Intellectualism of Hedge Funds?
I've been reading around about several hedge fund managers, and besides George Soros, who actually did want to be a philosopher, many hedge fund managers seem to analyze the economy and its trends from a philosophical or at least very abstract viewpoint. (Jim Chanos and Paul Singer were a few others I read about)
I had never really considered hedge funds as a career before except due to the possibility of becoming very wealthy, but this really caught my interest.
Is the hedge fund industry and success in it largely based on intellectual and even philosophical analyses (obviously, with a fair amount of financial mechanics, too) or have I just read about a few who seem to follow this path?
Also, on a somewhat unrelated not, a while back I read a study that found between 30-60% of HFs self-reportedly engaged in illegal behavior like insider trading. Is it possible to ETHICALLY succeed in HF?
the term insider trading is kind of a gray area....most algo/hft shops are front runners
i think Bridgewater Assosciates has been producing alpha for quite sometime, being 100% legit..but i also heard most of their investments are overseas (macro) so take it for what it's worth
People like you piss me off.
Think about it. I've read there are about 2,500 hedge funds that have at least 100m AUM. Of those, 30% would be 750 and 60% 1500. If the Feds could take down SAC (one of the largest hedge funds) what makes you think they can't take down a less sophisicated one?
You may say it's hard to prove in court if they are undertaking insider trading but if so, why would these hedge funds be counted as part of 30%-60% then?
Take everything you read with a grain of salt, especially with a limited amount information being publicly available.
And self-reportedly??? What the hell does that even mean? They are telling on themselves?
Carl Icahn was a Philosophy major at Princeton. Although he does not manage HFs anymore.
ur gonna do a lot of bs work before you get to the level of intellectualism ur thinking about. unless ur at bridgewater, ur dad is a pm, or u take this illegal drug that heightens ur senses and brain power including the ability to recall any info from the shadows in ur memory.
I doubt that study is accurate, and what I mean by doubt is... it's not accurate.
And why are people using Bridgewater as an example of an intellectual hedge fund?
Carl Icahn is a Philosophy major graduate.
I guess your lesser preftigious ''value'' fund must be so much more intellectual.
Well dalio has an entire pdf on his "principles"
Actual philosophy has absolutely nothing to do with finance. Unless of course your investment strategy somehow revolves around the true nature of existence.
philosophy is the most interesting subject to read about
Please explain yourself.
I think it's quite obvious I'm not decrying the hedge fund industry, considering the entire post is an expression of my interest in it. I don't know very much about it, so I just wanted to make sure it was ethical. I understand HFs get needlessly dogged all the time in the media, so I understand why you (and several other commenters) interpreted my post as a threatening accusation and turned foolishly defensive while ignoring the bulk of my post.
To those who correctly read the tone of the post, about how long does it take to get in a position to work intellectually in a hedge fund? What positions are those?
mayb if u dew sum rsrch b4 u pst thingz abt hdg fndz w/0 knowing wtf u r tlking aboot u wudnt get sch a hostile reakshun
I have my gripes with Bridgewater, but I think it's hard to deny that it's an intellectual place.
I will say though, it's definitely been fun to watch their funds bite the dust this year as gold has tanked. Not that it matters, all my friends who work there will still make multiples of what I do, but it's still nice to be able to indulge my schadenfreude every now and then.
My feeling on Bridgewater from this standpoint of being "intellectual" is probably that I'm using a different definition. They're more of a formulaic firm than one with a bunch of deep thinkers sitting around taking really abstract views on securities and investing on the wholly qualitative and non-methodical factors. You could say intellectual means having the brainpower to manage as much money as they do and still have very intelligent strategies, but I think more of the Chanos or something when I think of a fund that has a deeply intellectual approach to investing.
Hahaha, long term memory FTW.
I don't think any self-reporting statistics about crime can be relied upon.
On a side note... I wouldn't really call the SEC's handling of the SAC investigation a win for the government. A multi-billion dollar fortune and no prison time for Cohen makes him bi-winning.
You seem impotent brother, and your logic is flawed. It's hilarious you already reached such a conclusion on my racial preference based on a mocking comment.
Hugh Hendry has a lot of stuff on youtube that is pretty intellectual IMO. Not that I agree with all he says, but he fits the bill of a more philosophical (and maybe self important) PM.
Intellectualism can be found in any place, doesn't matter what kind of place. It's all about the process IMO. Willing to be contrarian, willing to admit you're wrong, analyzing multiple viewpoints, etc.
This is abject nonsense.
Go away.
Id agree with the notion that hfs in general are one of the most intellectual areas within finance
I can reassure you that there is no intellectualism anywhere in banking (and a decent amt of PE for that matter).
Thank you everyone for the helpful responses regarding intellectualism. I can see that they are definitely somewhat, though not completely intellectual, which is sensable, so I'll continue to research hedge funds in the future.
deleted
Read about George Soros's theory of reflexivity.
you should focus your time and energy on learning how the markets operate, and how to trade intraday. This will be the most valuable use of your time.
This. +1 glad it was mentioned
Soros borrowed heavily from Karl Popper - his stuff will blow your mind or leave your head spinning, depending on what metal buzz your seeking...
Falsifiability - the belief that for any hypothesis to have credence, it must be inherently disprovable before it can become accepted as a scientific hypothesis or theory.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb's fooled by randomness and black swan are good, but the guy is a complete twat
Don't worry, I just graduated high school and am trying to figure out where to focus.
I'll definitely look at the theory of reflexivity and probably a lot of other stuff Soros has wrote (Possibly Alchemy of Finance, among others). I've read/been told even by people that don't like him that he's an investing genius and his writing is pure gold. Is that accurate?
Also, is Dalio's "Principles" worth reading?
I think that the people who are the best buyside traders/PMs do often come at the World in a different way then your average finance person and do often have a mentality that is more philosophical in nature...I was an economics major but i think of my job as a creative pursuit and i consider people who think differently to be major assets. Most PMs I know who are very good are quirky people also...in fact i'd almost say all of them are. Basically the right mentality is that if everyone thinks something then it must be wrong and if everyone says im crazy when i say something then i just might be onto something...its easy to say that but it takes the right type of person to actually engage markets that way and generally they have to be a bit crazy.
The problem is that the menial, junior level work that it requires to cut ones teeth in the industry is generally better handled by linear thinkers who majored in stuff like finance, engineering, accounting etc. So basically to be great you have to be an artist, but to get access to the job you need a boring background...so its a bit tricky.
There's little doubt, to me at least, that those with backgrounds in economics have a fundamentally different approach towards investing and a fundamentally different understanding of markets (though their views are definitely heterogeneous).
Yes, the super investors of our time have a certain philosophy when approaching investing.
It isn't just about completing a comprehensive valuation with a lot of numbers, but understanding the interconnected nature of them and how our economy functions beyond what you are taught in school.
Either way, you are not going to stand out by touting what you learned from school by some failed businessman (face it, if he was successful he would be out there making it rain with the rest of them).
Learning how to invest is simple, but becoming a >true
The HF I interned at had one of the top managers in Canada, and his undergrad was in philosophy. IMO to be successful at investing you have to think outside the box, not necessarily just base your picks on finances alone.
Every superstar HF manager has their own style and special set of skills / talents that helps them to succeed. Some are traders with social instincts that can catch feelings from the atmosphere on a trading floor, others are mathematical geniuses and others have more of the philosopher style you mentioned... The first book you should read if you're interested in this type of thing is Hedge Hogging. The second is When Genius Failed.
please cite or give evidence and expound upon 'most algo/hft' shops are front runners?
are you retarded?
how long you been waiting to use that one webster? next time try using that thesaurus to elaborate or reason so op may benefit from reading your post instead of using a simple childish retort...or at least be amusing
guess u never watched limitless
Have you ever read about how HFT works?? They often send out 'fake' orders to the market to see what others are doing. IT's front running, albeit electronically.
I now trust your opinion more than 99% of WSO's because I fucking hate Taleb so much... so much that I'm going to go out and buy everything related to Karl Popper and trust you with my wife and children if/when possible.
but, but... he can dead lift 330 pounds!
Also, I love how his books are an extended hit piece on BSM and three months before LTCM blew up he wrote an article in a trade magazine praising how great it is...
http://www.nickdunbar.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Taleb-praises-Mert…
That's hilarious. He always seemed a bit of a douche to me
Taleb borrows from Popper quite a bit. Taleb's works are thought-provoking, but he is such a smarmy douche he's almost unreadable.
Also, Baupost is quite intellectual, from what I've heard. The best analysts/PMs are intellectually curious and want to understand how things work. The fund I interned at prior to getting my full-time role had a very intellectually stimulating environment.
Oh, how I've missed you.
So refreshing to know that I'm not the only one that thinks Taleb is an arrogant and intellectually dishonest.
Taleb, while interesting, is inherently self-contradictory when he talks about unknown uknowns, as this is not really something you can talk about intelligently except to say what we know is not all that is and lots of people have been saying that in one form or another for hundreds, if not thousands of years. He benefitted from being on the lucky side of a trade that, while potentially predictable if people cared to look, did not suggest some deeper insight into the universe.
Taleb, while interesting, is inherently self-contradictory when he talks about unknown uknowns, as this is not really something you can talk about intelligently except to say what we know is not all that is and lots of people have been saying that in one form or another for hundreds, if not thousands of years. He benefitted from being on the lucky side of a trade that, while potentially predictable if people cared to look, did not suggest some deeper insight into the universe.
I've been busy doing unpreftigous and un-intellectual things like reading 10k/10q's, calling management teams, reading about industries, identifying high quality, recurring FCF, etc
Qui minus nostrum nihil quo recusandae quas distinctio. Ipsa distinctio nihil ut occaecati.
Id quo deserunt numquam accusantium consequatur atque blanditiis possimus. Quibusdam cum possimus quam. Aliquid rerum et ut blanditiis. Dolorum est et iusto eligendi.
Aut id expedita quasi facere dolores blanditiis sit. Perspiciatis enim quibusdam quis perferendis ut quasi ut est. Placeat ducimus praesentium est natus quia iusto consequatur. Repudiandae necessitatibus laudantium a dignissimos autem. Quo saepe officia necessitatibus quis velit ullam quia est.
Et et eveniet voluptas corporis reiciendis et corrupti. Quidem deserunt aut non eos eos nostrum assumenda qui. In qui vero corrupti odit accusamus. Tempora nobis error eos autem aut quas incidunt sit. Aut iure aut rerum vitae sapiente.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Perferendis ut illum autem voluptas consequatur est perferendis. Eligendi non tenetur veniam laboriosam beatae dolor molestiae. Sunt quia qui alias quos.
Commodi similique quod dolorem ullam voluptatem. Ducimus aut quisquam asperiores totam alias et. Accusantium dignissimos minus qui debitis qui possimus saepe labore. Inventore veritatis vel omnis praesentium. Enim error voluptatem ratione delectus amet. Corrupti et tempora sint officia hic cupiditate.
Quae quis dolores mollitia quis dolore a quod. Itaque dignissimos reiciendis autem amet sequi excepturi. Occaecati dolorem adipisci a eum corrupti quisquam. Quaerat eveniet dolorem distinctio vel illo.
Numquam sunt quia dolor est ut eaque. Ducimus sit voluptate ad cumque iusto aut commodi. Ea eum sed alias ut recusandae. Rerum voluptatibus magnam voluptate nobis necessitatibus consequatur est numquam. Amet maiores voluptate quia quis pariatur.
Voluptate eius sed corporis molestiae. Maxime ea impedit cupiditate id dolorem. Dolores quia quo error hic in. Ea incidunt cumque suscipit aperiam enim quaerat. Sapiente laudantium neque corrupti tempora qui ratione non. Dolorem et quisquam nesciunt est.
Est ipsum dignissimos commodi illo est sunt. Velit neque in temporibus maiores tenetur culpa rerum. A odit numquam corporis dolores labore. Vero consequuntur est eum et eligendi consequatur. Tempora porro voluptas laboriosam.