maybe you should look to become a resident of tool academy.

If you can't afford the look why would you want to have it.

Looking to be a hood rich? car cost more than your house?

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 
Best Response

Wearing a rolex into an interview only makes the associate who doesn't have one begin to make assumptions about what kind of family you came from. He will assume you are spoiled and haven't had wot work for anything in your life.

Then he will grill you about how long the hours are and the attrition rate in IBD. At this point he has dinged you twice, if not more, based an a watch. Explain to him that you're not wealthy and that you just bought a knock-off to look nice and that will be the final ding as he hands you his card and moves to the next conference room.

Just wear something that doesn't use mickey mouse body parts for the minute and second hand and you should be fine.

 

I wouldn't do it. You never want to ruffle feathers before you even get into the firm, and a Rolex on a 20 something college student might be seen as "Wow, I didn't have one of those when I was his age, who does this kid think he is?" If you can't afford a real Rolex, which most college students can't (so it might seem strange), get something that looks classic and reserved, but is reasonably priced.

Speaking of Seiko, the "Grand Seiko" is an example of a perfectly acceptable watch and you wouldn't be embarrassed wearing this to an interview. Classic shape, automatic movement, but a decent price. Here's a link: http://www.grand-seiko.com/ . It shouldn't cost more than $350 retail, probably a lot cheaper online, and no one will have potentially negative preconceived notions based on your wristwear. You want everything in your favor at your interview, so don't screw it up before you've even had a chance to speak. Good luck man!

 

Wow. What bullshit.

Anyone wearing 350 dollars on his arm, my first thought would be, "Shit, I could buy 40 shares of AMD for that price." I imagine for anyone in the business of making money spending huge amounts on trash is a huge tool alert.

 
monkeysama:
I imagine for anyone in the business of making money spending huge amounts on trash is a huge tool alert.

Dude, you're smarter than that. Do you really think that people 'in the business of making money' don't spend retarded amounts of money on many things much stupider than watches?

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
monkeysama:
Wow. What bullshit.

Anyone wearing 350 dollars on his arm, my first thought would be, "Shit, I could buy 40 shares of AMD for that price." I imagine for anyone in the business of making money spending huge amounts on trash is a huge tool alert.

Oy vey...

Anyways, yeah the watch shouldn't be a big concern. I wore a Timex ironman watch all during my SA position last summer, and I later realized that one of the ED's liked to wear one too and he definitely could have afforded something more expensive (mine cost $19.99, his probably did, too). Point is, don't lose sleep over this issue.

 

Nobody cares what watch you wear, but if someone realizes that it's fake you're going to look like a royal douche. Yeah, Rolexes are nice, but even if you get a real one it's not like you're wearing a 200K Vacheron Constantin that inspires your interviewer to prostrate himself before your wrist. Hell, there's at least a 50% chance that nobody even notices what watch you're wearing.

I'd never rip on someone who wanted to spend his money on a genuine Rolex if it makes him happy, but spending even a penny to pretend that you have the moderate amount of money necessary to buy a Submariner is just silly. If you're not spending a lot of money on your watch, buy it from a decent but relatively inexpensive brand - Seiko and Tissot come to mind. Sure, someone might look at it and think "ha, this college kid doesn't have a lot of money," but they'd happen to be right, and there's no shame in being a poor college kid. But if they see something that claims to be on a Rolex on someone who looks like he has no business wearing one -- or, worse yet, if they can tell with certainty that it's fake -- they're going to think "what a fucking poseur." And there is shame in being one of those.

One of those lights, slightly brighter than the rest, will be my wingtip passing over.
 

Definitely don't wear a Rolex, whether it is real or fake, to an interview. Or any other watch for that matter. Just buy something thats clean and looks decent. Make sure it's under $300. You don't want to get dinged for the type of watch you have. It's just like everything else, dress the standard way and you won't have to worry.

As far as buying fake watches for yourself, I see no problem. Just don't wear to interview.

-- "Those who say don't know, and those who know don't say."
 

The guy who interviewed me at Goldman, didn't even have a watch. He was a VP and proudly told me that he didn't need one as he uses his phone for that. Buying a fake Rolex is the worst you can do. Just be yourself and don't wear something that you haven't yet earned yourself.

 
Il Cavaliere:
The guy who interviewed me at Goldman, didn't even have a watch. He was a VP and proudly told me that he didn't need one as he uses his phone for that. Buying a fake Rolex is the worst you can do. Just be yourself and don't wear something that you haven't yet earned yourself.
I don't wear a watch. I use my cell to tell time. Is that a liability? [I have a huge scar on my wrist that makes a watch painful]
Get busy living
 

^^^^The watch is going the way of the dress hat, give it 30 years and no one will have one because they'll use they're phones instead.

It's sad, because they make for such nice accessories. If someone is wealthy, and they're not wearing a watch to a nice function, I kinda look down on that.

Btw, there are some really, really, really good Rolex fakes, but you usually have to go abroad to buy them (and not to the random store with all the Romexes, you have to know THE store to go, lol). The second hand will move just like a Rolex, the face is scratch resistant, the date magnifier magnifies exactly the same, the little crown on the bottom of the face (the one etched on the glass) is there, the green hologram on the back is the same, etc. My dad was in Dubai and a friend told him of this store that sold ultra good fakes and my dad bought one of the Rolexes ($300) for shits and giggles more than anything. He took it to a watch store and the guy said he couldn't tell it was fake until he took it apart and compared the inside to a real one.

 
alexpasch:
The second hand will move just like a Rolex, the face is scratch resistant, the date magnifier magnifies exactly the same, the little crown on the bottom of the face (the one etched on the glass) is there, the green hologram on the back is the same, etc.
They no longer do green holograms, the certificates now come in a magnetic strip card, and the inner bezel is engraved
More is good, all is better
 

Personally, I don't think a Rolex is nice enough for someone to be labeled a tool. Now, if someone comes in with a high-end Patek Philippe, then I may ding them.

All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

 
alexpasch:
Personally, I don't think a Rolex is nice enough for someone to be labeled a tool. Now, if someone comes in with a high-end Patek Philippe, then I may ding them.

All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

Dude seriously? That is the definition of unfair. I'd take the non-wealthy kid all the way because he managed to be just as good as the wealthy kid without any of the backgrounds, connections, etc. He probably had to work twice as hard and deserves the job twice as much, and having an IB job will benefit him so much more than the it will the wealthy kid

 
machinegunfunk:
alexpasch:
Personally, I don't think a Rolex is nice enough for someone to be labeled a tool. Now, if someone comes in with a high-end Patek Philippe, then I may ding them.

All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

Dude seriously? That is the definition of unfair. I'd take the non-wealthy kid all the way because he managed to be just as good as the wealthy kid without any of the backgrounds, connections, etc. He probably had to work twice as hard and deserves the job twice as much, and having an IB job will benefit him so much more than the it will the wealthy kid

I like competing against the kids that come from money. I eat them alive.
Get busy living
 
alexpasch:
All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.
do you live in greece, italy,france or belgium?
 
alexpasch:
All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

If that's actually what you think, fine, but familial wealth isn't necessarily the same as connections, nor are parental connections something that a young person can necessarily tap.

I know rich kids whose parents own minor restaurant chains, clothing stores, and tiny law firms. All these parents bought their kids graduation presents at least as expensive as a Rolex, but none of them have familial "connections" of the sort you're talking about.

One of those lights, slightly brighter than the rest, will be my wingtip passing over.
 
2x2Matrix:
alexpasch:
All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

If that's actually what you think, fine, but familial wealth isn't necessarily the same as connections, nor are parental connections something that a young person can necessarily tap.

I know rich kids whose parents own minor restaurant chains, clothing stores, and tiny law firms. All these parents bought their kids graduation presents at least as expensive as a Rolex, but none of them have familial "connections" of the sort you're talking about.

Years ago, my brother didn't get a full time offer [and he's REALLY good] because another kid in the summer program came from a politically connected family in India. The senior bankers used him as an 'in' and terminated him within a year. My brother went on to find a much better position after he graduated, all based on his ability to get shit done. Read this again and think it over.....
Get busy living
 
2x2Matrix:
alexpasch:
All else being equal, if two candidates have the same resume and skillset, but one comes from a wealthy family; I'm picking the kid with the wealthy family because connections are everything in this world.

If that's actually what you think, fine,

I think he might just be the most subtle troll on the board. It's the only explanation.

 

If you have a watch, wear it... I could give a shit if the kid I am interviewing has a nicer watch than me... Anyone who says they will ding some kid because of his watch is an insecure jackass, I am the one in power during every interview I could care less if you are wearing a hublot or a seiko.

 
Juwanna Mann:
alexpasch:
Personally, I don't think a Rolex is nice enough for someone to be labeled a tool. Now, if someone comes in with a high-end Patek Philippe, then I may ding them.

I ding you for this sentence.

I ding you for going to banking instead of the buy-side.

I have nothing against Patek Philippe, just that you should only wear that (especially the more expensive ones) once you're older, regardless of how wealthy your family is.

 

I would do it for sure, while your at it, fill you wallet with lots of cash and make sure to take it out so your interviewer can see how thick it is...that will really impress him.

Don't forget the diamond cuff links...

 
HermesEtAl:
I wear a Hermes tie, Ferragamo shoes, and a Rolex watch to all of my interviews and no one has cared. I've been getting many superday invitations.

I think WSO missed this nugget.

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
 
jmayhem:
HermesEtAl:
I wear a Hermes tie, Ferragamo shoes, and a Rolex watch to all of my interviews and no one has cared. I've been getting many superday invitations.

I think WSO missed this nugget.

yep
Get busy living
 

Granted I'm coming in as a summer associate but I really don't think people give a flying anus about wearing an expensive watch or tie as an analyst/associate/janitor whatever. White collar w/ suspenders is one thing, but who gives a damn if you are wearing Hermes and a Rolex (or any nice watch)? If those people exist, i havent met them and I dont care to. When I was in undergrad plenty of people had Rolex's (or similar) or got them as graduation presents. As long as you aren't an arrogant douche i see no problem.

Having said that, a fake one automatically makes you a tool. Pick up a fake LV for your gf while you're at it.

Just buy something you like that is affordable and some day you can get the real thing.

 

What if you have a good story behind how you got your Rolex? Maybe a former boss gave it to you as a present or you earned it with the money you made trading in high school?

yes, Im quite imaginative, but just play along haha

Greed is Good.
 

Look at Alexpasch's comment history, he is not a troll, just making a valid point. All else being equal why should you hate on the kid that comes from money? Just because a kid's parents have money is no indicator of his work ethic, he also may have some connections and understood the importance of networking. My dad went to a shitty ass school in upstate NY and has done pretty damn good for himself in the past 5-6 years. I went to a public HS in a shitty Texas town and have always been taught nothing is handed to me and if i fuck up in the slightest i will not be able to network through him and give him a shitty reputation. I am genuinely good friends with his friends in their 50's and 60's to the point that they come visit me when they are in the city and text me bullshit about my college football team. Yeah i agree that there are a lot of little pricks out there that think they deserve everything because where they come from but it's pretty ignorant to make a blanket statment that kids who come from money are worhless and "get eaten alive" by kids who did not. Everything i have learned about how to deal with people came from my dad and i believe i have seen a lot of situations (listening in on calls) that has really changed my attitude towards business.

That being said, wearing a rolex to a interview makes you the Ronnie of d-bags...wearing a fake rolex to interviews makes you the Situation of d-bags.

 
HFFBALLfan123:
Look at Alexpasch's comment history, he is not a troll, just making a valid point. All else being equal why should you hate on the kid that comes from money?
reread his post. theres a massive difference between not hating and prefering.
 

It is my experience that a higher percentage of kids from money are better socialized. Like they could be total d-bags, but they know when and where they got to act nice and upstanding. I don't come from the money (both of my parents are fucking intellectuals) and I got to admit I learned most of my useful social skills from rich kids, I find too many kids from poor background have the biggest chip on their shoulder that drags them much further down than a lack of knowledge about something would.

More is good, all is better
 
Argonaut:
It is my experience that a higher percentage of kids from money are better socialized. Like they could be total d-bags, but they know when and where they got to act nice and upstanding. I don't come from the money (both of my parents are fucking intellectuals) and I got to admit I learned most of my useful social skills from rich kids, I find too many kids from poor background have the biggest chip on their shoulder that drags them much further down than a lack of knowledge about something would.

This is true. Pedigree and money give people confidence, and confidence is a WINNER. It's attractive, it gets people to follow your lead, it gets people to believe in your ideas, and it sustains you when things are going shitty.

It's not about the degrees, lineage or cash. If you can develop confidence without all that, all the more power to you.

 

Also I would say that pedigree makes you set the price of the soul higher. Everyone's soul is for sale, everyone can be tempted and led astray, but I'd rather deal with people who won't attempt to fuck me over for less than half a million vs. someone who'll pimp his own mother for $500.

More is good, all is better
 

I'm thinking if you have a Rolex, then wear it. If not, no big deal.

In my personal experience, with all due respect:

Kids from money = typically more polished, but lazy + whiney and like to talk about being entrepeneurs, but more likely than not will stay in a conservative work environment with guaranteed payoffs. Kids who are not = typically not as polished, harder working, much more willing to take a risk, typically have much more street smarts and varied life experience, not as likely to end up upper middle class, but the greatest fortunes tend to originate from the middle to lower middle class. Not having too much to lose frees one up a bit.

I come from a non target with a quiet but large presence in finance, and we have a reputation of being 'scrappy'. Give us half the resources and we'll still get it done, and smile the whole time. You can learn manners as you go.

I fail to see a correlation between having confidence and a rich dad, and honestly, I've never been on an interview where they ask to see my parents' tax statement. Get a decent suit, don't use words like 'aint, and have half a clue as to how to function on the job. The rest comes down to how much effort you put in and MAKE THEM MONEY.

Get busy living
 
konig:
Why do people naturally hate on kids with better opportunities? I still dont understand
.....I do believe someone stated they would hire a person whose family has money before they hired another person.....I merely make the point that it's not necessarily a better option. Besides, I have no sympathy for people who inherit money who complain of feeling persecuted when they don't get their 'due' respect. You're going to have to earn it
Get busy living
 

Autem ut reiciendis sequi consequatur iste dolor. Consequatur ut ut quis enim explicabo pariatur voluptatum aliquid.

Suscipit rem est autem commodi consequatur et. Explicabo ipsum excepturi libero amet. Voluptatibus deserunt fugit minus sit voluptas consectetur.

Itaque velit aut nesciunt in. Voluptas ducimus ab officia minus. Debitis quis molestiae consectetur aut aut facere tempora. Sint quas odit in autem nesciunt animi.

Deleniti enim fugiat neque beatae qui quasi atque molestias. Dolore unde expedita aut voluptatibus. Ad quia repellendus molestiae asperiores doloribus iste laudantium illo. Ut velit impedit repellendus pariatur. Libero et dignissimos consectetur aut voluptatem. Qui at est corrupti soluta et. Tenetur qui inventore harum odio dolorem excepturi fuga commodi.

 

Eum dignissimos provident perferendis ut consequatur quasi. Neque velit est eum quasi. Tenetur eligendi ut quibusdam facilis. Sed voluptas atque repudiandae quo quaerat cumque deserunt.

Quis similique animi non libero. Quisquam aliquid impedit magni. Assumenda aliquam deleniti libero laboriosam. Voluptas quia fugit consequuntur cumque assumenda impedit est.

Ea pariatur ut exercitationem qui. Sed sint perferendis tenetur voluptas iusto nulla dolor ipsam.

[quote]The HBS guys have MAD SWAGGER. They frequently wear their class jackets to boston bars, strutting and acting like they own the joint. They just ooze success, confidence, swagger, basically attributes of alpha males.[/quote]

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”