IPO Pricing 101
There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth at the close on Friday over the perceived lack of performance in the Facebook IPO. The stock priced at $38, opened at $42.50 (after a few hiccups at the NASDORK), and closed at exactly $38 after an effort by the syndicate members akin to the Spartans at Thermopylae to keep it from dropping below the offering price. The retail rubes screamed bloody murder, with the NY Post running the headline pictured here claiming that Facebook soaked Main Street for $20 billion.
Where was the pop? Shouldn't Facebook have screamed up at least 50% on the open? Where was Johnny Lunchbucket's payoff for putting 2 and 2 together that Facebook is a popular social media site?
I'm here to tell you boys and girls that Facebook might have been the most perfectly priced IPO I've ever seen. Morgan Stanley did a masterful job pricing the largest IPO in history. And the IPO achieved everything an IPO is supposed to: it injected an ass-load of capital into the company, provided an exit for early investors at a stratospheric rate of return, and generated a shit-ton of fees for the underwriters. Nowhere in the rule book does it say anything about retail investors getting rich on the first day pop.
In fact, if you look at a deal that was patently mis-priced like LinkedIn, you'll see what I'm talking about. Morgan Stanley was behind that one, too, with the help of Bank of America. LinkedIn was priced at $45 a share and opened at $83, trading as high as $122.70 the first day. That is horrendous for both the company and the underwriters.
A mis-valuation of that scale cost LinkedIn more than $130 million - money the company could have used to survive and grow for several more years. Likewise it cost the underwriters roughly $10 million, so the $30 million in fees they split up could have been $40 million. Morgan Stanley was determined not to make that mistake again.
That Mark Zuckerberg is a genius cannot be disputed. What caught me off guard is how much business savvy this kid has, too (because the two often don't go hand-in-hand). He managed to sell a bunch of stock and get his early investors liquid at the absolute peak valuation of his company. Do you think he cares that the stock didn't pop 50%? If it had, he'd probably be calling for someone's head over at Morgan Stanley, because he's no dummy.
Will the investing public be a little more cautious and less enthusiastic about the next tech IPO? They would if they had any sense, but I haven't found that to be the case. The media hype machine will kick in and the lemmings will line up.
Incidentally, I see Facebook dropping a good 10-20% from here as soon as the underwriters cry uncle and quit backstopping it. That's even more evidence of perfect pricing. They got the absolute most the market would bear for the stock, which is what a good agent is supposed to do.
Like we used to say in the old days: The firm made money, the company made money, the clients...well, two outta three ain't bad.






Comments
Well-said Edmundo. The
Well-said Edmundo. The clients need only look at their own greed and exuberance as FB begins its swift descent into the red.
I would caution against exalting Zuckergerg though. I very much doubt that he was in the pricing specfics...hell he didnt even turn up to most of the roadshows. And not to be a hater but I dont really think the kid is that genius...he basically just developed a format that appealed the most to social network junkies. Given the nature of the service, convergence was bound to happen. Some of the ideas he's now floating to monetize the site eg charging folks for greater status update visibility is just batshit stupid.
__________
The pressing question to me
The pressing question to me is why his wife looks so angry in the wedding photo, she has a look I marry billionaire scowl on her face.
Suckerberg isn't too good at
Suckerberg isn't too good at thinking logically. Instagram for $1Billion dollar...no money making ability there. The worst mistake he has made in the past year is get F&!%ing married the day after his baby goes public and he makes 20billion,
Can Someone smack this ahole
Eventus stultorum magister.
Got to agree on this one.
Got to agree on this one. Perfect pricing and that is why I sold a truck load of those on Friday.
CNBC sucks
"This financial crisis is worse than a divorce. I've lost all my money, but the wife is still here." - Client after getting blown up
Still overpriced but good for
Still overpriced but good for them.
I was thinking this same
I was thinking this same thing...it shows that the bank did its job well. If it was up even 25% day 1, that would be proof that they left a lot of money on the table.
I don't know why investors would think IPOs are safe investments. The companies lack significant public track records, and are pricing the stock specifically to raise the most money possible.
What do you make of MS
What do you make of MS supporting the $38? I know it's not officially confirmed but analysts estimating this cost MS low single digit billions and if true probably wipes out advisory gains plus further expected loss as the trades unwind.
Looks like they're done
Looks like they're done backstopping the deal. The stock's at $35.
Holy shit, $34. Down 11% on
Holy shit, $34. Down 11% on the day. Look out below.
Uh-oh! 33.67!
Uh-oh! 33.67!
"All things are difficult before they are easy"
- Thomas Fuller
I think this is even more
I think this is even more pertinent when you take into account the voting right situation that zuck sorted for himself.
Wow, 33.10, this is fun to
Wow, 33.10, this is fun to watch, so for you S&T guys is this "fun" or ulcer-inducing? Guess it depends on your position.
Oreos: I think this is even
I think this is even more pertinent when you take into account the voting right situation that zuck sorted for himself.
He didn't retain 56% of the voting stock because he likes to play team ball.
Every other tech co that was
Every other tech co that was thinking of doing an IPO this year must be on suicide watch
Check out my Blog
33.66 -4.57 (-11.96%) Sweet
33.66 -4.57 (-11.96%)
Sweet mother of....!!!!
__________
Is it possible that MS
I notice that the older I am the more I sound like Illini Programer
- accountingbyday
Actually, $38 a share was
Zuckerberg's wedding
If MS is backstopping the
yellow t-shirt
Clearly they're not
Edmundo Braverman: I'm
I notice that the older I am the more I sound like Illini Programer
- accountingbyday
It was. Had to be, why would
I hate victims who respect their executioners
Follow BH & Co. on Twitter: @DumbLuckCapital
twitter.com/DumbLuckCapital
Damn Edmundo you sure got
One thing is very clear:
It was trading for years in
Facebook is gonna b like
GBS
GoldmanBallSachs: Facebook is
The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee
WSO is not your personal search function.
Forgive my ignorance, but why
Think of MS backstopping the
Thought this would be a good
This is my understanding of
Best priced IPO since GM.
Leadership can be defined in two words: "Follow Me"
interesting stuff guys. I saw
Edmundo Braverman: If I'm
Here's a great
That article pretty well
GBS
The only people who have the
@GoldmanBallSachs No, you
technoviking: interesting
I get what you're saying
If the glove don't fit, you must acquit!
No, that's very true and we
Edmundo Braverman: No, that's
Leadership can be defined in two words: "Follow Me"
From the sounds of it, FB ran