## Pages

So it seems that there are some math people around. To follow up on http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/harder-brainteaser-than-the-coin-flip here is another one:

Given:

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

Show that:

a+b=c+d

Requires middle school math, but sure can ruin an interview.

As before, SBs for 1st correct answer.

Edit - all numbers are strictly positive. Apologies for confusion, but the problem remains open.

Edit - To provide an update, this has, thus far, been proven in 1 confirmed way by nonTargetChimp 9 (see his text file proof), and also in 1 more way that appears correct by unForseen (or rather by a friend of unForseen that works in HR). Another proof using trigonometry has been proposed and has not been fully evaluated but could be correct, and blastoise tried to prove this using fancy linear algebra but so far that proof does not appear to be correct, since he was able to prove it ignoring the positive constraint, meaning he proved something that is false. The most elegant solution to date, in my opinion, would have to be the HR rep's as presented by unForseen, which is found on page 8.

Background on the problem - came from an 8th grade city level math competition from the late 1960s at a mathematical school in the USSR.

Popular Content

- WSO Investment Banking Resume Template for College Students Released to the Public!Big Announcement: WSO Resume Template is Out in the Wild!: Mod Note (Andy): If you're looking for our resume for experienced IB professionals or a private equity resume template, click here.. For those of you looking to make sure your CV format is clean and make sure that your...
- Are you experienced? Thoughts on growing olderIt’s been awhile since I’ve checked in on WSO. I hope 2016 has treated you all well and you’re now settling in for some well deserved rest and relaxation time over the course of the holidays. It may just be selection bias given I’m starting to get a little older myself (I just turned...
- Ask Natalie from Accepted about Business School AdmissionsWSO is excited to have the experts from Accepted on board to answer applicant questions in the business school forum. Here are messages from Natalie and Jen who will be checking this thread every few days: Natalie I'm here to answer any questions you have regarding Business School...
- 2017 Management Consulted Salaries OutWhat do you think? Just like last year, PwC and Strategy& are still not aligned. https://managementconsulted.com/consulting-salaries/2017-management-consulting-salaries-for-undergraduate-mba-interns/
- Off The Beaten Path: Commercial Banking to Private Equity (The Non-Traditional Route)Hey everyone. The ink has just barely dried on my accepted offer to join a boutique private equity firm as an analyst, but I think now is a better time than any to tell you how I made the jump to private equity from a VERY non-target background. A little bit about me: I graduated from a...
- How I Taught Some Kid a LessonHappy Boxing Day all you hosers and tea-sipping limeys. Here in America I've been back at work since late afternoon yesterday. Markets may be closed, but I woke up Christmas morning unaided by stims and I chose to head into the office as soon as my family left so that boss man could see me...
- Ask an experienced senior analyst anythingSo I'm feeling a bit generous over the holidays. So have at it kids, ask away. Straight-dope answers will be provided.
- Ask a bro: Thebrofessor's AMA, 2016 editionAlright everyone, I need something to distract me from family time over the next few days, so wanted to do a AMA. Background for those who don't already know: partner in a PWM practice at one of the bigger firms (MS/ML/UBS) managing $500mm in the southeast US. worked at a local bank for...
- Day in the Life--Middle Office (Risk)Congrats, you've made it into finance...in the middle office. What is the middle office? Definitions vary, but think risk management, certain accounting roles, corporate treasury--broadly speaking, you interact with the business divisions on externally-related (i.e. client, funding) topics,...
- Universal Basic IncomeFinland has started a new program where it gives a basic income to all of its citizens. In theory, this sounds wonderful because even those without a job will have some basic sustenance. Maybe this can only work because the country has a small population. What do you guys think of this new...

Forum Topics

- Student looking to learn: Commodity TradingHello Everyone, I am a student a trying to figure out what specific career path I would like to go down. I have read some basic commodity trading stuff and was wondering the best place (firms and...
- Competency interviewsI am consistently rejected after first round, competency based, telephone or video interviews. I am passionate about the markets, the industry and trading, and I have successfully traded on my own...
- Pure math PhD to go for consulting or quant job?Hi all! I'm just over halfway through my PhD in pure maths, and have always envisioned myself as going for a career in academia. Unfortunately, a physical illness and a subsequent depression has...
- AI's Affect on ComplianceRecently read an interesting article regarding the future for those who work in "back office" roles", especially in compliance. According to this article, big banks, such as HSBC, Deutsche Bank, and...
- IB Interview w/ Gravitas Securities (Canadian Boutique)Hey guys, I recently got an IB Analyst interview for Gravitas Securities which is a Canadian Boutique firm. Does anyone have any information on the interviews they conduct? Or if anyone has gone...
- Apitgon Interview Process / Culture / Strategy / etc. Hey all - Managed to score an interview at Aptigon in the coming weeks. Given the fund's recent move to Citadel's platform I haven't been able to find much info on its interview process, culture, etc...
- Some Thoughts on Bitcoin, Part 1I haven't written about Bitcoin on WSO for a long time, and I've seen a lot of questions about it on the site over the past few weeks due to the recent price movements. There's a lot to cover so this...
- Bank of America Q4 2016 Earnings $BAC posted a 46.75% increase in 4Q16 earnings, helped by higher revenue, expense management and creation of operating leverage. Net income for the quarter rose 46.75% to $4.33Bil or $0.40 per share...
- Will be in NY in a few weeks for a conference and work, how should I network?I'll be in New York for a conference in a few weeks, and while I'm there the plan is I'll be meeting some firms for work during the time/days I'm not at the conference (currently setting some of...
- Administrators reports for inclusion in Board meeting Hello everyone! can anyone please explain what are the exact reports for Prepare Administrators reports for inclusion in Board meeting in fund services ? Many thanks
- "Buying your network"I recently came across this during my job search and am not sure how I feel about it. What are your thoughts on companies "buying your network" meaning they are looking to hire you solely on the...
- Study Abroad LSE vs Transferring to a Target SchoolI'm currently a sophomore at a liberal arts (read: very non-target) college. I'm an economics/computer science double major, female. I have the opportunity to go to LSE for a year-long study abroad...
- Any info on Jonathan Rose Companies?Im looking for information and input on Jonathan Rose Companies. can anyone give me give me some insight on the company?
- trading the newsHey monkeys: So, I'm seriously considering S&T, particularly trading in something like a hedgefund or prop trading as a career path. I only have one problem. Well, let me put it this way--I have...
- Your worst work experiences Curious to hear some of your stories with firms in your career in the RE industry. I'm sure a lot of you had worked at small firms where it might have been a cluster fuck or you got hoodwinked into a...

Upcoming Events

- Jan 15 2017 (All day) to Jan 16 2017 (All day)
- Jan 16 2017 (All day) to Jan 17 2017 (All day)
- Jan 18 2017 (All day) to Jan 20 2017 (All day)
- Jan 18 2017 - 7:00pm to 8:00pm
- Jan 19 2017 - 7:30pm to 9:30pm

## Comments (399)

Just divide the 2nd equation by the first it's really simple.

(a^3 + b^3)/(a^2 + b^2) = (c^3 +d^3)/(c^2+b^2) <=> a+b=c+d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

No such luck.

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28a^3+%2B+b^3%29%2F%28a^2+%2B+b^2%29

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Fail.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Your math is retarded. I guess you're ... a banker ?

Nobody wants to work for it anymore. There's no honor in taking the after school job at Mickey D's. Honor's in the dollar, kid.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I just realized how stupid my answer was.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

why can't I just square root the 2nd equation? That's whats throwing me off right now. Are you sure the question doesn't ask you to find what a b c d are?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You can "square root" a perfect square, only. The question is correct as it is.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Take the square root of each variable?

I eat success for breakfast...with skim milk

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

doesn't work that way (a^2 + b^2)^1/2 doesn't equal a+b

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Re-write 2nd equation as:

a^2 . a + b^2 . b = c^2 . c + d^2 . d

then divide it by 1st equation and end up with a+b = c+d ? lol

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

My guess (disclaimer: I am not mathematically inclined):

Since we have a ^2 and a ^3, it gives us enough information to eliminate any uncertainty around whether a, b, c, or d is negative or positive. Plug in positive and negative numbers, and you should be able to tell that as long as it satisfies the two equations above, a+b will always equal to c+d.

We wouldn't be able to make that assumption if we were only given a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2, because that tells us nothing about the +/- sign of each number, and you can't safely say a + b = c + d.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Your intuition may be correct but it is certainly not a proof.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I fail as well.

Under my tutelage, you will grow from boys to men. From men into gladiators. And from gladiators into SWANSONS.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

SB for the chuckle

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Math Proofs....

HUMBUG!!!Get busy living

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

WHOOPS, edited...

a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

SO

a^2 + b^2 = a^2 + b^2

AND

a^3 + b^3 = a^3 + b^3

THEREFORE

a^x b^x = a^x b^x

SO

a^1 b^1 = a^1 + b^1

AND

a + b = a + b = c + d

a + b = c + d

Or something like that. Apparently, a 5th grader is smarter than me.

Get busy living

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Given:

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

just guessing:

FIRST EQUATION, REWRITTEN: (a^2+b^2)=(c^2+d^2)

SECOND EQUATION, FACTORED OUT: (a+b)(a^2 + b^2) = (c+d)(c^2 + d^2); Distributive Property

substitute right side of first equation into left side of 2nd equation:

(a+b)(c^2 + d^2) = (c+d)(c^2 + d^2) ; Substitution Method

divide both sides by (c^2 + d^2),

and end up with (a+b) = (c+d)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

My GMAT level math tells me that's...kind of not right.

(a+b)(a^2 + b^2) = (c+d)(c^2 + d^2) does not equal a^3 + b^3 = c^3 + d^3.

I also don't get UFO's thing and how that proves a + b = c + d.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

function yoFuckThisShit(www, forum, topic, x)

{

do while x > 0

{

yoFuckThisShit('WSO', 'monkeyingaround', 'Do You Know Algebra?', x)

msgBox.Display ('This shows college and grueling engineering psets didn't prep me for shit', alert);

x++

}

}

init_app()

{

this.yoFuckThisShit ('WSO', 'monkeyingaround', 'Do You Know Algebra?', 1);

}

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

this doesn't compile. weird.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

this doesn't compile. weird.[/quote]

Wtf are you trying to do, showing off that you can program at 101 level ?

Nobody wants to work for it anymore. There's no honor in taking the after school job at Mickey D's. Honor's in the dollar, kid.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Wtf are you trying to do, showing off that you can program at 101 level ?[/quote]

take it easy and stop being so uptight. it was just me fucking around. go out and have a beer. you seem stressed out from life.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

LOL you tried compiling it? i didnt even say which language.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^3 + b^3 does not equal (a+b)(a^2 + b^2)

(a+b)(a^2 + b^2) equals a^3 + 2ab^2 + b^3

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

no it doesnt.

a+b(a^2 + b^2) = a^3 + ba^2 + ab^2 + b^ 3

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

The above two corrections are correct (and necessary). Also, all material here is within the scope of the GMAT, so if you prefer, think of it as a data sufficiency question:

Is a+b=c+d?

(1) a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

(2) a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

yeah my bad. i was thinking about (a+b)^3 lol

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Should I really embarrass everyone by doing this right now?

I'll tell you what, I solve this and someone gives me back the 1000 I just lost today on First Solar Calls

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Please embarrass everyone by doing this right now.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I give up do it

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

haha do it. im curious. i like these math threads. shows how much of an idiot we can all be sometimes :D

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You have only had 6 pages of examples (right or wrong) to help you. Please bestow your genius upon me.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I'm with Will I'm sure he did it the way I did it. Many people got burned for the sheer fact you need more than just regular algebra to make a simple proof.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Word. A solution does not equal a proof. You can easily manipulate # into your said proof to make it hold true, which is where myself went wrong. I need to look over WH proof TBH.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I am not with Will on this one.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

C,

let a = 1 b = -1 c = 1 d = 1

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2 holds true

a+b=c+d is not equal

let a = 1 b = 1 c = 1 d = 1

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2 holds true

a+b=c+d is equal

1 is insufficient

same logic applies to 2

Only when combining can you lock down the sign so C

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Well you have proven its not A, B or D but you haven't really proven C.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Lol hoping you overlooked that

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

That's what I was trying to say in my post with the whole plugging of the numbers thing and picking positive/negative signs.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You guys realise that A^3+B^3 = (A+B )(A^2+B^2 - AB) right? not (A+B)(A^2+B^2) like i saw someone above doing

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

yeah i realized that too late lol. fail.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

somebody go do it the long brute way, if this isn't a data sufficiency question:

first equation becomes (a + b)^2 - 2ab = (c + d)^2 - 2cd

then, (a+b)^2 = (c+d)^2 - 2(ab + cd)

and, a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = sqrt((c+d)^2 - 2(ab + cd))

second equation: (a + b) (a^2 - ab + b^2) = (c + d) (c^2 - cd + d^2)

plug all that crap in, solve, then plug in some more and get a+b = c+d but i'm too lazy to do it.

of course there's a shorter way but im an idiot today :D

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

plug all that crap in, solve, then plug in some more and see what you get

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

shhhhh. im trying to make someone go through all that.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Let me give it a shot.

First, a^3 + b^3 = (a+b)(a^2 - ab + b^2) = (a+b)(c^2 - ab + d^2) [since a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2].

Now, we know that a^3 + b^3 = c^3 + d^3, and so

(a+b)(c^2 - ab + d^2) = (c+d)(c^2 - cd + d^2)

For (a+b) = (c+d), we must show that ab = cd (this is a necessary condition).

If a+b = c+d, then

(a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2

(c+d)^2 = c^2 + 2cd + d^2

But we already know that a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2, and so 2ab = 2cd. Hence if a+b = c+d (and our conditions hold) then ab = cd.

I don't know about you guys, but I have a life + work to do so if its wrong, so be it.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Well you are the first one on the right track. You have shown that proving a+b=c+d is equivalent to proving ab=cd, which is correct. However, in proving 2ab=2cd, you implicitly assumed a+b=c+d, hence you proved that if a+b=c+d, then a+b=c+d, which is redundant. However, thanks for bringing a hint of actual math to this thread.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I'm pretty sure for the next part I have to cross multiply the two equations and show that ab = cd, but man what the hell I don't have time for this shit

Sorry about the redundant proof, I felt bad typing it in

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

The reason I posted this is that the actual proof is quite elegant and non-trivial, and cross-multiplying doesn't come close to cutting it. It's a good problem to solve in boring classes.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Also, I just showed that if a+b = c+d, I will get this result because

(a+b)^2 = (c+d)^2, and a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I asked a math Phd at Stanford to do it (I can do it but wanted to see how easy it would be for him) and he said FUCK THAT IM NOT FACTORING ALL DAY. LOL

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Factoring will not be sufficient here. You keep saying you can do it - we are all waiting with SBs in hand.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I think he meant factorization. Anyway, I will solve it once I get out of class and have time to type.

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Is this doable by direct proof?

Or do we have to do RAA or something? When we get to the part where we have to show ab=cd

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You know, maybe, sort of. Something in the middle.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

does it require using imaginary numbers, as in a^2 + b^2 = (a+bi)(a-bi)?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

No

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Dr. Joe you're such a tease.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

This is probably stupid, but I go to a nontarget so give me abreak.

take the natural log of everything thus:

2lna + 2lnb = 2lnc + 2lnd

divde by 2

lna + lnb = lnc +lnd

raise e^ln. thus

a + b = c + d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Look up log of sum formula. Also, you failed to use the cubic equation, hence any result can't be sufficient.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

8---------------D (|) ratio in this thread is mean 0

Where I unload on Twits and take verbal S***s

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

+a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

= a^2(1+a)+b^2(1+b)=c^2(1+c)+d^2(1+d)

and then somehow you eliminate a^2, b^2, c^2, d^2 through some bullshit because a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2, leaving (1+a)+(1+b)=(1+c)+(1+d), so a+b=c+d eliminating the ones...

Am I on the right track?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Not at all. Sorry.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Apparently the answer is no.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I got this on a math test once in high school. Me being the smart ass that I am wrote this.

Since we have 4 undefined variables I can assign any numeric value that I want to each of the variables. Therefore a,b,c,d = 1. Having set the numeric value of the variables. a+b=c+d. I acutally got full credit on that problem because the teacher had not designated that a,b,c,d are not all equal to one another.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays

Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I haven't solved the problem (it doesn't look that easy to me), but if this indeed is similar to most complex GMAT problems, you likely need to manipulate one of the formulas (likely the 2nd) in a way that allows you to use the first formula. For example, if you reduced a^3 + b^3 in a way that isolated (a^2+b^2), you could then replace a^2+b^2 with c^2+d^2 and work the formula from there. If that doesn't work, perhaps manipulate BOTH formulas...

I could be wrong, but some food for thought for those that are tackling this.

CompBanker

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I've gone through this a few times now and each time I end up proving myself wrong.

Can we set a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2 = 1

and a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3 = 1

such that ac + bd = 0?

IFF this is true we need:

bc-ad = ?

So multiply (by c^2 + d^2) on both sides:

(a^2 + b^2)*(c^2 + d^2) = c^2 + d^2

(ac)^2 + (ad)^2 + (bc)^2 + (bd)^2 = 1

(ac + bd)^2 - 2acbd + (bc-ad)^2 +2abcd = 1

We know that ac + bd= 0

- 0 -2abcd + (bc-ad)^2 + 2abcd= 1

Now reduce similar terms:

- (bc-ad)^2 = 1

- bc - ad = 1

or:

- bc - ad = -1

accept this approach ignores the second equation.

(I love this stuff even when Im wrong)

Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art - Andy Warhol

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I am not sure I follow what you are doing above - and as you admit, without using the 2nd equation, a solution is not possible. Your 1st assumption that everything is equal to 1 is also overly constricting. .

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

come on monkeys...don't make Fermat shift in his grave.LOL

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a2+b2=c2+d2

a2-c2 = d2-b2

(a+c)(a-c) = (d+b)(d-b)

Do the same with a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

then you get

a+c = d+b

and

a2 + ac + c2 = d2 + bd + b2

Sqaure both sides of

a+c = d+b

you get

ac = bd

substract a2 + ac + c2 = d2 + bd + b2 times 3

you get

a - c = d -b

a + b = c + d

(my math -> english is pretty horrible)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I don't follow what you did with the cubes to get a+c=d+b

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Say, in what domain are we solving this? I'll assume the reals, then the assumptions do not hold.

Take the way less general a=1, b=1.

c^2+d^2=2

c^3+d^3=2

So your assumption would imply that c+d=2, but one can find other c and d that solve the above system. Let u=c+d, so from the second:

(c+d)(c^2+d^2-cd)=2

u(2-cd)=2

cd=2-(2/u)

then adding twice to the first equation

c^2+2cd+d^2=2+4-(4/u)

u^2=6-(4/u)

u^3-6u+4=0

As expected, one solution is u=c+d=1+1=2. But the other roots

u(u-2)(u+2)-2u+4=0

(u-2)(u^2+2u-2)=0

are the roots of the quadratic:

u^2+2u-2=0

and those are -1+or-sqrt(3)

So, c+d can be equal to those numbers, and not just to 2=1+1=a+b.

For example:

c=(a+sqrt(a^2+4a))/2

d=(a+sqrt(a^2+4a))/2

where a=-1+sqrt(3)

one of the roots of the quad.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Sorry, don't have time right now to analyze line-by-line but the real domain is a fine assumption. But the last lines there suggest that c=d=/=1. However, I think its silly to argue that if c=d and a=b then the proposition doesn't hold -> you would have to imply that if 2a^2=2b^2 and 2a^3=2b^3 then a doesn't have to equal b, which is clearly absurd. I think you made a sign error somewhere, which, when resolved, will eliminate the contradiction, and the possibility of alternate solutions.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I (master of fin mathematics), and a team member (PhD. in Mathematics) stand by the above analysis. We want to be proved wrong, however....

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Was I correct in inferring that c=d in your example? if so, how do you disprove my argument above for the absurdity of the results?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

what wadtk has shown is that if a=b=1 and assuming

c^2+d^2=2

and c^3 +d^3 = 2

then c+d = 2, 1+sqrt(3), 1-sqrt(3)

this proves than c+d is not necessarily equal to a+b and therefore proves that a+b = c+d is not always true even if c^2 + d^2 = a^2 + b^2

and c^3+d^3 = a^3 +b^3 are true

So the problem is not provable as it is not true!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I was wondering this same thing

Is there a math expert here who can give a definitive answer??

Get busy living

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Oh sh*t, it's going to be a showdown. MATH WARRRR!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Too bad Will Hunting hasn't proved his self proclaimed math superiority.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

President, you are assuming that xy = ab ==> x= a and y = b. This is not true.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

U can proof it by simple induction, assuming positive integers. Look at your solutions of the 1st and 2nd equation. Reformulate them for i and i+1. Get rid of the i-th roots by taking all of it to the power of i. Then set a^i+b^i=c^i+d^i, plug in your solutions and u'll end up with 3a^i+3b^i=3c^i+3d^i and you're done. Also works for i+1...i+n. Should work at first sight, but no clue how to do it GMAT style ;)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^2+b^2 = (a+b)^2

c^2+d^2= (c+d)^2

sqrt(a+b)^2= sqrt(c+d)^2

a+b=c+d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Another high-school flunk out. Next..

Nobody wants to work for it anymore. There's no honor in taking the after school job at Mickey D's. Honor's in the dollar, kid.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

the problem does not hold for n^2; n>2 if abcd are all integers.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I actually lol at this and everyone was looking at me "wtf"?

@ Dr. Joe - is this some form of a diophantine equation? Maybe a hint is in order as apparently we are all too retarded to find a proof.

Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art - Andy Warhol

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I believe wadtk has shown it to be unprovable, can anyone find a flaw in his/her reasoning?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I didn't do the excercise on paper. Just did some thinking about it, and if u look at my reasoning of above: if you follow it by induction, it should hold true for positive numbers. Looking at the generalized solutions of Eq. (1) or Eq. (2) you will get the roots with a negative sign, where wadtk is definitly right. Prooving it true for negative numbers shouldn't be possible.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

This gave me a headache.

Most people do things to add days to their life. I do things to add life to my days.Browse my blog as a WSO contributing author## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

My bad folks - all numbers are positive. For what it's worth, the example above was correct in that a possibility is A=1 B=1 C= -0.564579 D=1.296630. But all numbers are strictly positive.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

It's ok, you got many people thinking about mathematics which is hall of fame in my book.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

President is wrong, you don't get a+c = b+d, all you get is that

(a^2+ac+c^2)/(a+c ) = (b^2+bd+d^2)/(b+d)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

okay so this isn't really that bad...

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

But the problem remains open...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

think of c^2+d^2 as u

then a^2+b^2=u

then a, b, and radical u form a right triangle.

so use a triple like 3,4,5

a=3 b=4 and radical u=5

well if a=3 then a^2=9 and if b=4 then b^2=16 and radical u^2=25

radical u^2 is also equal to just "u" which is equal to c^2+d^2

so c^2+d^2=25

which makes sense because 9+16 = 25

no repeat the process with c,d, and 5 as a triangle.

you get c=3 and d=4

hence a+b=c+d

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

cold pizza, you have no knowledge of formal mathematical proofs, taking specific values is not a fucking proof.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Wtf is this shit, don't make any sense at all. Go back to high school pizza boy.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

here's a proof:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Proof that you're retarded

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

lol

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

how about this:

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

say c^2+d^2 = z^2

so a^2+b^2 = z^2

then a, b, and z form a triangle where z is the hypotenuse

and c, d, and z form the same triangle. because if z=z and it is a right triangle according to pythagorean theorem, then the other sides are the same as well

still no good?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Hey buddy how about you try using the second output a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

Nevermind it won't make any difference..

Troll ?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Why don't you solve it for us all then, fucking genius?

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Ok, Sir.

Typing this is a pain so I will make (a2) = a^2

a2 + b2 = c2 + d2

=> (a2 + b2)^3 = (c2 + d2)^3

a6 + 3(a4)(b2) + 3(a2)(b4) + b6 = c6 + 3(c4)(d2) + 3(c2)(d4) + d6 (1)

a3 + b3 = c3 + d3

=> (a3 + b3)^2 = (c3 + d3)^2

a6 + 2(a3)(b3) + b6 = c6 + 2(c3)(d3) + d6 (2)

(1) - (2)

3(a4)(b2) + 3(a2)(b4) - 2(a3)(b3) = 3(c4)(d2) + 3(c2)(d4) - 2(c3)(d3)

a2b2(3a2 + 3b2 - 2ab) = c2d2(3c2 + 3d2 - 2cd)

Let ab = u, cd = v, a2 + b2 = c2 + d2 = k

So (u^2)(3k - 2u) = (v^2)(3k - 2v)

3k(u^2) - 2(u^3) = 3k(v^2) - 2(v^3)

3k(u^2 - v^2) - 2(u^3 - v^3) = 0

3k(u-v)(u+v) - 2(u-v)(u^2 + uv + v^2) = 0 (3)

Okay so:

Scenario 1: u - v = 0 => u = v => ab = cd. Done

Scenario 2: u - v =/= 0

Divide both sides of (3) by (u-v)

3k(u+v) -2(u^2 + uv + v^2) = 0

3k = -2(u^2 + uv + v^2)/(u+v)

3k = 3(a^2 + b^2) > 0

u^2 + uv + v^2 > 0

u + v = ab + cd > 0 (since a,b,c,d > 0)

=> Scenario 2 is impossible

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

nice!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You forgot to change the sign in the following step:

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

missed that...

still waiting on a proof!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You're right. Let me fix that

3k(u+v) - 2(u^2 + uv + v^2) = 0

Let u + v = s, uv = p

3k.s - 2.(s^2 - p) = 0

-2.s^2 + 3k.s + 2p = 0 (

))Consider s the variable, recall that s = u + v = ab + cd > 0. So we need a positive solution for (

delta = 9.k^2 + 16.p > 0 (4)

Product of the two solutions = - 2.2p = -4. p < 0 (5)

So we definitely have at least one positive solution for (

), because (4) shows that we have 2 solutions for () and (5) shows that the two solutions have reverse signs. So scenario (2) is definitely possible.Which leads to the conclusion that...

- Dr. Joe, your inputs are wrong again

- Troll !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Haha if true, this would be some good trolling lol.

But its not. Remember, if you think it doesn't hold, proving that you are right is very easy. Simply provide a set of values that prove me wrong. Proving that it does hold is (evidently) much tougher.

I am having trouble digging into your proof because I gave you a b c d and your proof about a b c d is expressed in terms of u, v, t, s, p, and k.

Perhaps its time for a hint.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

This kind of trolling deserves capital punishment in a Nerdsville bro :)

Finding a numerical solution that can disprove your thesis might be out of my reach. You did not really prove me wrong though.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Yeah I know I didn't prove you wrong. But the thing is that your "conclusion" is that I am wrong. To prove your conclusion wrong, I would have to prove myself right. Which would mean posting a solution.

That being said, I am not sure your logic is all that sound in this instance. I understand your argument as "If Z=/=0, then I can divide through by it. However, if this later results in a contradiction, then Z=0 because the contradiction came from somewhere." What you have done thus far is that you have not found a contradiction, and concluded that since no contradiction, then Z=/=0. However, as you know, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and proving the system consistent would require going back to a b c d, which would be equivalent of finding a numerical solution.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Okay, you're right, my proof might not be definitive yet, even I myself might be lost among the variables that I created. I could run an Excel model (yup that is the end of my technical competency) to (maybe) find a numerical solution but I don't have time right now.

Btw is your proof short and elegant ?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Providing description of the proof may be equivalent to giving a hint. PM me if interested - don't want to post hints here. Unless you guys want them...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

why do i need to use the second output if i can solve it with one?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

We know that: a^3+b^3 = c^3+d^3

Rewrite the equation so that it takes the form: (a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab) = (c+d)(c^2+d^2-cd) ---> call this equation 1

Now, if we can show that (a^2+b^2-ab)=(c^2+d^2-cd) then we will be able to divide them out of the equation, leaving us with our desired result, (a+b)=(c+d). So

Prove: (a^2+b^2-ab) = (c^2+d^2-cd) ----> call this equation 2

We know a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2, from the problem statement. We could subtract this value from both sides to show -ab = -cd and thus (a^2+b^2-ab)=(c^2+d^2-cd), but to show the step more clearly, let us say that:

k = (a^2+b^2) = (c^2+d^2)

plugging k into equation 2 yields: k-ab = k-cd

subtract k from both sides: -ab = -cd

Therefore, since (a^2+b^2) = (c^2+d^2) and -ab = -cd, we have proven that

(a^2+b^2-ab) = (c^2+d^2-cd). We could stop here, but to explicate it further, let j = (a^2+b^2-ab) = (c^2+d^2-cd).

Plug j into equation 1:

(a+b)(a^2+b^2-ab) = (c+d)(c^2+d^2-cd)

becomes

(a+b)(j) = (c+d)(j).

Divide by j.

(a+b) = (c+d).

QED, that's our proof.

I'll be here all week, feel free to leave tips or better yet, job offers.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I had the same thought process, but I haven't figured out how to prove ab=cd which is the core of this proof. You should check that part of your answer because it looks like an obvious circular argument to me.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

yup this just needs a proof that ab=cd and it would work.

Money Never Sleeps? More like Money Never SUCKS amirite?!?!?!?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

^very nice

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Nope. Equation 2 is what you need to prove but you use it to prove your conclusion.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Ouch, I just realized what I did. Give me a few minutes; I think I can get it.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Here's my attempt:

a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

take the difference of the equations

(a^3-a^2)+(b^3-b^2)=(c^3-c^2)+(d^3-d^2)

for all positive integers, n^3-n^2=k is only true for n. So for that equation to be true, either a=c&b=d or a=d&b=c or a=b=c=d----->therefore a+b=c+d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Not limited to integers

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Do we need to show "n^3-n^2=k is only true for n" more rigorously?

I could buy it, but I'm not sure without seeing a proof.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I guess n

nn-n*n = kturns to

n = k/n*n +1

so just one solution.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^3+b^3 = c^3+d^3

a^3+b^3 = ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a)

c^3+d^3 = cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a) = cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

a^2+b^2 = c^2+d^2

a^2+b^2 = ab (a/b +b/a)

c^2+d^2 = cd (c/d +d/c)

ab (a/b +b/a) = cd (c/d +d/c)

so, we got:

ab (a/b +b/a) = cd (c/d +d/c)

and

ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a) = cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

then

[ab (a/b +b/a) ] / (c/d +d/c) = cd

and

[ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a] / ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c) = cd

so

[ab (a/b +b/a) ] / (c/d +d/c) = [ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a] / ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

ab cancels out

(a/b +b/a) / (c/d +d/c) = [((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a] / ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

let's say this entire thing = Z

so going back...

[ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a] / ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c) = cd = abZ

Do the same thing with:

ab (a/b +b/a) = cd (c/d +d/c)

and

ab ((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a) = cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)

to solve for ab

SO:

ab = [cd (c/d +d/c)] / (a/b +b/a)

ab = [cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)] / [((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a)]

cd (c/d +d/c)] / (a/b +b/a) = [cd ((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)] / [((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a)]

cd cancels out

(c/d +d/c)] / (a/b +b/a) = [((c^2)/d +(d^2)/c)] / [((a^2)/b +(b^2)/a)]

let's say this entire thing equals Y

so going back...

ab = cdY

now we have

ab=cdY and abZ=cd

cdY = cd/Z

cdYZ = cd

YZ=1

multiply both equations

ab * cd = cdY * abZ

SO ****************ab = cd ************

that shit is long though lol

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

ab = cd

going back to:

ab (a/b +b/a) = cd (c/d +d/c) - which came from the first equation

ab and cd cancel out

(a/b +b/a) =(c/d +d/c)

let's take out b and d

so b (a + 1/a) = d (c +1/c)

b (1) = d (1)

b = d

by that logic

a = c

so a+b = c+d

no?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

^ wow that was retarded sorry forget that

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Do you mean forget both of your above posts, or do you still claim the really long one to work?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

i still claim the really long one (ab=cd)

just don't know how to use that to prove a+b=c+d

although i can prove a^4+b^4=c^4+d^4

so i'm retarded

but I also stand by the triangle proof. if this was a data sufficiency problem, you only need the first equation.

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Don't have time to sort out the long proof now, but if you can show ab=cd, then proving a+b=c+d is trivial by expanding (a+b)^2 and using a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2. Also, without using the cubic equation, providing a counter-example is easy: a=1 b=2 c=sqrt(2) d=sqrt(3) for example so it can't hold so triangle goes out the window.

So if this was a data sufficiency question, the 1st is certainly not sufficient.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

don't even sort it out - it's wrong too. lol don't know what i was thinking

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

dude

?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Wow still not solved? I'll really give it ago in a bit. I'm starting to lose my respect for WSO after some of the brainteaser answers I've seen...

Like that guy who didn't know the sum of 1 to 100...

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Not knowing how to add 1 to 100, is inexcusable unless you were dropped on your head as a kid. However this problem is legitimately tough, I got a 50 on the Math on the GMAT, but have no clue how to solve this.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

^^^

MAXIMUM...how about YOU solve this???

Get busy living

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

U cannot do the triangle proof, as u cannot solve it for i>2. If you can do it for i = 4 u should normally be able to generalize it for i and i +1 and u will be fine - as long as it holds.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

a^2+b^2=a^3d^2+b^3+c^2 = (c+d)(c^2-cd+d^2)

Based on Fermats Theory

(ad)^e + (bd)^e = (cd)^e

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

He's like Yoda or something.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

No hints lol I wanna see how long this goes on

I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I got something short and elegant for you.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

No homo..

Okay I throw in the towel. A dude with a Math Fin degree and his bud who got a PhD Math came here before so who am I to speak here, just a random non-target chimp..

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

B = A, C = A, D=A+B-C A=1 B=1 C=1 D=1+1-1=1

D^2 = A^2 + B^2 - C^2 =1^2 + 1^2 - 1^2

D^3 = A^3 + B^3-C^3 = 1^3 = 1^3+1^3-1^3=1^3

B= -A + C +D = 1= -1+1+1

A^2+B^2=C^2+D^2 = (A+B)(A^2-AB+B^2)=(C+D)(C^2-DC+D^2)=

1^2+1^2=1^2+1^2= (1+1)(1^2-1+1^2)=(1+1)(1^2-1+1^2)=2=2

That actually was a lot easier than I originally thought.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

We have a winner, folks. Congrats, very elegant!

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

That was actually kinda the direction I showed you one page before. It's pretty straight-forward if you do it in a generalized way. This case is i =1 (like Im not very creative showed). If you replace the 1's with i and you can show it another time for i+1 (what you can do) you have a mathematically nice and sound proof (of course not GMAT plug-in style). The trick is really just to calculate the positive solution for D, C, B, and A and then move forward (actually with i, i+1 it's the same and also pretty easy). Dunno, we had to do these induction proofs all the time during high school. I guess there's more exciting stuff at this age.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I don't follow how this is proof. All it shows is that it works for a=b=c?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You're fucking with us right Dr. Joe?

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Given A = B = C = D = n

And n = 1

Is true

What about n =/= 1?

Get busy living

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Someone else proved ab=cd so I'll start there. Could be wrong as I haven't taken a math class in almost a decade.

(1) Given: ab = cd

So a = cd/b and c = ab/d

(2) a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

Sub in for a and c from (1)

(c^2 * d^2)/b^2 + b^2 = (a^2 * b^2)/d^2 + d^2

(3) multiply each side b^2 * d^2 then rearrange and factor

(c^2 * d^4) + (b^4 * d^2) = (a^2 * b^4) + (b^2 * d^4)

(c^2 * d^4) - (b^2 * d^4) = (a^2 * b^4) - (b^4 * d^2)

d^4 * (c^2 - b^2) = b^4 * (a^2 - d^2)

(4) Rearrange a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

So c^2 - b^2 = a^2 - d^2 = X

(5) Sub in X in equation (3)

d^4 * X = b^4 *X

b^4 = d^4 so b=d for all positive numbers

(6) ab=cd and b=d, then a =c so a+b=c+d

That killed some time at work, almost time to start drinking.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You have it backwards - it has been repeatedly proven that if ab=cd then we are all set. The unsolved part is proving ab=cd.

Side note - looks like I got someone to join WSO just to solve math problems.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Lol sarcasm doesn't seem to come across very well online. I just picked the most nonsensical thing posted thus far and declared it true.

Edit - I can't believe I just had to clarify that

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

LOL

You definitely had me until this post. I was like, wtf!?!?!?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Wtf, Okay....

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Don't take it personally - I simply could not understand what you were proving.

But do you understand why your proof was insufficient?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Yes I do. I only posted the solution, I didnt actually "prove" it.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Oh well as a solution your answer is perfectly fine, its just not a proof, which is what I was looking for.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

B=A C=A D=A+B-C A=5 B=5 C=5 D=5+5-5=5

D^2 = A^2 +B^2 - C^2 = 25=25+25-25

D^3 = A^3 +B^3 -C^3 = 125=125+125-125

B= -A + C + D = -5+5+5=5

A^2+B^2=C^2+D^2 = (A+B)(A^2-AB+B^2)=(C+D)(C^2-DC+D^2)=

= (5+5)(5^2-25+5^2)=250=(5+5)(5^2-25+5^2)=250 Which means that 5^3+5^3=5^3+5^3 or 125+125=125+125

For n =/=1

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I am sorry but I really don't know what you are trying to say here. Let's start at the very beginning: why is C=A? What are you trying to prove?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

C does not always have to equal A...but it will be equal to either A or B...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

nonTargetChimp, I came up with the exact same solution as you, but it is wrong because a,b,c, and d don't have to be positive.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Yes they do - they are all positive.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Ok Dr. Joe,

I'm going to publicly ask for a hint. Lets be honest, getting to ab=cd is piss easy, its the next part that needs some direction.

I just don't want to spend hours on it on a Friday then find out some smartass has posted the proof. i.e. I'm getting paranoid and continuously refreshing this page.

Edit: Can you PM me the hint? Since now everyone knows. I'll obviously mention it in my proof if I get there.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I'm surprised nobody posted it on a math forum and got it solved in a matter of minutes...

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

I was actually thinking the same thing. Though I am not sure it would be solved in a matter of minutes. I think we've had some fairly mathematically inclined individuals here as well.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Let a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2 = k

a + b = u, c + d = v

a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

(a + b)(a^2+b^2 - ab) = (c + d)(c^2+d^2 - cd) (1)

Notice ab = [(a+b)^2 - a^2 - b^2]/2 = (u^2 - k)/2

Same with cd = (v^2 - k)/2

(1) u(k - (u^2 - k)/2) = v(k - (v^2 - k)/2)

Multiply both sides by 2

u.(2k - u^2 + k) = v(2k - v^2 + k)

u.(3k - u^2) = v.(3k - v^2)

3k(u-v) - (u^3 - v^3) = 0

Case 1: u = v. Done

Case 2: 3k = u^2 + v^2 - uv

or 3(a^2+b^2) = (a + b)^2 + (c + d)^2 - (a+b)(c+d)

a^2 + b^2 + (a+b)(c+d) - 2ab - 2cd = 0 (2)

If a + b > c + d

(2)

=> (a - b)^2 + (a+b)(c+d) - 2cd = 0

a + b > c + d

(a+b)(c+d) > (c + d)^2

=> Left side > (a - b)^2 + (c + d)^2 - 2cd = (a - b)^2 + c^2+d^2 > 0

If a + b

(2)

=> (c - d)^2 + (a+b)(c+d) - 2ab = 0

c + d > a + b

(a+b)(c+d) > (a + b)^2

=> Left side > (c - d)^2 + (a + b)^2 - 2ab = (c - d)^2 + a^2+b^2 > 0

=> Case 2 is impossible

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

edit:delete (my post)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Equation 2 seems wrong

Where did the 3 go? Coefficient of the squares should be 2, no?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

No I'm not wrong let me clarify further

3(a^2+b^2) = (a + b)^2 + (c + d)^2 - (a+b)(c+d)

3(a^2+b^2) = 2(a^2+b^2) + (c^2 + d^2)

(a + b)^2 + (c + d)^2 - (a+b)(c+d)

= a^2+b^2 + 2ab + c^2 + d^2 + 2cd - (a+b)(c+d)

Therefore you can cross a^2+b^2 + c^2 + d^2 from both sides. Please double check it for yourself

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

yeah my bad you are right. damn checking these proofs is surprisingly difficult. what about the comment above?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

u^3 - v^3 = (u-v)(u^2 + v^2 + uv), not (u-v)(u^2 + v^2 - uv),

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Oh yeah you're right

Goddamn it. No way I'm spending anymore of my Friday night time to do this.. Good luck fellow primates.

P/S: Why can't I edit my previous post anymore ????

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

i didn't come from a private school or anything, so maybe that's why, but...

none of this shit seems to me like middle school or even high school level math.

what is this "i = 1 and 4" stuff, and from left, and from right?

Can you guys point me in the right direction, so I can try to learn it? what is the name of the topic?

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

The short answer: slope/intersect form. It appears that non-target is trying to solve it as a linear programming model (although is isnt in y=mx+b form yet), but I do not think this problem requires that degree of complication.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

As I mentioned, the solution requires nothing more than algebra. Of course, algebra can mean anything from middle school to PhD level stuff, but a typical Algebra 2 course is sufficient here.

For what its worth, this problem came from ________________

Edit - will cite source after it is solved

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Algebra 2 is what? "pre-calc" or something like Linear Algebra

If I disagree with you, it's because you're wrong.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

pre-calc

though to be completely honest, to understand/complete the proof (and be able to show that it is true on a deep level), a mathematical proofs course would help

anyways i'll be in the chat room for a bit if anyone wants to discuss this problem

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Given:

a^2+b^2=c^2+d^2

a^3+b^3=c^3+d^3

Show that:

a+b=c+d

a,b,c,d >0

Pf: Assume a+b=c+d

(a+b)^2=(c+d)^2

a^2+2ab+b^2=c^2+2cd+d^2

a^2+b^2-c^2-d^2=2cd-2ab

0=2cd-2ab

0=cd-ab

ab=cd

(a+b)^3=(c+d)^3

a^3+3a^2b+3ab^2+b^3=c^3+3c^2d+3cd^2+d^3

a^3+b^3-c^3-d^3=3c^2d+3cd^2-3a^2b-3ab^2

0=3cd(c+d)-3ab(a+b)

3ab(a+b)=3cd(c+d)

ab(a+b)=cd(c+d)

Using shit above, ab=cd --> (a+b)=(c+d)

Closer?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Here is an idea.... (someone can do the algebra grunt work and get the credit)

Lets get rid of one variable first

rewriting first equation

a = (c^2 + d^2 - b^2) ^ (1/2)

rewriting second equation

a = (c^3 + d^3 - b^3) ^ (1/3)

now we can get rid of "a"

(c^2 + d^2 - b^2) ^ (1/2) = (c^3 + d^3 - b^3) ^ (1/3)

******NOW THIS IS WHERE IT GETS COMPLICATED **********

we can rewrite the equation above isolating "b" so it is in terms of "c" and "d"

i don't know how to factor that shit, but in theory we would have an equation like

b = ( nasty ass equation with "c" and "d" )

we could do the same steps up to this point, but instead of getting rid of "a" we get rid of "b"

b = (c^2 + d^2 - a^2) ^ (1/2)

b = (c^3 + d^3 - a^3) ^ (1/3)

then

(c^2 + d^2 - a^2) ^ (1/2) = (c^3 + d^3 - a^3) ^ (1/3)

again we isolate "a"

a = (nasty ass equation with "c" and "d")

******** now this is where everything should tie ************

this two equations should be exactly the same

b = ( nasty ass equation with "c" and "d" )

a = (nasty ass equation with "c" and "d")

therefore

a = b

then

c = d (by doing the dame process for "c" and "d" )

by substitution in first equation:

a^2+ a^2 = c^2 + c^2

2 a^2 = 2 c^2

simplified

a = c

and is done.

if we know that a = b , c = d , a = c

then

a + b = c + d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Anyone find anything wrong with this?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

How is this a proof? Are you out of your fucking mind? What the hell is a "nasty ass equation"? An equation with gonorrhea? I don't think its possible to get to a=c from the information we have. a+b = c+d is as much as we can infer.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Yeah, nvm, the nasty ass equation part isn't the problem (who cares about rigor we need to get the concept). The problem is that I think that you wouldn't be able to isolate a and b properly like he says u do after getting the "nasty ass equation." His idea was that by expanding out the equations and isolating a and b, you would get a=b, but there are a variety of possibilities a and b could be from those equations. so it's wrong. i think.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

You actually follow my logic... is not elegant by any means. The heart of my approach is isolating "a" in the equation:

(c^2 + d^2 - a^2) ^ (1/2) = (c^3 + d^3 - a^3) ^ (1/3)

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

i'm pretty sure a=b and c=d don't have to be true for the equations to work so....

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

jec is spot on

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Here is a list of 42 methods of mathematical proofs.......might actually help

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Awesome, +1

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

B=A. C=B. D=A+B-C

Alternatives:

C=A. D=B. C=B.D=A

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Ok wait, if this is as simple as I think it is, I will seriously be kicking myself for having wasted my Thursday and Friday evenings. Here goes.

Take (a+b) and (c+d). Square both sides. In this case you get:

a^2 + 2ab + b^2 and c^2 + 2cd + d^2. Now, we know that a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2. Hence,

a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = a^2 + 2cd + b^2. Subtract a^2 + b^2 from both sides we have:

ab = cd.

Now, we know that a^3 + b^3 = c^3 + d^3. If we factor each side out,

(a+b)(a^2 - ab + b^2) = (c+d)(c^2 - cd + d^2).

Now again we know that a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2, and we also know that ab = cd. Hence,

(a+b)(a^2 - ab + b^2) = (c+d)(a^2 - ab + b^2).

Therefore a+b = c+d.

Seriously? OMfg.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

lol'd

basically assume you're right, and then you that assumption as proof.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

What the fuck? Where have I assumed I am right? I have independently squared a+b and c+d you fucking retard.

Then out of that I took out a^2 + b^2 and c^2 + d^2.

Heres a tip: Shut the fuck up if you don't know anything.

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Sorry maxlikelihood but you did assume a+b=c+d in the first step, then used that to conclude ab=cd, then used that to prove a+b=c+d

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

you realise that you can only get

a^2 + 2ab + b^2 = a^2 + 2cd + b^2. Subtract a^2 + b^2 from both sides we have

if you assume a+b=c+d....

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Listen fuck for brains, I have A + C + B and A + D + B. If I subtract A + B from both sides what am I left with?

That's right your fucking septum-less brain. Dropped much as a kid?

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

chill out dude. getting mad can only make you look worse if you end up being wrong.

your step to a^2+b^2+2ab=a^2+b^2+2cd is where you made that leap.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

As far as I can see, the only condition on a,b,c and d is that

a^2 - ab + b^2 and c^2 - cd + d^2 are non-zero. Other than that, really there are no conditions, though I think its safe to keep them all positive real numbers (not necessarily integers). I think QED no? ...

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

EDIT: ignore the asterisks...i needed to include them because of spacing errors.

Solved, Bitches...

So we were given the following two equations:

Equation 1: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

Equation 2: a^3 + b^3 = c^3 + d^3

Equation 2 written in alternate form (Call this Equation 2.1):

(a + b) (a^2 - ab + b^2) = (c + d) (c^2 - cd + d^2)

Divide each side of Equation 2.1 by (c + d); then again divide each side by (a + b). After squaring both sides, we get:

(a^2 - ab + b^2)^2*******(c^2 - cd + d^2)^2

---------------------- = ----------------------

(c + d)^2******************(a + b)^2

Factor out the denominators, and this becomes:

(a^2 - ab + b^2)^2******(c^2 - cd + d^2)^2

---------------------- = ----------------------

c^2 + 2cd + d^2*********a^2 + 2ab + b^2

Now we have to find the LCD, for those of you who took middle school math. To do this, multiply the left side of the equation by:

a^2 + 2ab + b^2

a^2 + 2ab + b^2

And multiply the right side of the equation by:

c^2 + 2cd + d^2

c^2 + 2cd + d^2

The entire equation is now expressed as:

(a^2 + 2ab + b^2) (a^2 - ab + b^2)^2***(c^2 + 2cd + d^2) (c^2 - cd +d^2)^2

-------------------------------------------- = -------------------------------------------

(a^2 + 2ab + b^2) (c^2 + 2cd + d^2)****(a^2 + 2ab + b^2) (c^2 + 2cd + d^2)

Since the denominators are equal, the numerators must therefore also be equal, so let's focus on the numerator:

(a^2 + 2ab + b^2) (a^2 - ab + b^2)^2 = (c^2 + 2cd + d^2) (c^2 - cd +d^2)^2

Referring back to equation 1, we know a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

Let us define x = a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2

Substituting the new variable x into that numerator yields:

(x + 2ab) (x - ab)^2 = (x + 2cd) (x - cd)^2

ab must therefore equal cd for this to hold. Now refer to Equation 2.1:

(a + b) (a^2 - ab + b^2) = (c + d) (c^2 - cd + d^2)

Given that a^2 + b^2 = c^2 + d^2 (Equation 1) and our proof that ab = cd, (a^2 - ab + b^2) mus therefore equal (c^2 - cd + d^2).

And now that those two terms are equal, that leaves a + b = c + d.

For the record, this took me a few hours to solve. Interesting problem, Dr Joe.

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Proof for why ab=cd?

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

Ok I think the banana then goes to stephan520?

Just Do It

## Want to Vote on this Content?! No WSO Credits ?

## Pages

- 1
- 2
- next ›
- last »

Add a CommentMust Reads on Wall Street OasisRelated Content on Wall Street Oasis