Infrastructure Investment Banking
Looking for information about infrastructure investment banking (comp, exit ops, daily activities, etc.). Does anyone know which banks are known for having the best infrastructure groups? What is the possibility of being able to land an PE opportunity at an infrastructure fund (toll roads, utilities, etc.) after a two-year analyst stint?
Given current market conditions, could infrastructure acquisitions and investments be considered more desirable, or less risky.
I think Macquarie is the leader in infrastructure. I don't know much about other bank's infrastructure groups, so I might be wrong though.
i think GS has a pretty sweet infrastructure group....
All three have devoted groups to infrastructure that are quite strong.
Macquarie pretty much only does Infra, so they have to be good at it. Also, it basically is an infra PE job.
Maybe in America, but elsewhere they're much more active in other areas.
UBS did the Jersey turnpike and has a group devoted to it. I think MS is trying to form one.
UBS' group isn't in the IB though, is it? I think the turnpike group was in their AM. Also, JPM has a growing group in AM.
Does anyone have any more information on Goldman's infrastructure IBD group? I believe it is grouped with the public sector indsutry group and called public sector and infrastructure investment banking?
There are two distinct groups at GS with regards to infrastructure. The group you mention used to be the municipal finance group but after Mark Florian, who headed that group out of Chicago, successfully advised the City of Chicago and the State of Indiana on toll road sales they moved him to New York, made him a partner and changed the name of the group. They primarily focus on advising governments on sales of infrastructure assets such as toll roads mentioned above and the state lottery systems in Illinois and Indiana.
However, GS knows better than anyone that the real money is on the buyside. So they raised a ~$6 billion infrastructure fund called Goldman Sachs Infrastructure Partners (GSIP). GSIP is separate to Florian's group and sits within Merchant Banking rather than IBD. When GSIP does deals, Florian's group acts as advisor. GSIP has been extremely active and have invested in ABP (UK ports operator), Carrix (US ports operator), Mexican toll roads, Kinder Morgan, TXU to name some. They should soon be raising a second fund.
in europe, Citi were the first one to establish a separate infra. group & are though to be the best..UBS is second.
Kinda figured that was the point of the post in the first place.
JP Morgan has a fairly nascent group that deals with this stuff. They recruited a bunch of all stars to run the desk so I assume it's pretty solid now. It's technically housed under their Tax Exempt Capital Markets Group within their IBanking Division and it's known as the IAG or infrastructure and advisory group. I can't speak as to exit ops etc - I do know that comp is in line with the rest of the banking division (at least for 1st year analysts, and I assume 2nd years as well). Hours are also a bit better - the job is pitched as being " a six day a week job as opposed to a seven day a week job"
BUMP
Macquarie as said before, and CS has a Transportation Group also. I'm not sure how good it is, but their Infra PE group (GIP) is a pretty big player.
French and Spanish banks are the biggest players in infrastructure not only in Europe but also in the US, most notably BNP, SocGen, Credit Agricole, Santander and BBVA. . It's mainly due to the fact that the largest construction/civil engineering companies are European (e.g. Vinci, Bouygues, ACS).
How much experience is needed in PF to land a job in infra funds? does a MBA help?
Also interested. What’s the recruiting process like for these funds? Do they use headhunters to reach out to Public Finance analysts?
Hello,
Thanks for sharing your great information. In my point of view Ws-Ibank is the best infrastructure banking than the other investment banking.
Thanks a lot ws-ibank.com
Bump this baby back.
Is there anywhere where I can find out about the modelling involved, or anything unique about being in this industry coverage group? Got an interview coming up
Modelling is crazy! Your typical LBO runs roughly 7-10 sheets, infra models are 30-40 (not superfluous use of sheets, legitimate 300+ rows on each), they suck. Since the coverage ratios tend to be tight (e.g. ADSCR of 1.3 and a default levels of around 1.03) every accountable detail is incorporated, also by the nature of a project or infra asset all expect expenditures are predictable (the unpredictable costs are sucked up into reserve accounts) and so are accounted for.
add in your multiple debt tranches, dsra calcs, other reserve accounts, refis, granular d&a and tax, and just general granular expense and revenue cals then you're looking at models that will go over 10/15mbs easily
macros are also fairly common to solve for a target irr and debt
Hi everybody, I am interested too. I am currently interning at a major Chinese contractor's fund, though mainly doing market research, and would like to move to a big bank in the future. Is there any recommended source to strengthen the financial and modelling part?
Best Infrastructure IBDs in London? (Originally Posted: 07/20/2012)
Which teams in London have the best dealflow and reputation? Can anyone share the infrastructure league tables for LTM or CY 2011?
Thanks.
HSBC, RBC, UniCredit, Big 4, SMBC, CS. please note that this a mixture of PFI banks and M&A advisory who service your Balfour Beattys, Veolias etc..
a few of the BBs have infra funds such as MS, JP in addition to your GIPs etc..
Thanks! Great info.
Does GS, BAML, or Citi have much presence here? And reputation-wise, I would assume the BBs are at the top?
Rothschild, Lazard and so on are at the top. Those fellows are at the top for trading.
I would say that Roths are predicated upon the Roths brand (i.e. the companies they own).
without knowing what we're looking at (M&A or PFI) it's hard to say. If it's M&A, it's going to be the big lads, the BBs. if we're talking big PFI it's a whole different story.
i am curious to know which banks in London are strong on the M&A/advisory front, specifically in terms of power/utilities/renewables and social infrastructure, don't know too much about the M&A side of things
i know in terms of project finance lending and advisory, french banks are pretty top notch (both infra and energy), especially SocGen, i've also seen HSBC consistently at the top, RBS was but not anymore.. in terms of lending, it seems to be the european and japanese commerical banks, like hsbc, the french, japanese banks in terms of advisory, i know it was more of a big 4 thing, but now more BBs and other banks are active because of the overall cross-sell economics, like hedging, bonds, etc.
from personal experience SG advisory isn't that great. similarly with E&Y and PwC advisory, not great. KPMG, not tooo bad.
J.P Morgan's UK Industrials team is pretty badass for M&A / advisory and has some mega clients including a lot of the homebuilders.
Will infra funds actually look at commercial bank project finance lending experience, or strictly have greater preference for bulge M&A candidates ? i look at postings and they always seems to say, will also look at project finance backgrounds, as if its a secondary choice, i'm guessing it depends on the fund.. GIP vs something like infrared
also is it common to go to a development bank like EBRD, IFC, ADB after a few years ? i can see decent hours, solid base and benefits with little or no bonus, possibly interesting emerging markets work, but the politics/bureaucracy is a nightmare ? any other pros/cons ?
A young analyst with PPP / PFI experience is hard to come by, and hence in relatively high demand. GIP, being the CS / GE JV, will look at both (M&A, advisory and PFI lending), Infrared (who are looking for an analyst atm) want PPP / PFI experience. Accountancy advisory on PFI is also a valued commodity (god knows why in the UK so much weight is placed on the big 4 / ACA, my experience with them in all respects - PFI, restructuring, capital markets - is woeful).
EIB, EBRD etc. is where people go where their career has failed. if you like bureaucracy and only being able to do vanilla deals, sure. otherwise, i'd stay clear until you want to semi retire.
All PE firms favour BB candidates, even Infra PE funds.
In a tight credit environment, I would argue the best project finance experience will be with whoever has balance sheet power as those institutions will drive the transaction process. As soon as a bank isn't able to back pf deals anymore, all your idle project finance bankers will be eager to jump on painful financial advisory mandates for the sake of keeping themselves busy - not to make money.
very true. certain banks are cut out of tenor. if you can't do >10yr tenor, there's no point in turn up. there are a lot of pf bankers roaming the streets. guys in our office will get calls every other day where you'll just here our guy say "no, sorry mate, we're not hiring" (we can do tenor; obviously, we're a fund).
Infrastructure ibd (Originally Posted: 04/14/2010)
Is there anything infrastructure specific I can read up on? - how to value an airport, etc.
What can I expect in an interview ? (SA)
Thanks in advance
Long-lived assets, small but stable cash flows, boring Australian sponsors. That's it.
is it just me, or is infrastructure the least sexy of asset classes?
You may or may not have seen the following (which is, by the way, neither here nor there)
Re Airports specifically:
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/how-do-you-value-an-airport-walk-…
You may also like to read up on project finance more generally. I'd start here...
http://www.people.hbs.edu/besty/projfinportal/
Further (and depending on how much you want to invest in your interview) the website linked below is for a publisher that offers a number of infrastructure and project finance specific books (all of which can be purchased as ebook files - important if your interview is tomorrow...)
http://www.euromoneyplc.com/page.asp?PageID=335
Oh... and sign up for a trial subscription to the following:
http://www.infra-americas.com/
Hope this helps...
Thanks a lot. Sent a banana your way.
No problems oomp _loompa
Power / Infrastructure Boutique Investment Banking Firms? (Originally Posted: 07/14/2010)
Are there any pure-play boutique power / infrastructure investment banking firms (other than the firms listed below)? It seems like all the power / infrastructure banking groups are housed within the bulge brackets, such as UBS, JPM, GS, Credit Suisse, Macquarie, etc.
Here are the two that I know of...
Marathon Capital McManus & Miles
Any others? Please help me if you know of one...
I work at a small infra/energy shop in South Florida.
Macquire is also heavy into it as well
I don't know anything else about this firm, but it looks like it fits your criteria: http://www.fpcg.com/
Public Sector/Infrastructure IBD (Originally Posted: 12/23/2007)
Does anyone have any input on Public Sector/Infrastructure Groups that are part of IBD? What BBs have better reputations w/ these types of groups? Also, can you speak to items such as the type of work done (municipal origination vs. Public Private Partnership Deals), analyst lifestyle, exit opportunities, etc.
Depends on firm. Which firm do you want to know about?
Any info about Goldman PS&I? It was recently reclassified as one of their industry groups.
Does anyone have any information?
How do institutions source infrastructure deals? (Originally Posted: 10/04/2012)
Exactly as the title reads. Sorry, probably did not need its own thread, but thought someone on here might know.
what instiutions? banks? sponsors? municipalities? contractors?
Whoever the buyers are, pension funds mainly I guess.
buyers? okay, so i guess you mean the equity which could be a pension fund, a PE fund, a contractor, a bank. But there is also debt, which could be all of the above bar the contractor.
okay so how to equity source a deal. the contracting authority will advertise a tender for the project, consortiums (which will be made up of a combination of the above parties) will bid to win the project in line with the tender guidelines and the lowest NPV will normally win.
you have to remember that they wont own the infra, they didn't buy it. they own the contract to build and operate it but they wont own the hard assets. these will be the property of the contracting authority. (this is based on the PPP model). airports (and ports in the UK) are generally different, they can own the assets in some cases
Are there any orgs that specialize in being intermediaries for the PPP deals? Or is usually done direct from government to contractor to the equity source?
Infra isn't too big in the US, we are behind the curve, but it is certainly catching on. A hot spot right now would be Brazil for infra between the World Cup and the Olympics coming in the next several years. Some of the biggest investors in infrastructure right now are actually the big Japanese banks. There aren't too many PPP (PFI in the UK) funds being raised right now globally, but Macquarie is a pretty well known fund manager when it comes to this side of infra, as is OFA Infavira and Edifice Capital. Then of course there are the firms everyone knows, like Barclays, BlackRock, and UBS who will have infrastructure investment arms as well.
big infra funds: GIP, infrared, mac, Morgan Stanley...
Infrastructure Banking (Originally Posted: 04/28/2011)
Wondering who the top investment banks are in Infrastructure banking. These people often sit in Private Equity.l
what makes you say these people sit in PE?
Muni/Infrastructure Banking? (Originally Posted: 04/17/2007)
Does anyone have opinions about infrastructure investment banking at bulge braket firms? Hoping to eventually get to working for an infrastructure fund, and was wondering about public finance and specifically these industry groups (in terms of experience, learning opportunities, exit opps both for a 3rd/4th yr and/or after MBA program and compensation) relative to more conventional corp fin.
I was also wondering about the same thing. Anyone have experience in this field?
Depends on the bank and how active they are in the infrastructure side of things rather than muni. Goldman and Morgan Stanley, I would argue, have had the most success turning their public finance groups into infrastructure groups both on the sell-side and now on the buyside. Goldman recently raised $6bn for their infrastructure fund which is advised primarily by their infra/muni group. Morgan, CS, JP Morgan have raised funds as well with ML and UBS becoming more active on the sell-side.
In terms of exit opps, all the funds above are options as well as pe funds that have jumped into this space like Carlyle.
1
"We paused and chuckled together at the notion of Municipal Finance, wading in the pathetic image of some dude convinced he was saving the world, one shitty Iowa hospital bond deal at a time."
bump
bump please
It sucks. What more do you need to know? There's a reason no one is replying.
Macquarie has a great infrastructure group
Nihil rem quia recusandae voluptatum atque inventore sed. Eaque corrupti aperiam quis magni vel excepturi porro et. Asperiores consequatur illum saepe nostrum sint nihil adipisci.
Incidunt ad voluptatem quos ut quam et. Et eum repellendus sunt autem doloribus maiores. Dolore ipsum aut eum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quidem omnis id odio qui adipisci et. Temporibus et labore nobis est provident quisquam doloremque. Sequi et perspiciatis dolore adipisci aut dolorem molestias. Qui dolores minus quas vero ipsa.
Magni iste reprehenderit qui repudiandae doloribus. Magnam corporis sed non maiores sunt enim ducimus. Quam ut qui cum quibusdam. Reiciendis autem sunt atque quia illo. Beatae veritatis aut saepe neque quibusdam.
Necessitatibus facilis repudiandae pariatur. Et dolores aut dolorem. Quas nostrum officiis facere non est veniam aut. Repellendus ut et suscipit aliquid consequuntur vero.
Ex aut recusandae ut vel ut deserunt nemo nostrum. Rerum repudiandae et nam asperiores. Optio iure perferendis modi blanditiis voluptatem veritatis laudantium.
Eveniet ut optio error qui consequuntur ad. Dolores harum dolor rerum deleniti aut. Quam eveniet voluptatum cupiditate error voluptatem voluptatum quas.
Voluptatibus temporibus odit veritatis sunt non consequuntur. Est sit voluptas non et. A sint dolorum et minus corrupti quia rem dolorem. Earum aliquid at doloribus perferendis quaerat. Voluptates vero unde est voluptatem. Aperiam distinctio minima amet omnis debitis. Dignissimos et ut illum sed.
Dolore qui quod quae delectus laudantium sed sint quis. Repudiandae numquam sed commodi aut quae suscipit accusamus. Quo natus fugit aperiam eius sit. Beatae voluptatibus unde explicabo nesciunt.