By the time you are 40 - The long term finance career paths

I am interested in some statistics of the long term finance career path. What are your estimates?

(1) Among the first-year analyst class, the percentage of those who are still in finance at the age of 40.

(2) For those who went to PE after analyst years,by the age of 40, the percentage of those who became Partners or MDs, the percentage of those who are still in PE, and the median income.

(3) For those who went to HF, by the age of 40, the percentage of those who became PMs, the percentage of those who are still in HF, and and the median income.

(4) For those who stay in IB, by the age of 40, the percentage of those who became MDs, the percentage of those who are still in IB, and and the median income.

 
HedgeKing][quote=Oreos]<a href=http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/what-banker-careers-really-look-like-the-data[/quote>http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/blog/what-banker-careers-really-look-lik…</a>:

Bankerella's data don't really have the information I am looking for.

Well that's the best you're going to get sonny jim, next time i won't bother. jeeez some people.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

I've always been curious about this, but I am skeptical that it would be possible to get hard data anywhere. The closest would be anecdotes from someone further along in their careers who has kept in touch with most of their banking class. Also any statistics derived over the last 20 years would not be as relevant for someone's chances today.

 
moneymogul:
I think I speak for myself and many other banking aspirants when I say that I've always assumed life ends at 30 and therefore have never really thought beyond that point.

AM seems to be the exception, where many actually stay long term and grow old. Maybe ER is too.

In term of the percentage of those who are 40 and still in it as a long term career, I think it goes like this:

AM, ER > non-M&A IB > M&A IB > PE > HF

But the short term payoff may be in exactly the reverse order. So there seems to be a negative correlation between the long term career and short term payoff.

My question then is this. Is the short term payoff actually the market's compensation for the risk premium of the long term career?

 
moneymogul:
I think I speak for myself and many other banking aspirants when I say that I've always assumed life ends at 30 and therefore have never really thought beyond that point.

Somehow I have the impression that many in WSO are youths who do not think about what they will be beyond 30, let alone 40.

 
HedgeKing:
moneymogul:
I think I speak for myself and many other banking aspirants when I say that I've always assumed life ends at 30 and therefore have never really thought beyond that point.

Somehow I have the impression that many in WSO are youths who do not think about what they will be beyond 30, let alone 40.

Even if one does think about where they will be when they are at age 40 when they are 21, they will almost certainly be wrong. Life happens, things change, and what you are concerned about changes.

At least 1/2 the people who start somewhere in finance either dislike it entirely or want to do something completely different within finance as they learn more through experience. Not to mention marriages, kids, health/medical situations, and deaths that can radically change your plans.

 

Nope, pretty common across Wall Street. Hit 40/45 and you're out the door. Jump into an industry, start a business, move to PWM, consulting, boutiques, MMs, etc. The ones that made a lot of money and saved it go golfing for 30-40 years.

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 

What you are describing is what I have seen as well. Working in this industry takes a toll on relationships and the body. I have seen grown men cry because they don't know their kids and their wife is banging somebody else. Think about how much stress you are exposed to on a weekly basis and then compound that over 20 years. A lot of people burnout and bounce to industry or teaching or golfing. Some people love the work and stay much later than their 40s. It would be pretty hard to deal with the stress if you have a modest lifestyle and enough money to retire; the golf course would look pretty damn nice.

Quid Spucatum Tauri Est? Illegitimi Non Carborundum.
 

If they stay in industry, they often go to smaller firms, but yeah, it's usuall make your money and GTFO

Is this a more recent cultural shift? My perception is that people tended to stay in industry longer in generations past.

Anyone?

Get busy living
 

I have it on good authority it's been that way since at least the early 90s

"You stop being an asshole when it sucks to be you." -IlliniProgrammer "Your grammar made me wish I'd been aborted." -happypantsmcgee
 
D M:

I have it on good authority it's been that way since at least the early 90s

That's true but it is getting worse. The avg retirement on the street has always been low but people are dropping out en masse now. I know at least 10 fund managers that have retired in the last 24 months, a few of them nine figures successful. Time to do something else.

 

There was once a PDF file somewhere written by some guys from various bank explaining the lifestyle of bankers. It somewhere said that the people who didn't manage to exit by 40 are the ones going from bank to bank, on the spiral down from tier to tier, or sth along those lines. Does anyone know that text/file?

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 

I have asked this myself and here is the general sense I get in terms of a class of 100 analysts by years:

After analyst program / 5 years / 10 years+ (100 Analysts starting out)

After Analyst Program 25 - Hedge fund analyst 25 - Private Equity / Mezz / Private Investments 20 - Business School 10 - Business Development 10 - Associate promote 10 - Associate promote to another group (DCM, ECM, Industry Coverage)

5 Years Out 20 Hedge Fund - Many guys will leave for bschool, some will come from PE as a 'hybrid' - still tough to keep a role like this. 20 PE - Again interchange able as the MBA candidates might get a role or many just got out of their MBA programs and join a FoF or some role similar 5 - Associates promoted to VP - Again tough and many will eave 5 - Associated promoted and moved to another group (DCM to LevFin, etc) 30 - General industry - many will leave and do something entirely different and unrelated, tech startup, go back to motherland to start a businss, etc. Everyone has their own reasons but this is a very natural time to make a switch.
20 - Stay in finance but a different role such as IR, fund raising, corporate banking, Asset Management, management

10 years out 5 - Will remain in IB related role 10 - Will be partners or PMs at PE/HF 25 - Will continue to be in the finance industry 50 - God knows. They moved on with their lives and have nothing to do with finance.

Hope this helps.

 

Live in the Present. Focus on what needs to be done today. Live one day at a time. Only focus on what is the next step. As Analyst: move to Associate role. As Associate: move to VP role. Don't think too far ahead. The world is changing really fast as you also need to be ready to change along with it.

I only believe in a few things: 1) be good to those who love you and spend more time with them, 2) build your own power base with stakeholders: family, partner, mentors, peers, mentees, industry contacts, friends, 3) constantly expand your network and build quality relationship, 4) always update your skills and learn new ones, 5) stack sizable cash (1-2 years of expenses with no debt).

"I am the hero of the story. I don't need to be saved."
 
Human:
Live in the Present. Focus on what needs to be done today. Live one day at a time. Only focus on what is the next step. As Analyst: move to Associate role. As Associate: move to VP role. Don't think too far ahead. The world is changing really fast as you also need to be ready to change along with it.

I only believe in a few things: 1) be good to those who love you and spend more time with them, 2) build your own power base with stakeholders: family, partner, mentors, peers, mentees, industry contacts, friends, 3) constantly expand your network and build quality relationship, 4) always update your skills and learn new ones, 5) stack sizable cash (1-2 years of expenses with no debt).

Very true, and my last SB+ to you sir!

From my personal observation (I'm a bit longer in the industry than most of the posters here), and lengthy discussions with colleagues, with time priorities change for many, and go exactly in the direction you mention. It is currently my case as well.

Focus on your life and quality time, family and "stakeholders", your interests + opportunities, making a decent living and your priorities (e.g. a load of cash, if this is your goal).

You should always aspire to make more out of your life (including career/activity), which is good and tackle it with drive and energy. Avoid stubbornly fixating in a specific "career/position" or worse envy anyone, as it can only yield to frustration.

Now to OPs question in a simple example: the successful entrepreneur is looked upon by the start-up guy, the start-up guy is looked upon by the PE guy, the PE guy is looked upon by the I-banker, the i-banker is looked upon by the corporate banker, the corporate banker is looked upon by the retail banker and so on...

[Edit: By no means I'm suggesting everyone should follow this path, or be an entrepreneur -ths is just an example and a thought-. Walk your path aspiring to have a genuine notion of why you are doing what you are doing, and aspinring for something better for YOU, not for the sake of the "traditional" path]

 
Best Response

Yeah, as someone who has been around the industry for a while and is older than most of the posters here, I can tell you that:

1) Go to target 2) Break in 3) Go to b-school 4) ??? 5) Profit

is patently false. There are plenty of washouts both before and after business school, including people from TOP targets (it's kinda gay when people capitalize top like that).

The real path is this:

1) Break in any way possible 2) Learn to invest, whether HF / PE / AM 3) Profit

That's it. It doesn't matter where you went to school or what you studied as long as you break in. Some paths are easier than others, but once you're in, all that matters is making money. If you can consistently make money, people will throw money at you and you can do just about anything you want. You have to love the work to get to that level. If you can't make money, then you're not going to do well regardless of the degrees. In baseball terms, some people can hit a 100 mph fastball and some can't, that's just the way it is.

 

To answer the question though, a lot of people who are successful retire at 35 or 40 and do other things. Those who truly have a passion for the work keep churning, often mentoring up and comers while they themselves make huge stacks of cash. After a certain point, maybe $20 million or whatever your number is, you do it because you love it, not because you can realistically use more money.

 

I spent 10 years in banking more or less going straight through (first 2 years were something different). I am now leaving to start a company.

A few of my friends that feel like the have peaked at their PE funds (logjam of more senior people ahead of them taking all of the carry) have left to join portfolio companies as the CFO/Head of Corp Dev/Head of Biz Dev. For a high profile version of this exit, take a look at the CEO of Vail Resorts.

Another friend who want banking -> HF -> co-founding another hedge fund as a junior partner is now founding his own HF.

The general trend as you move forward in your career at a more senior level is to take on a role where you can be in charge and help run things/make the important decisions.

 

its just sad that you can literally not make it in life, like taking the train everyday.

Then there's like different types of making it, from having some money, to being able to buy anything without really looking at the price tag and an even more extreme "making it" where you have the option of experiencing everything that life have to offer, whether its spontaneously hopping on a plane destined for half way across the world or etc etc.

I wonder if I'll be rich rich.

 

The minimum I want to achieve at least is buy a house nice in orange county, California that's really close tothe ocean. After that I would like to travel the world, and if i'm really good get a Ph.D in economics and involve myself in research or work for a international financial institution. Other goals I hope will happen in start in investment banking at eventually get into private equity and work myself at the ladder. I know this is probably impossible but I would really want to buy myself a house in a nice part of California that's near the ocean like a walk or a few minutes with the car.

 

n I know that you gotta work hard to get money, but is there a limit? like some people work hard and after a certain point, they hit a plateau in what they earn right? What is that plateau. Also, after a certain point is it even worth those extra bills for the effort. Is that how people settle for what they got.

If you look at some rappers like Banks and Yayo, they lucked out by being around 50. he spotted them heavy and gave them fast easy money.

work harder support the rich.

is that true too. once you make a certain amount does it require less effort or what.

 

One, just type like a normal fucking person. How anyone could take you seriously with a post like this is beyond me. Two, it's hilarious that the same person who asked about how phone interviews usually go one month ago is now having this grand epiphany about the end goal of an investment banking analyst. "Cause these hours lol..." Guy, you're in school, you have no idea. And the 10-week internship "grind" is nothing.

 

youre stupid. I never said anything bout Ibanking. Im talking about work and "making it" and life in general, which is why I included rappers, etc. Its not a serious post where Im having a "grand epiphany". Im simply expressing my thoughts, like what can someone really accomplish in a lifetime, and why some people make it while others dont because Im pretty sure we all want "it". btw youre an idiot.

 

Quibusdam molestiae modi qui omnis dolorem officiis. Pariatur ipsa expedita est delectus nihil quam vel eos. Pariatur vitae quidem in quia et. Iste voluptas consequatur maxime et commodi non. Molestiae itaque aut sit harum consequuntur esse perferendis.

Nisi dolores quaerat iure quo neque similique. Illum delectus rem fuga rerum nobis. Iure assumenda qui voluptas natus. Quaerat fuga et pariatur.

Voluptatem qui voluptatibus eveniet est occaecati sit ea sint. Voluptates minus sed quidem aut.

[quote=mbavsmfin]I don't wear watches bro. Because it's always MBA BALLER time! [/quote]
 

Recusandae placeat perferendis ut culpa. Ratione voluptas tempore repellat autem veniam libero.

Accusamus repellendus quidem qui blanditiis magnam. Non quia consectetur id non sunt ipsa. Et magni iusto ipsa quaerat est. Consectetur dignissimos numquam rerum itaque. In est at aut ut voluptatem est. Modi voluptatem ducimus ex modi voluptas qui nostrum.

Amet aut reprehenderit et soluta modi harum ipsam dolore. A esse quidem sunt fuga. Itaque cum voluptatem ullam veniam quibusdam tempore voluptates. Earum quam alias eligendi ipsam ea quos ut.

Necessitatibus excepturi nemo molestiae tempore sunt et. Ea fugiat illum ut cumque sint non. Natus aliquid atque autem nesciunt. Qui molestiae sit magnam vel. Accusamus harum molestiae voluptatum eos est voluptatem et eos. Aperiam et minima eaque voluptas qui modi est pariatur. Aliquam nemo debitis animi vitae quia.

 

Tempora tenetur illo sed natus natus ad. Et vel ab qui similique ut nemo nisi quis. Quia aut dolor tempora deserunt sit soluta et.

Est quae distinctio amet minima et voluptatem ut. Sit provident delectus facilis explicabo error dolor veniam. Nulla dolores sit et error facere impedit. Nesciunt sit quia delectus itaque omnis. Quas et aspernatur occaecati aperiam. Sint voluptas magnam sapiente et sapiente vel voluptates. Qui distinctio ut molestiae animi possimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”