Circular references in LBO models

Hi all,

I have a problem with lbo models, I don't understand how they involve circular references ?

Here is a very very basic model, where you enter a debt level and your expected FCF/EBITA (lets assume they're the same) to calculate your return (i broke the link, WSO wouldn't let me post it if not):

htt p://w ww.se ndspace.co m/file/cd1xo4

The more debt, the more interests I pay, the less excess cash I have, the less I amortize my debt. There are no circular references.

Do you know what I am missing that would introduce a circular reference in this model please ? (not that I love circular references, but it seems to be the base of any lbo model, and I can't see where they come from).

In advance, thank you for your help !

 
Best Response

you can create an lbo model without circular refs if you calc interest based on prior ending balance. they come into play when you calc interest on average balance outstanding, i.e. (prior ending balance + current period ending balance)/2. Circular BC your interest is dependent on ending balance, ending balance is dependent on cash flow available to amort debt, and that cash flow available to amort debt is dep on interest. look at any basic lbo model template and you'll see that.

 

Iteration. Turn it on - find a setting that works for you (# of tries / precision). (Tools-Options-Calculation iirc, not at the office now and my home computer has '07)

 

Iterations. Very basic setting requirement for modeling. Also make sure to have your basic add-ins for calculations of IRRs and such, although this may differ according to formulas.

 

Sometimes you have to go through and delete problem cells then undo the deletes and it will work. Can be very frustrating. Have spent hours trying to make the circular reference work properly. Try saving then deleting cells like interest expense and other items in the cash flow statement that are tied to cash then crtl+z until it is back to normal.

https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
 

Thanks for your answers. I've looked at some models, that's actually the case (they take the average balance instead of just the prev. ending balance). I didn't know we were supposed to do it like that.

 
Nilugee-Jackson:

Thanks for your answers. I've looked at some models, that's actually the case (they take the average balance instead of just the prev. ending balance). I didn't know we were supposed to do it like that.

The logic follows how you would calc DSO and DPO. You take the average of the beg and end balance because interest is being accrued over time. If you use one or the other, you are going to over or under represent actual interest.

 

This works well in lbo models, at least the ones I do...

Replace the offending cells with constants, e.g. the number 5 and hit F9 to refresh until you get numbers replacing the #div's.

Then, go in and replace them with the actual formulas, one-by-one, hitting F9 after each one. Everything should update correctly.

Sometimes with an lbo model I'll just replace the interest expense (which is the circular part obviously) with a constant, get everything looking right and then paste in the formulas and refresh to fix.

 
dosk17:
This works well in lbo models, at least the ones I do...

Replace the offending cells with constants, e.g. the number 5 and hit F9 to refresh until you get numbers replacing the #div's.

Then, go in and replace them with the actual formulas, one-by-one, hitting F9 after each one. Everything should update correctly.

Sometimes with an lbo model I'll just replace the interest expense (which is the circular part obviously) with a constant, get everything looking right and then paste in the formulas and refresh to fix.

Another easy way to fix circ errors is to include a choose function (or something similar) that toggles between using the average and beginning balance of debt to calculate interest expense. Average balance is of course the correct method, but switching to beginning balance can help to strip out a circ.

 

I remember in training they taught you to build a circ toggle to replace interest expense cells with hard values (zero) to fix your div'ed out model. I don't know anyone that actually builds the toggle, though. It's funny, it's obviously more efficient but I always just cut the interest expense, paste it to the side, replace with zeros, F9, then paste it back in. And I know the former pre-MBAs here did it too because it's hilarious - I see 0's to the side of the interest expense lines (outside the print area) in older models every time without fail.

 

Sit itaque adipisci enim cumque. Aut quo qui fugiat doloribus. Occaecati dolore alias qui sunt.

Rerum eius doloribus pariatur vel hic. Voluptatem ab eum eaque non. Et nisi atque dolore iure optio doloribus ullam atque. Enim molestias cum sunt totam dolores et eum.

Occaecati soluta nulla eum recusandae iste animi dolores. Ad molestias enim ut sunt necessitatibus impedit. Accusamus illum quas dolorum fuga. Quaerat doloremque eius et est quae. Sunt maxime odio magni consectetur tempore aut. Recusandae eligendi recusandae laborum rem praesentium iste. Veniam natus molestias beatae molestias.

Nam libero error quidem quo molestiae possimus. Similique beatae minima et soluta est. Laborum natus quas expedita. Voluptatem quas ipsa quaerat natus.

 

Error ullam alias cumque eum. Officiis accusamus sint rerum sint culpa fugit distinctio vel. Ipsa doloremque animi amet tempore sit. Porro voluptatibus et architecto deleniti id molestiae.

Facere impedit dolores unde eum consequatur qui repellendus. Non totam et deserunt alias impedit voluptatem perferendis. Consequuntur earum quas nemo occaecati. Atque vel pariatur velit ullam delectus. Dicta tempore doloremque quisquam laboriosam laudantium animi. Sint quis vero ipsum odit. Optio ad enim placeat maiores expedita quisquam.

Velit et id porro vel cum in repudiandae. Voluptatem blanditiis beatae provident dolores iusto minus quae et. Error mollitia sint fugiat nulla. Omnis similique deserunt quibusdam nostrum possimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”