S. debt that could send the market into turmoil and drive up interest rates.

So what do you think? Is this just good customer service, or is this the US government kowtowing to its largest creditor?

 

It's definitely more efficient to cut out the middle man. It's also a revealing insight into exactly how important this administration thinks Wall Street is, and this development should be closely monitered. This definitely puts more power into Chinese hands, but also allows for a greater coordination of policy between the U.S. and China: for better or for worse.

Anyone know how this will affect the currency exchange rate between us, if at all?

Get busy living
 
Best Response

I'm not sure what to think about this. On one hand it makes sense to allow China to do this because they are such a large buyer, however it is somewhat disconcerting to think that China has a direct link to the Treasury in that way. In some respects it would be nice to know how the Chinese are bidding but I guess it doesn't particularly matter as long as they keep taking down large batches of treasuries. I'm more concerned about the fact they went to great lengths to keep it from becoming public. I understand why but this is certainly something that should be out there.

Also, I was thinking about this. To some extent it may not be an awful idea that the Chinese can exert an inordinate amount of pressure on the US about fiscal policy. Considering we are unable to swallow the tough pills ourselves or accept solutions to our fiscal woes, maybe having an large unemotional voice with a large (huge) vested interest in our long term fiscal stability isn't a bad thing. Maybe it would force us to examine our own issues and at the very least take action just so we don't have to be coerced by China. I'm not saying I approve of China having any say whatsoever in what we do but it seems to me maybe that is what is needed to get the clown show in Washington to act.

 
Addinator37:
Considering we are unable to swallow the tough pills ourselves or accept solutions to our fiscal woes, maybe having an large unemotional voice with a large (huge) vested interest in our long term fiscal stability isn't a bad thing.

That's the line I'm taking right now. Overall, I'm not sure how worried I am about the Chinese holding so much of our debt, it might not be great long term for America, but we'll be getting what we deserve if it's really as bad as some people think.

I might have to follow Jim Rogers over to Asia if we don't pull our heads out of the sand. I think we're getting into "beggars can't be choosers" territory with our fiscal recklessness.

 
Addinator37:
I'm not sure what to think about this. On one hand it makes sense to allow China to do this because they are such a large buyer, however it is somewhat disconcerting to think that China has a direct link to the Treasury in that way. In some respects it would be nice to know how the Chinese are bidding but I guess it doesn't particularly matter as long as they keep taking down large batches of treasuries. I'm more concerned about the fact they went to great lengths to keep it from becoming public. I understand why but this is certainly something that should be out there.

Also, I was thinking about this. To some extent it may not be an awful idea that the Chinese can exert an inordinate amount of pressure on the US about fiscal policy. Considering we are unable to swallow the tough pills ourselves or accept solutions to our fiscal woes, maybe having an large unemotional voice with a large (huge) vested interest in our long term fiscal stability isn't a bad thing. Maybe it would force us to examine our own issues and at the very least take action just so we don't have to be coerced by China. I'm not saying I approve of China having any say whatsoever in what we do but it seems to me maybe that is what is needed to get the clown show in Washington to act.

they've already got out of the long end of the curve and are cutting back on the short end. this is a form of "power" that they don't really want.

 

Thanks for posting this Eddie... Very interesting.

I wonder if keeping Wall Street (and the public) in the dark about amount of Chinese buying is something policy-makers sought by this move and not just a by-product of the decision. Would opacity help the issuer in this case?

One thing is certain, sales guys now have a standard excuse to go to when stumped by a client's questions "it's probably the Chinese"....

 

Dolorem dolor quae amet blanditiis. Cum sunt vero voluptates voluptatem in. Recusandae dolorum soluta est ea aut non voluptatibus. Cupiditate nihil sint quia tempore omnis. Voluptatum illo qui consequuntur unde facilis non. Exercitationem dolore occaecati temporibus laborum quidem dicta. Consequatur aut velit asperiores tempore debitis rem et hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”