Circular references in LBO models

Hi all,

I have a problem with lbo models, I don't understand how they involve circular references ?

Here is a very very basic model, where you enter a debt level and your expected FCF/EBITA (lets assume they're the same) to calculate your return (i broke the link, WSO wouldn't let me post it if not):

htt p://w ww.se ndspace.co m/file/cd1xo4

The more debt, the more interests I pay, the less excess cash I have, the less I amortize my debt. There are no circular references.

Do you know what I am missing that would introduce a circular reference in this model please ? (not that I love circular references, but it seems to be the base of any lbo model, and I can't see where they come from).

In advance, thank you for your help !

29 Comments
 
Best Response

you can create an lbo model without circular refs if you calc interest based on prior ending balance. they come into play when you calc interest on average balance outstanding, i.e. (prior ending balance + current period ending balance)/2. Circular BC your interest is dependent on ending balance, ending balance is dependent on cash flow available to amort debt, and that cash flow available to amort debt is dep on interest. look at any basic lbo model template and you'll see that.

 

Iteration. Turn it on - find a setting that works for you (# of tries / precision). (Tools-Options-Calculation iirc, not at the office now and my home computer has '07)

 

Figured it out 10 minutes after posting aha

I've got iterations enabled... just made a rookie mistake

And my bank is still on 03 as well. Not sure if any BB's have actually made the transition to 07+

 

Iterations. Very basic setting requirement for modeling. Also make sure to have your basic add-ins for calculations of IRRs and such, although this may differ according to formulas.

 

Sometimes you have to go through and delete problem cells then undo the deletes and it will work. Can be very frustrating. Have spent hours trying to make the circular reference work properly. Try saving then deleting cells like interest expense and other items in the cash flow statement that are tied to cash then crtl+z until it is back to normal.

https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
 

Thanks for your answers. I've looked at some models, that's actually the case (they take the average balance instead of just the prev. ending balance). I didn't know we were supposed to do it like that.

 
Nilugee-Jackson

Thanks for your answers. I've looked at some models, that's actually the case (they take the average balance instead of just the prev. ending balance). I didn't know we were supposed to do it like that.

The logic follows how you would calc DSO and DPO. You take the average of the beg and end balance because interest is being accrued over time. If you use one or the other, you are going to over or under represent actual interest.

 

This works well in lbo models, at least the ones I do...

Replace the offending cells with constants, e.g. the number 5 and hit F9 to refresh until you get numbers replacing the #div's.

Then, go in and replace them with the actual formulas, one-by-one, hitting F9 after each one. Everything should update correctly.

Sometimes with an lbo model I'll just replace the interest expense (which is the circular part obviously) with a constant, get everything looking right and then paste in the formulas and refresh to fix.

 
dosk17This works well in lbo models, at least the ones I do...

Replace the offending cells with constants, e.g. the number 5 and hit F9 to refresh until you get numbers replacing the #div's.

Then, go in and replace them with the actual formulas, one-by-one, hitting F9 after each one. Everything should update correctly.

Sometimes with an lbo model I'll just replace the interest expense (which is the circular part obviously) with a constant, get everything looking right and then paste in the formulas and refresh to fix.

Another easy way to fix circ errors is to include a choose function (or something similar) that toggles between using the average and beginning balance of debt to calculate interest expense. Average balance is of course the correct method, but switching to beginning balance can help to strip out a circ.

 

I remember in training they taught you to build a circ toggle to replace interest expense cells with hard values (zero) to fix your div'ed out model. I don't know anyone that actually builds the toggle, though. It's funny, it's obviously more efficient but I always just cut the interest expense, paste it to the side, replace with zeros, F9, then paste it back in. And I know the former pre-MBAs here did it too because it's hilarious - I see 0's to the side of the interest expense lines (outside the print area) in older models every time without fail.

 

Dolorum totam asperiores qui consequuntur velit natus quae. Totam et nulla rerum ea quia aut culpa. Delectus eum corrupti consequuntur et iste. Sit tempore explicabo quidem impedit. Recusandae sequi cupiditate dicta facilis sint velit ea.

Unde consequuntur ut et dolore quisquam odit. Tempora magni eum nostrum quos. Similique magnam officiis dolor sit ipsa provident.

 

Non enim molestias consequatur deleniti perspiciatis ipsum. Reprehenderit molestiae expedita voluptatum tempore illo. Qui eos temporibus hic aut dolor dicta.

Perferendis iure est nihil saepe harum rerum adipisci et. Magni aut unde aut voluptatem voluptatem voluptas quo tempore. Animi voluptatibus tempora modi et delectus quis explicabo est. Veritatis et beatae quo doloremque asperiores nostrum. Possimus dolorem molestias et enim voluptatem.

Voluptatum totam dolores dignissimos enim sint temporibus. Dolorum et consequatur quo quia molestias ab. Tempore qui voluptatem sapiente quod corporis ipsam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”